William S Evans, Mary Ziemba-Davis, Leonard T Buller, R Michael Meneghini
{"title":"导尿管干预治疗原发性髋关节和膝关节全关节置换术后尿潴留的有效性和安全性。","authors":"William S Evans, Mary Ziemba-Davis, Leonard T Buller, R Michael Meneghini","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common barrier to rapid-discharge hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of catheterization intervention methods for POUR before and after discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,659 primary TJAs were retrospectively reviewed. POUR resolutions before and after discharge were evaluated relative to catheterization type and other covariates. Complications before and within 90 days of discharge were quantified. A total of 113 POUR cases comprised the analysis sample of 76 hips and 37 knees in 51 women and 62 men with an average age and body mass index of 68.6 (range 22 to 92) years and 31.7 (range 16 to 49) kg/m 2 .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POUR resolved before discharge for 82.3% (93/113) of patients, with equivalent resolution rates for intermittent catheterization alone (84.2%, 32/38) compared with indwelling catheterization with or without intermittent catheterization (82.6%, 57/69, P < 0.999), equivalent time to resolution ( P = 0.319), and no difference in complication rates ( P = 0.999). Complication rates within 90 days of discharge were higher for patients treated with indwelling catheters before discharge ( P = 0.049). Resolution before discharge was more likely with increasing body mass index ( P = 0.026) and less likely for patients with a history of urinary retention ( P = 0.033). 60 percent (12/20) of patients with unresolved POUR were discharged with self-intermittent catheterization and 40% (8/20) with indwelling catheters, with no differences in efficacy and safety based on the catheterization type ( P = 0.109).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Before discharge, we observed equivalent resolution rates and equivalent time to resolution for indwelling and intermittent catheterization alone without compromising patient safety. Intermittent catheterization is favored, however, because in situ catheter exposure is dramatically reduced and postdischarge complication rates are lower. Additional research is needed to develop evidence-based POUR guidelines for outpatient TJA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1299-e1307"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Interventions for Postoperative Urinary Retention After Primary Hip and Knee Total Joint Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"William S Evans, Mary Ziemba-Davis, Leonard T Buller, R Michael Meneghini\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common barrier to rapid-discharge hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of catheterization intervention methods for POUR before and after discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,659 primary TJAs were retrospectively reviewed. POUR resolutions before and after discharge were evaluated relative to catheterization type and other covariates. Complications before and within 90 days of discharge were quantified. A total of 113 POUR cases comprised the analysis sample of 76 hips and 37 knees in 51 women and 62 men with an average age and body mass index of 68.6 (range 22 to 92) years and 31.7 (range 16 to 49) kg/m 2 .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POUR resolved before discharge for 82.3% (93/113) of patients, with equivalent resolution rates for intermittent catheterization alone (84.2%, 32/38) compared with indwelling catheterization with or without intermittent catheterization (82.6%, 57/69, P < 0.999), equivalent time to resolution ( P = 0.319), and no difference in complication rates ( P = 0.999). Complication rates within 90 days of discharge were higher for patients treated with indwelling catheters before discharge ( P = 0.049). Resolution before discharge was more likely with increasing body mass index ( P = 0.026) and less likely for patients with a history of urinary retention ( P = 0.033). 60 percent (12/20) of patients with unresolved POUR were discharged with self-intermittent catheterization and 40% (8/20) with indwelling catheters, with no differences in efficacy and safety based on the catheterization type ( P = 0.109).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Before discharge, we observed equivalent resolution rates and equivalent time to resolution for indwelling and intermittent catheterization alone without compromising patient safety. Intermittent catheterization is favored, however, because in situ catheter exposure is dramatically reduced and postdischarge complication rates are lower. Additional research is needed to develop evidence-based POUR guidelines for outpatient TJA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1299-e1307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01211\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:术后尿潴留(POUR)是髋关节和膝关节全关节置换术(TJA)快速出院的常见障碍。我们评估了出院前后导尿干预方法治疗 POUR 的有效性和安全性:我们对 1659 例初次 TJA 进行了回顾性研究。根据导管类型和其他协变量对出院前后的 POUR 解决情况进行了评估。对出院前和出院后90天内的并发症进行了量化。分析样本中共有113例POUR病例,其中76例髋关节和37例膝关节,51例为女性,62例为男性,平均年龄和体重指数分别为68.6(22至92岁)和31.7(16至49岁)kg/m2:82.3%的患者(93/113)在出院前缓解了POUR症状,与留置导管加或不加间歇导管治疗(82.6%,57/69,P < 0.999)相比,单纯间歇导管治疗的缓解率相当(84.2%,32/38),缓解时间相当(P = 0.319),并发症发生率无差异(P = 0.999)。出院前使用留置导管治疗的患者在出院后 90 天内的并发症发生率更高(P = 0.049)。体重指数越高,出院前解决的可能性越大(P = 0.026),而有尿潴留病史的患者出院前解决的可能性较小(P = 0.033)。60%(12/20)未解决 POUR 的患者出院时自行间歇导尿,40%(8/20)留置导尿,导尿类型不同,疗效和安全性也无差异(P = 0.109):讨论:在出院前,我们观察到留置导管和间歇导管的缓解率和缓解时间相当,且不会影响患者的安全。不过,间歇导管术更受欢迎,因为原位导管暴露显著减少,出院后并发症发生率也更低。要为门诊 TJA 制定以证据为基础的 POUR 指南,还需要进行更多的研究。
Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Interventions for Postoperative Urinary Retention After Primary Hip and Knee Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Introduction: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common barrier to rapid-discharge hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of catheterization intervention methods for POUR before and after discharge.
Methods: A total of 1,659 primary TJAs were retrospectively reviewed. POUR resolutions before and after discharge were evaluated relative to catheterization type and other covariates. Complications before and within 90 days of discharge were quantified. A total of 113 POUR cases comprised the analysis sample of 76 hips and 37 knees in 51 women and 62 men with an average age and body mass index of 68.6 (range 22 to 92) years and 31.7 (range 16 to 49) kg/m 2 .
Results: POUR resolved before discharge for 82.3% (93/113) of patients, with equivalent resolution rates for intermittent catheterization alone (84.2%, 32/38) compared with indwelling catheterization with or without intermittent catheterization (82.6%, 57/69, P < 0.999), equivalent time to resolution ( P = 0.319), and no difference in complication rates ( P = 0.999). Complication rates within 90 days of discharge were higher for patients treated with indwelling catheters before discharge ( P = 0.049). Resolution before discharge was more likely with increasing body mass index ( P = 0.026) and less likely for patients with a history of urinary retention ( P = 0.033). 60 percent (12/20) of patients with unresolved POUR were discharged with self-intermittent catheterization and 40% (8/20) with indwelling catheters, with no differences in efficacy and safety based on the catheterization type ( P = 0.109).
Discussion: Before discharge, we observed equivalent resolution rates and equivalent time to resolution for indwelling and intermittent catheterization alone without compromising patient safety. Intermittent catheterization is favored, however, because in situ catheter exposure is dramatically reduced and postdischarge complication rates are lower. Additional research is needed to develop evidence-based POUR guidelines for outpatient TJA.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues.
Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.