阿巴拉契亚中南部地区不愿意接种 COVID-19 疫苗的相关因素。

Journal of Appalachian health Pub Date : 2023-12-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.13023/jah.0503.06
Florence M Weierbach, Rebecca Adkins Fletcher, Ingrid E Luffman, Cynthia Meyer, Janet M Keener, Manik Ahuja, Hadii M Mamudu
{"title":"阿巴拉契亚中南部地区不愿意接种 COVID-19 疫苗的相关因素。","authors":"Florence M Weierbach, Rebecca Adkins Fletcher, Ingrid E Luffman, Cynthia Meyer, Janet M Keener, Manik Ahuja, Hadii M Mamudu","doi":"10.13023/jah.0503.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The newly emergent COVID-19 virus reached pandemic levels in March 2020. By the middle of August 2020, there were over 1 million deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the U.S., with those in rural areas outpacing urban counterparts. Prior to emergency approval of the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccine formulations, mitigation efforts addressing individual behavior were challenging. However, even with the entrance of these three new vaccines, herd immunity was not achieved in rural areas, as vaccine uptake remained low there. Although there has since been an abundance of COVID-19-related research addressing health literacy, vaccine hesitancy and overall medical mistrust, few of these studies focus on Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study identifies barriers and facilitators to adherence with COVID-19 mitigation, focusing specifically on vaccine hesitancy in South Central Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data study was conducted with a subset of Appalachian residents from the COVID-19 Public Health survey. Participants were grouped by county using ARC economic county designations for analysis. The dependent variable, vaccine hesitancy, was explored in relation to five categories of independent variable: (1) demographics (with four conceptual areas); (2) belief; (3) action; (4) medical mistrust; and (5) health literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate vaccine hesitancy attributes include beliefs addressing COVID-19 threat, overstatement of severity of illness, risk of vaccines, vaccine safety information not present from manufacturer, and independent decision to vaccinate. Findings from this study are comparable to HPV vaccine studies in Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>As interventions are developed for Appalachia, it is paramount to focus vaccine administration at the individual and population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"5 3","pages":"71-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Central Appalachia.\",\"authors\":\"Florence M Weierbach, Rebecca Adkins Fletcher, Ingrid E Luffman, Cynthia Meyer, Janet M Keener, Manik Ahuja, Hadii M Mamudu\",\"doi\":\"10.13023/jah.0503.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The newly emergent COVID-19 virus reached pandemic levels in March 2020. By the middle of August 2020, there were over 1 million deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the U.S., with those in rural areas outpacing urban counterparts. Prior to emergency approval of the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccine formulations, mitigation efforts addressing individual behavior were challenging. However, even with the entrance of these three new vaccines, herd immunity was not achieved in rural areas, as vaccine uptake remained low there. Although there has since been an abundance of COVID-19-related research addressing health literacy, vaccine hesitancy and overall medical mistrust, few of these studies focus on Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study identifies barriers and facilitators to adherence with COVID-19 mitigation, focusing specifically on vaccine hesitancy in South Central Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data study was conducted with a subset of Appalachian residents from the COVID-19 Public Health survey. Participants were grouped by county using ARC economic county designations for analysis. The dependent variable, vaccine hesitancy, was explored in relation to five categories of independent variable: (1) demographics (with four conceptual areas); (2) belief; (3) action; (4) medical mistrust; and (5) health literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate vaccine hesitancy attributes include beliefs addressing COVID-19 threat, overstatement of severity of illness, risk of vaccines, vaccine safety information not present from manufacturer, and independent decision to vaccinate. Findings from this study are comparable to HPV vaccine studies in Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>As interventions are developed for Appalachia, it is paramount to focus vaccine administration at the individual and population level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Appalachian health\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"71-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Appalachian health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0503.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0503.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:新出现的 COVID-19 病毒于 2020 年 3 月达到大流行水平。截至 2020 年 8 月中旬,美国因 COVID-19 导致的死亡人数超过 100 万,其中农村地区的死亡人数超过了城市地区。在辉瑞、Moderna 和强生公司的疫苗配方获得紧急批准之前,针对个人行为的缓解工作具有挑战性。然而,即使有了这三种新疫苗,农村地区也无法实现群体免疫,因为疫苗的接种率仍然很低。目的:本研究确定了坚持接种 COVID-19 缓解措施的障碍和促进因素,特别关注中南部阿巴拉契亚地区的疫苗犹豫不决问题:对 COVID-19 公共卫生调查中的一部分阿巴拉契亚居民进行了二次数据研究。参与者按县分组,使用 ARC 经济县名称进行分析。因变量疫苗犹豫与五类自变量相关:(1) 人口统计学(包括四个概念领域);(2) 信仰;(3) 行动;(4) 医疗不信任;以及 (5) 健康知识:结果:研究结果表明,疫苗犹豫的属性包括应对 COVID-19 威胁的信念、夸大疾病的严重程度、疫苗的风险、制造商未提供的疫苗安全信息以及是否接种疫苗的独立决定。这项研究的结果与阿巴拉契亚地区的 HPV 疫苗研究结果相当:启示:在为阿巴拉契亚制定干预措施时,最重要的是将疫苗接种的重点放在个人和人群层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Central Appalachia.

Introduction: The newly emergent COVID-19 virus reached pandemic levels in March 2020. By the middle of August 2020, there were over 1 million deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the U.S., with those in rural areas outpacing urban counterparts. Prior to emergency approval of the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccine formulations, mitigation efforts addressing individual behavior were challenging. However, even with the entrance of these three new vaccines, herd immunity was not achieved in rural areas, as vaccine uptake remained low there. Although there has since been an abundance of COVID-19-related research addressing health literacy, vaccine hesitancy and overall medical mistrust, few of these studies focus on Appalachia.

Purpose: This study identifies barriers and facilitators to adherence with COVID-19 mitigation, focusing specifically on vaccine hesitancy in South Central Appalachia.

Methods: A secondary data study was conducted with a subset of Appalachian residents from the COVID-19 Public Health survey. Participants were grouped by county using ARC economic county designations for analysis. The dependent variable, vaccine hesitancy, was explored in relation to five categories of independent variable: (1) demographics (with four conceptual areas); (2) belief; (3) action; (4) medical mistrust; and (5) health literacy.

Results: Findings indicate vaccine hesitancy attributes include beliefs addressing COVID-19 threat, overstatement of severity of illness, risk of vaccines, vaccine safety information not present from manufacturer, and independent decision to vaccinate. Findings from this study are comparable to HPV vaccine studies in Appalachia.

Implications: As interventions are developed for Appalachia, it is paramount to focus vaccine administration at the individual and population level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Chronic Pain Among Adults Diagnosed with Diabetes Residing in Rural Appalachia. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intimate Partner Violence and Child Maltreatment Services in Rural Northwest North Carolina. Nutrition Education Needs and Barriers of Uninsured Clients who Utilize Free Clinics in Western North Carolina. Aftermath: A Word to Appalachia Following Hurricane Helene. Psychosocial Factors, Stress and Sleep Among Rural Appalachian Kentucky Residents with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1