发展嵌入式研究员角色:从英国唐卡斯特国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)健康决定因素研究合作组织(HDRC)第一年的工作中学习

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100516
E. Holding , R. Gettings , A. Foster , L. Dowrick , S. Hampshaw , A. Haywood , C. Homer , A. Booth , E. Goyder
{"title":"发展嵌入式研究员角色:从英国唐卡斯特国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)健康决定因素研究合作组织(HDRC)第一年的工作中学习","authors":"E. Holding ,&nbsp;R. Gettings ,&nbsp;A. Foster ,&nbsp;L. Dowrick ,&nbsp;S. Hampshaw ,&nbsp;A. Haywood ,&nbsp;C. Homer ,&nbsp;A. Booth ,&nbsp;E. Goyder","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Strategies to embed research knowledge into decision making contexts include the Embedded Research (ER) model, which involves the collocation of academic researchers in non-academic organisations such as hospitals and local authorities. A local authority in Doncaster, United Kingdom (UK) has adopted an embedded researcher model within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC). This five-year collaboration enables universities and local authorities to work together to reduce health inequalities and target the social determinants of health. Building on previous embedded research models, this approach is unique due to its significant scale and long-term investment. In this opinion paper Embedded Researchers (ERs) reflect on their experiences of the first year of the collaboration.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A reflective consultation exercise.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observation of HDRC delivery meetings, as well as informal discussions and a short proforma with ERs (N = 8).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ERs valued the five-year timeframe which provided a unique opportunity for strengthened relationships and to apply formative learning as the programme progressed. However, differences in knowledge of undertaking research across the HDRC team and between practitioners and academics require each to respect different professional experiences and to avoid potential power imbalances. Diverse projects required researchers to be generalists, applying their expertise to multiple topics. This requires careful priority setting alongside workload and expectation management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The significant scale and investment of the HDRC provides a unique opportunity for developing the ER role by applying formative learning as the programme progresses. However, success will require careful management of workload allocation and relationships between ERs and practitioners. Further learning on how to embed ERs within local authority contexts will emerge as the programme matures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000533/pdfft?md5=435959e3b0d3119cf236f7cea3015319&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000533-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the embedded researcher role: Learning from the first year of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC), Doncaster, UK\",\"authors\":\"E. Holding ,&nbsp;R. Gettings ,&nbsp;A. Foster ,&nbsp;L. Dowrick ,&nbsp;S. Hampshaw ,&nbsp;A. Haywood ,&nbsp;C. Homer ,&nbsp;A. Booth ,&nbsp;E. Goyder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Strategies to embed research knowledge into decision making contexts include the Embedded Research (ER) model, which involves the collocation of academic researchers in non-academic organisations such as hospitals and local authorities. A local authority in Doncaster, United Kingdom (UK) has adopted an embedded researcher model within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC). This five-year collaboration enables universities and local authorities to work together to reduce health inequalities and target the social determinants of health. Building on previous embedded research models, this approach is unique due to its significant scale and long-term investment. In this opinion paper Embedded Researchers (ERs) reflect on their experiences of the first year of the collaboration.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A reflective consultation exercise.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observation of HDRC delivery meetings, as well as informal discussions and a short proforma with ERs (N = 8).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ERs valued the five-year timeframe which provided a unique opportunity for strengthened relationships and to apply formative learning as the programme progressed. However, differences in knowledge of undertaking research across the HDRC team and between practitioners and academics require each to respect different professional experiences and to avoid potential power imbalances. Diverse projects required researchers to be generalists, applying their expertise to multiple topics. This requires careful priority setting alongside workload and expectation management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The significant scale and investment of the HDRC provides a unique opportunity for developing the ER role by applying formative learning as the programme progresses. However, success will require careful management of workload allocation and relationships between ERs and practitioners. Further learning on how to embed ERs within local authority contexts will emerge as the programme matures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000533/pdfft?md5=435959e3b0d3119cf236f7cea3015319&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000533-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景将研究知识嵌入决策环境的策略包括嵌入式研究(ER)模式,该模式涉及学术研究人员与医院和地方当局等非学术组织的合作。英国唐卡斯特(Doncaster)的一个地方当局在国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)的健康决定因素研究合作项目(HDRC)中采用了嵌入式研究员模式。这项为期五年的合作使大学和地方当局能够携手减少健康不平等现象,并针对健康的社会决定因素开展研究。在以往嵌入式研究模式的基础上,这种方法因其巨大的规模和长期投资而独树一帜。研究设计反思性咨询活动方法观察人类发展研究中心的交付会议,与嵌入式研究人员(N = 8)进行非正式讨论并填写一份简短的问卷调查表。结果嵌入式研究人员非常重视五年的时间框架,这为他们提供了一个独特的机会来加强关系,并随着计划的进展应用形成性学习。然而,人类发展报告研究中心团队以及从业人员和学者之间对开展研究的认识存在差异,这就要求各方尊重不同的专业经验,避免潜在的权力失衡。多样化的项目要求研究人员成为通才,将其专业知识应用于多个主题。结论人类发展报告研究中心的巨大规模和投资为随着计划的进展应用形成性学习来发展研究人员的作用提供了一个独特的机会。然而,要取得成功,就必须认真管理工作量分配以及应急专家与从业人员之间的关系。随着该计划的成熟,将进一步学习如何在地方当局的背景下嵌入专家咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing the embedded researcher role: Learning from the first year of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC), Doncaster, UK

Background

Strategies to embed research knowledge into decision making contexts include the Embedded Research (ER) model, which involves the collocation of academic researchers in non-academic organisations such as hospitals and local authorities. A local authority in Doncaster, United Kingdom (UK) has adopted an embedded researcher model within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC). This five-year collaboration enables universities and local authorities to work together to reduce health inequalities and target the social determinants of health. Building on previous embedded research models, this approach is unique due to its significant scale and long-term investment. In this opinion paper Embedded Researchers (ERs) reflect on their experiences of the first year of the collaboration.

Study design

A reflective consultation exercise.

Methods

Observation of HDRC delivery meetings, as well as informal discussions and a short proforma with ERs (N = 8).

Results

ERs valued the five-year timeframe which provided a unique opportunity for strengthened relationships and to apply formative learning as the programme progressed. However, differences in knowledge of undertaking research across the HDRC team and between practitioners and academics require each to respect different professional experiences and to avoid potential power imbalances. Diverse projects required researchers to be generalists, applying their expertise to multiple topics. This requires careful priority setting alongside workload and expectation management.

Conclusions

The significant scale and investment of the HDRC provides a unique opportunity for developing the ER role by applying formative learning as the programme progresses. However, success will require careful management of workload allocation and relationships between ERs and practitioners. Further learning on how to embed ERs within local authority contexts will emerge as the programme matures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1