急诊科静脉注射吗啡治疗烧伤疼痛的疗效和不良反应:观察研究。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5
Francesco Coletta, Rossella Pirolli, Raffaele Annunziata, Manuela Nugnes, Antonio Tommasello, Romolo Villani, Luca Gregorio Giaccari, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace, Pasquale Sansone
{"title":"急诊科静脉注射吗啡治疗烧伤疼痛的疗效和不良反应:观察研究。","authors":"Francesco Coletta, Rossella Pirolli, Raffaele Annunziata, Manuela Nugnes, Antonio Tommasello, Romolo Villani, Luca Gregorio Giaccari, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace, Pasquale Sansone","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of pain following a burn is extremely complex because of the multifactorial nature of burn pain (nociceptive and neuropathic). In the pre-hospital setting and emergency department (ED), the main goal of acute pain management is to reduce the patient's pain, allowing them to maintain function and to prevent the chronification of pain. Opioids are used as first-line treatment in management of burn pain. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous (IV) morphine for burn pain management in the ED and to evaluate pain management in the pre-hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center observational study, patients presenting with second- and third-degree burns were enrolled in our ED. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Burn Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) were performed at ED admission and after 1 h. Pain medications administered before arrival in the ED were reported by the rescue team. All patients received IV acetaminophen every 8 h and IV morphine according NRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included in this study. At the time of arrival to the ED, > 90% of the patients reported severe pain; 95.8% of them received IV morphine to achieve pain relief. After 1 h, > 65% of patients had NRS < 3. The total amount of IV morphine was 18.12 ± 4.26 mg in the first hour. No adverse events were recorded. The BSPAS on admission to the ED was 34.8 ± 5.6, indicating severe anxiety. After 1 h, BSPAS was 12.8 ± 4.8, indicating mild anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IV morphine used for burn pain management in the emergency setting significantly improves patient outcomes in terms of pain. IV morphine also reduced anxiety scores at 1 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"857-864"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Adverse Effects of IV Morphine for Burn Pain Management in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Coletta, Rossella Pirolli, Raffaele Annunziata, Manuela Nugnes, Antonio Tommasello, Romolo Villani, Luca Gregorio Giaccari, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace, Pasquale Sansone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of pain following a burn is extremely complex because of the multifactorial nature of burn pain (nociceptive and neuropathic). In the pre-hospital setting and emergency department (ED), the main goal of acute pain management is to reduce the patient's pain, allowing them to maintain function and to prevent the chronification of pain. Opioids are used as first-line treatment in management of burn pain. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous (IV) morphine for burn pain management in the ED and to evaluate pain management in the pre-hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center observational study, patients presenting with second- and third-degree burns were enrolled in our ED. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Burn Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) were performed at ED admission and after 1 h. Pain medications administered before arrival in the ED were reported by the rescue team. All patients received IV acetaminophen every 8 h and IV morphine according NRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included in this study. At the time of arrival to the ED, > 90% of the patients reported severe pain; 95.8% of them received IV morphine to achieve pain relief. After 1 h, > 65% of patients had NRS < 3. The total amount of IV morphine was 18.12 ± 4.26 mg in the first hour. No adverse events were recorded. The BSPAS on admission to the ED was 34.8 ± 5.6, indicating severe anxiety. After 1 h, BSPAS was 12.8 ± 4.8, indicating mild anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IV morphine used for burn pain management in the emergency setting significantly improves patient outcomes in terms of pain. IV morphine also reduced anxiety scores at 1 h.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"857-864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:烧伤后的疼痛治疗极为复杂,因为烧伤疼痛具有多因素性质(痛觉和神经病理性)。在院前环境和急诊科(ED)中,急性疼痛治疗的主要目标是减轻患者的疼痛,使他们能够保持功能,并防止疼痛慢性化。阿片类药物是治疗烧伤疼痛的一线药物。我们的研究旨在评估静脉注射吗啡治疗急诊室烧伤疼痛的疗效和不良反应,并评估院前环境中的疼痛管理:在这项单中心观察性研究中,我们在急诊室收治了二度和三度烧伤患者。入院时和入院 1 小时后分别进行了数字评定量表(NRS)和烧伤疼痛焦虑量表(BSPAS)。所有患者每 8 小时接受一次对乙酰氨基酚静脉注射,并根据 NRS 接受吗啡静脉注射:本研究共纳入 30 名患者。到达急诊室时,超过 90% 的患者报告有剧烈疼痛;其中 95.8% 的患者接受了静脉注射吗啡以缓解疼痛。1 小时后,超过 65% 的患者 NRS < 3。在第一小时内,静脉注射吗啡的总量为 18.12 ± 4.26 毫克。无不良反应记录。入院时的BSPAS为(34.8 ± 5.6),表明患者存在严重焦虑。1 小时后,BSPAS 为 12.8 ± 4.8,表明焦虑程度较轻:结论:在急诊环境中使用静脉注射吗啡治疗烧伤疼痛可明显改善患者的疼痛预后。静脉注射吗啡还能降低 1 小时后的焦虑评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Adverse Effects of IV Morphine for Burn Pain Management in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study.

Introduction: The management of pain following a burn is extremely complex because of the multifactorial nature of burn pain (nociceptive and neuropathic). In the pre-hospital setting and emergency department (ED), the main goal of acute pain management is to reduce the patient's pain, allowing them to maintain function and to prevent the chronification of pain. Opioids are used as first-line treatment in management of burn pain. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous (IV) morphine for burn pain management in the ED and to evaluate pain management in the pre-hospital setting.

Methods: In this single-center observational study, patients presenting with second- and third-degree burns were enrolled in our ED. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Burn Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) were performed at ED admission and after 1 h. Pain medications administered before arrival in the ED were reported by the rescue team. All patients received IV acetaminophen every 8 h and IV morphine according NRS.

Results: Thirty patients were included in this study. At the time of arrival to the ED, > 90% of the patients reported severe pain; 95.8% of them received IV morphine to achieve pain relief. After 1 h, > 65% of patients had NRS < 3. The total amount of IV morphine was 18.12 ± 4.26 mg in the first hour. No adverse events were recorded. The BSPAS on admission to the ED was 34.8 ± 5.6, indicating severe anxiety. After 1 h, BSPAS was 12.8 ± 4.8, indicating mild anxiety.

Conclusion: IV morphine used for burn pain management in the emergency setting significantly improves patient outcomes in terms of pain. IV morphine also reduced anxiety scores at 1 h.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Different Preemptive Analgesia Measures in Pain Management after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Lumbar Sympathetic Block to Treat CRPS in an 18-Month-Old Girl: A Breaking Barriers Case Report and Review of Literature. The Impact of Different Regional Anesthesia Techniques on the Incidence of Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis. Methadone Conversion Using a 3-Day Switch Strategy in Patients with Cancer on High-Dose Opioids: A Retrospective Study. Present and Future of Pharmacological Management for Acute Moderate-to-Severe Postoperative, Traumatic, or Musculoskeletal Pain in Europe: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1