欧洲季节内温度变化趋势:站点数据与网格数据和再分析数据的比较

IF 3.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES International Journal of Climatology Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1002/joc.8512
Tomáš Krauskopf, Radan Huth
{"title":"欧洲季节内温度变化趋势:站点数据与网格数据和再分析数据的比较","authors":"Tomáš Krauskopf, Radan Huth","doi":"10.1002/joc.8512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trends in temperature variability are often referred to have higher effect on temperature extremes than trends in the mean. We investigate trends in three complementary measures of intraseasonal temperature variability: (a) standard deviation of mean daily temperature (SD), (b) mean absolute value of day‐to‐day temperature change (DTD) and (c) 1‐day lagged temporal autocorrelation of temperature (LAG). It is a well‐established fact that different types of data (station, gridded, reanalyses) provide different temperature characteristics and particularly their trends. Moreover, we have uncovered that trends in measures of variability are considerably sensitive to data inhomogeneities. Therefore, we use five different datasets, one station based (ECA&D), one gridded (EOBS) and three reanalyses (JRA‐55, NCEP/NCAR, 20CR), and compare them. The period from 1961 to 2014 where all datasets overlap is examined, and the linear regression method is utilized to calculate trends of investigated measures in summer and winter. Intraseasonal temperature variability tends to decrease in winter, especially in eastern and northern Europe, where trends below −7%·decade−1 are detected for all measures. Decreases in DTD and LAG (indicating increase in persistence) prevail also in summer while summer SD tends to increase. The increase in the width of temperature distribution and the simultaneous increase in persistence indicate a tendency towards the rise in the frequency of extended extreme events in summer. Unlike previous studies, our results imply that reanalyses are not the least accurate in determining trends. JRA‐55 appears to be the least diverging from other datasets, while the largest discrepancies are detected for DTD at station data.","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in intraseasonal temperature variability in Europe: Comparison of station data with gridded data and reanalyses\",\"authors\":\"Tomáš Krauskopf, Radan Huth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joc.8512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trends in temperature variability are often referred to have higher effect on temperature extremes than trends in the mean. We investigate trends in three complementary measures of intraseasonal temperature variability: (a) standard deviation of mean daily temperature (SD), (b) mean absolute value of day‐to‐day temperature change (DTD) and (c) 1‐day lagged temporal autocorrelation of temperature (LAG). It is a well‐established fact that different types of data (station, gridded, reanalyses) provide different temperature characteristics and particularly their trends. Moreover, we have uncovered that trends in measures of variability are considerably sensitive to data inhomogeneities. Therefore, we use five different datasets, one station based (ECA&D), one gridded (EOBS) and three reanalyses (JRA‐55, NCEP/NCAR, 20CR), and compare them. The period from 1961 to 2014 where all datasets overlap is examined, and the linear regression method is utilized to calculate trends of investigated measures in summer and winter. Intraseasonal temperature variability tends to decrease in winter, especially in eastern and northern Europe, where trends below −7%·decade−1 are detected for all measures. Decreases in DTD and LAG (indicating increase in persistence) prevail also in summer while summer SD tends to increase. The increase in the width of temperature distribution and the simultaneous increase in persistence indicate a tendency towards the rise in the frequency of extended extreme events in summer. Unlike previous studies, our results imply that reanalyses are not the least accurate in determining trends. JRA‐55 appears to be the least diverging from other datasets, while the largest discrepancies are detected for DTD at station data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8512\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气温变化趋势通常被认为比平均气温变化趋势对极端气温的影响更大。我们研究了季内气温变率的三个互补指标的变化趋势:(a) 日平均气温的标准偏差(SD);(b) 逐日气温变化的平均绝对值(DTD);(c) 滞后 1 天的气温时间自相关性(LAG)。不同类型的数据(观测站、网格数据、再分析数据)提供了不同的气温特征,尤其是其变化趋势。此外,我们还发现,测量变率的趋势对数据不均匀性相当敏感。因此,我们使用了五个不同的数据集:一个基于站点的数据集(ECA&D)、一个基于网格的数据集(EOBS)和三个基于再分析的数据集(JRA-55、NCEP/NCAR、20CR),并对它们进行了比较。对所有数据集重叠的 1961 年至 2014 年期间进行了研究,并利用线性回归法计算了夏季和冬季调查指标的趋势。冬季的季节内温度变率呈下降趋势,尤其是在东欧和北欧,所有测量值的趋势都低于-7%-decade-1。夏季的 DTD 和 LAG 也普遍下降(表明持续性增加),而夏季 SD 则呈上升趋势。温度分布宽度的增加和持续性的同时增加表明,夏季极端事件的频率有上升的趋势。与以前的研究不同,我们的结果表明,再分析在确定趋势方面并不是最不准确的。JRA-55 与其他数据集的偏差最小,而 DTD 站数据的偏差最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in intraseasonal temperature variability in Europe: Comparison of station data with gridded data and reanalyses
Trends in temperature variability are often referred to have higher effect on temperature extremes than trends in the mean. We investigate trends in three complementary measures of intraseasonal temperature variability: (a) standard deviation of mean daily temperature (SD), (b) mean absolute value of day‐to‐day temperature change (DTD) and (c) 1‐day lagged temporal autocorrelation of temperature (LAG). It is a well‐established fact that different types of data (station, gridded, reanalyses) provide different temperature characteristics and particularly their trends. Moreover, we have uncovered that trends in measures of variability are considerably sensitive to data inhomogeneities. Therefore, we use five different datasets, one station based (ECA&D), one gridded (EOBS) and three reanalyses (JRA‐55, NCEP/NCAR, 20CR), and compare them. The period from 1961 to 2014 where all datasets overlap is examined, and the linear regression method is utilized to calculate trends of investigated measures in summer and winter. Intraseasonal temperature variability tends to decrease in winter, especially in eastern and northern Europe, where trends below −7%·decade−1 are detected for all measures. Decreases in DTD and LAG (indicating increase in persistence) prevail also in summer while summer SD tends to increase. The increase in the width of temperature distribution and the simultaneous increase in persistence indicate a tendency towards the rise in the frequency of extended extreme events in summer. Unlike previous studies, our results imply that reanalyses are not the least accurate in determining trends. JRA‐55 appears to be the least diverging from other datasets, while the largest discrepancies are detected for DTD at station data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Comparison of CMIP6 model performance in estimating human thermal load in Europe in the winter season Projection of future water availability in the Amu Darya Basin Organized precipitation and associated large‐scale circulation patterns over the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1