关于莱昂-皮宁斯基对科学的同情与反感

Dagmara Skrzywanek-Jaworska
{"title":"关于莱昂-皮宁斯基对科学的同情与反感","authors":"Dagmara Skrzywanek-Jaworska","doi":"10.4467/20844131ks.24.002.19459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article delves into Leon Piniński’s academic sympathies and aversions, as manifested in his contributions to Przegląd Polski through the posthumous memoirs of Rudolf von Jhering and Bernhard Windscheid. A shared interest in Roman law and possession as a subject of research interest served as a common ground between Piniński and the memoir protagonists during a certain phase of their academic careers. The 19th-century German legal landscape witnessed a polarization of perspectives on possessio, with Savigny and his followers (including Windscheid) on one side and Jhering on the other. This dichotomy captivated Piniński, leading to his exploration of the subject and the development of his unique concept of possessio. During his foreign sojourns, Piniński wrote a German-language monograph titled Der Thatbestand des Sachbesitzerwerbs nach gemeinem Recht, a work yet to be translated into Polish. The evaluations of Jhering’s and Windscheid’s scholarly output were primarily based on Piniński’s views on the nature of possessio. Additionally, the article paints an intellectual tableau of an era whose accomplishments in the realm of legal research continue to hold relevance in contemporary discourse.","PeriodicalId":346009,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O naukowych sympatiach i antypatiach Leona Pinińskiego\",\"authors\":\"Dagmara Skrzywanek-Jaworska\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/20844131ks.24.002.19459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article delves into Leon Piniński’s academic sympathies and aversions, as manifested in his contributions to Przegląd Polski through the posthumous memoirs of Rudolf von Jhering and Bernhard Windscheid. A shared interest in Roman law and possession as a subject of research interest served as a common ground between Piniński and the memoir protagonists during a certain phase of their academic careers. The 19th-century German legal landscape witnessed a polarization of perspectives on possessio, with Savigny and his followers (including Windscheid) on one side and Jhering on the other. This dichotomy captivated Piniński, leading to his exploration of the subject and the development of his unique concept of possessio. During his foreign sojourns, Piniński wrote a German-language monograph titled Der Thatbestand des Sachbesitzerwerbs nach gemeinem Recht, a work yet to be translated into Polish. The evaluations of Jhering’s and Windscheid’s scholarly output were primarily based on Piniński’s views on the nature of possessio. Additionally, the article paints an intellectual tableau of an era whose accomplishments in the realm of legal research continue to hold relevance in contemporary discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131ks.24.002.19459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131ks.24.002.19459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过鲁道夫-冯-耶林(Rudolf von Jhering)和伯恩哈德-温沙伊德(Bernhard Windscheid)的遗作回忆录,深入探讨莱昂-皮南斯基(Leon Piniński)对学术的同情和厌恶,这种同情和厌恶体现在他为《波兰史诗》(Przegląd Polski)所作的贡献中。在学术生涯的某一阶段,皮南斯基与回忆录中的主人公对罗马法和占有权这一研究课题有着共同的兴趣。在 19 世纪的德国法律界,关于占有的观点出现了两极分化,萨维尼及其追随者(包括温德沙伊德)和耶林各占一方。这种对立吸引了皮楠斯基,促使他对这一主题进行了探索,并形成了他独特的占有权概念。在国外逗留期间,皮年斯基撰写了题为《Der Thatbestand des Sachbesitzerwerbs nach gemeinem Recht》的德语专著,这部作品尚未被翻译成波兰语。对耶林和温德沙伊德学术成果的评价主要基于皮年斯基对占有权性质的看法。此外,文章还描绘了一个时代的知识分子形象,他们在法律研究领域的成就在当代的讨论中仍具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O naukowych sympatiach i antypatiach Leona Pinińskiego
This article delves into Leon Piniński’s academic sympathies and aversions, as manifested in his contributions to Przegląd Polski through the posthumous memoirs of Rudolf von Jhering and Bernhard Windscheid. A shared interest in Roman law and possession as a subject of research interest served as a common ground between Piniński and the memoir protagonists during a certain phase of their academic careers. The 19th-century German legal landscape witnessed a polarization of perspectives on possessio, with Savigny and his followers (including Windscheid) on one side and Jhering on the other. This dichotomy captivated Piniński, leading to his exploration of the subject and the development of his unique concept of possessio. During his foreign sojourns, Piniński wrote a German-language monograph titled Der Thatbestand des Sachbesitzerwerbs nach gemeinem Recht, a work yet to be translated into Polish. The evaluations of Jhering’s and Windscheid’s scholarly output were primarily based on Piniński’s views on the nature of possessio. Additionally, the article paints an intellectual tableau of an era whose accomplishments in the realm of legal research continue to hold relevance in contemporary discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Polityk dwóch epok, taki, jakim (nie) był. Minister Tadeusz Matuszewicz i jego biografia O naukowych sympatiach i antypatiach Leona Pinińskiego „Dziedzictwo prawne. Spotkania naukowe”. Sprawozdanie z posiedzeń naukowych w roku akademickim 2022/2023 International Memorial Course Marko Petrak – Roman Legal Tradition and Contemporary Legal Systems (Dubrovnik, October 16–18, 2023) Przekład Aktu Związkowego Szwajcarii z 1291 r., sporządzony w 1941 r. w obozie uniwersyteckim w Grangeneuve (Fryburgu). Edycja źródłowa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1