利用机器学习识别死产风险

T.E.K. Cersonsky, N.K. Ayala, H. Pinar, D.J. Dudley, G.R. Saade, R.M. Silver, A.K. Lewkowitz
{"title":"利用机器学习识别死产风险","authors":"T.E.K. Cersonsky, N.K. Ayala, H. Pinar, D.J. Dudley, G.R. Saade, R.M. Silver, A.K. Lewkowitz","doi":"10.1097/01.aoa.0001015988.43986.ab","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229:327:e1–16)\n A tool that could help identify women at risk for stillbirth would be a welcome addition to clinical practice. Machine learning models, which can look at relationships between variables in large data sets, was investigated in this article. This study’s aim was to refine a machine learning model to predict stillbirth using data available prior to the gestational age of viability (22 to 24 wk). The researchers performed a secondary analysis of data in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN), a study database of 982 stillbirths and 3000 representative live births from 2006 to 2009. The study included patients who delivered a live or stillborn fetus at >18 weeks’ gestation from 59 hospitals in 5 states (Georgia, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Texas, and Utah). The data set included 6000 measures collected from interviews with the mother, postmortem pathological exam, cause of death analysis, and medical record Abstractsion. Subsequently 101 risk factor variables were identified and used in the model. These included maternal and biological father demographics, family history, maternal health history, prenatal lab data, fetal genetics, second-trimester screen, prenatal care history, ultrasound, and social determinants of health.","PeriodicalId":19432,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Risk of Stillbirth Using Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"T.E.K. Cersonsky, N.K. Ayala, H. Pinar, D.J. Dudley, G.R. Saade, R.M. Silver, A.K. Lewkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aoa.0001015988.43986.ab\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229:327:e1–16)\\n A tool that could help identify women at risk for stillbirth would be a welcome addition to clinical practice. Machine learning models, which can look at relationships between variables in large data sets, was investigated in this article. This study’s aim was to refine a machine learning model to predict stillbirth using data available prior to the gestational age of viability (22 to 24 wk). The researchers performed a secondary analysis of data in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN), a study database of 982 stillbirths and 3000 representative live births from 2006 to 2009. The study included patients who delivered a live or stillborn fetus at >18 weeks’ gestation from 59 hospitals in 5 states (Georgia, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Texas, and Utah). The data set included 6000 measures collected from interviews with the mother, postmortem pathological exam, cause of death analysis, and medical record Abstractsion. Subsequently 101 risk factor variables were identified and used in the model. These included maternal and biological father demographics, family history, maternal health history, prenatal lab data, fetal genetics, second-trimester screen, prenatal care history, ultrasound, and social determinants of health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001015988.43986.ab\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001015988.43986.ab","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229:327:e1-16)一种能帮助识别死产风险妇女的工具将是临床实践中一个受欢迎的补充。本文对机器学习模型进行了研究,该模型可以研究大型数据集中变量之间的关系。这项研究的目的是改进机器学习模型,利用可存活胎龄(22 到 24 周)之前的数据预测死产。研究人员对死胎合作研究网络(SCRN)中的数据进行了二次分析,该研究数据库收录了2006年至2009年间的982例死胎和3000例有代表性的活产。研究对象包括 5 个州(佐治亚州、马萨诸塞州、罗德岛州、得克萨斯州和犹他州)59 家医院中妊娠大于 18 周的活产或死胎患者。数据集包括从母亲访谈、死后病理检查、死因分析和病历摘要中收集的 6000 个测量指标。随后,101 个风险因素变量被确定并用于模型中。这些变量包括母亲和生父的人口统计学特征、家族史、母亲健康史、产前实验室数据、胎儿遗传学、二胎筛查、产前护理史、超声波和健康的社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Risk of Stillbirth Using Machine Learning
(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229:327:e1–16) A tool that could help identify women at risk for stillbirth would be a welcome addition to clinical practice. Machine learning models, which can look at relationships between variables in large data sets, was investigated in this article. This study’s aim was to refine a machine learning model to predict stillbirth using data available prior to the gestational age of viability (22 to 24 wk). The researchers performed a secondary analysis of data in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN), a study database of 982 stillbirths and 3000 representative live births from 2006 to 2009. The study included patients who delivered a live or stillborn fetus at >18 weeks’ gestation from 59 hospitals in 5 states (Georgia, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Texas, and Utah). The data set included 6000 measures collected from interviews with the mother, postmortem pathological exam, cause of death analysis, and medical record Abstractsion. Subsequently 101 risk factor variables were identified and used in the model. These included maternal and biological father demographics, family history, maternal health history, prenatal lab data, fetal genetics, second-trimester screen, prenatal care history, ultrasound, and social determinants of health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of the US Affordable Care Act-Dependent Coverage Provision With Labor Neuraxial Analgesia Use Why Anesthetists Should Care About Postnatal Care Perinatal Outcomes and the Role of Obstetric Anesthesia Interventions Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent Wound Complications Following Cesarean Delivery in High-Risk Obstetric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Quality of Recovery Following Childbirth: A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1