Clinical Triggers and Vital Signs Influencing Crisis Acknowledgment and Calls for Help by Anesthesiologists: A Simulation-Based Observational Study

(J Clin Anesth. 2023;90:111235 |https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111235) Swiftly mobilizing resources in perioperative emergencies is crucial for patient survival, with anesthesiologists typically bearing this responsibility. Recognizing the urgency, the call for help is emphasized through formalized “stat” calls. However, the timing of seeking assistance remains subjective, posing a challenge. While empirical evidence highlights blood pressure thresholds indicative of harm, ambiguity surrounds terms like “early” in crisis management. An assumption that anesthesiologists must possess all answers hinders timely collaboration, impacting patient care. Factors affecting crisis acknowledgment, especially in simulated settings, were explored among MOCA course participants. Acknowledgment, a pivotal step in emergency response, was scrutinized alongside potential differences between active participants and observers. This investigation seeks to expose vulnerabilities in ACRM implementation, guiding future studies on crisis management in perioperative settings.