P.096 用于后窝颅底大肿瘤显微外科切除术的部分迷走神经切断术(labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy)的听力保护和生活质量结果

J. Kam, C. Hounjet, S. Makarenko, B. Brakel, A. Rebchuk, M. Castle-Kirszbaum, R. Akagami
{"title":"P.096 用于后窝颅底大肿瘤显微外科切除术的部分迷走神经切断术(labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy)的听力保护和生活质量结果","authors":"J. Kam, C. Hounjet, S. Makarenko, B. Brakel, A. Rebchuk, M. Castle-Kirszbaum, R. Akagami","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Partial Labyrinthectomy Petrous Apicectomy (PLPA) aims to give transpetrosal access whilst preserving hearing for challenging tumors such as petroclival meningioma. There are few studies assessing resection and morbidity and no large studies that document hearing preservation and quality of life (QOL). We present the first large series to do so. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all PLPA cases between 2005 and 2023 at a tertiary center. Demographics, tumor characteristics, neuromonitoring, hearing and surgical outcomes were collected. QOL was measured with the 36-item short form survey (SF-36). Results: Of 73 PLPAs, data for 56 patients undergoing 57 surgeries was obtained. Petroclival meningioma (57.8%) and epidermoid tumors (21.0%) were common indications . The mean patient age and tumor size were 51.6 years and 44mm. Gross total resection was achieved in 40.3%, near total in 15.8% and subtotal in 43.8% of cases with no perioperative mortality and was not influenced by attempted hearing preservation (p=0.183). Of 39 hearing preservation cases, 27 (69.2%) were preserved, 10 (25.6%) were lost and 2 had unclear outcomes. Conclusions: Improved microsurgery and neuromonitoring during PLPA leads to decreased mortality and morbidity compared to historical cohorts while achieving a high rate of resection, hearing preservation and maintained QOL.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"85 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P.096 Hearing preservation and quality of life outcomes in partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy for microsurgical resection of large posterior fossa skullbase tumors\",\"authors\":\"J. Kam, C. Hounjet, S. Makarenko, B. Brakel, A. Rebchuk, M. Castle-Kirszbaum, R. Akagami\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Partial Labyrinthectomy Petrous Apicectomy (PLPA) aims to give transpetrosal access whilst preserving hearing for challenging tumors such as petroclival meningioma. There are few studies assessing resection and morbidity and no large studies that document hearing preservation and quality of life (QOL). We present the first large series to do so. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all PLPA cases between 2005 and 2023 at a tertiary center. Demographics, tumor characteristics, neuromonitoring, hearing and surgical outcomes were collected. QOL was measured with the 36-item short form survey (SF-36). Results: Of 73 PLPAs, data for 56 patients undergoing 57 surgeries was obtained. Petroclival meningioma (57.8%) and epidermoid tumors (21.0%) were common indications . The mean patient age and tumor size were 51.6 years and 44mm. Gross total resection was achieved in 40.3%, near total in 15.8% and subtotal in 43.8% of cases with no perioperative mortality and was not influenced by attempted hearing preservation (p=0.183). Of 39 hearing preservation cases, 27 (69.2%) were preserved, 10 (25.6%) were lost and 2 had unclear outcomes. Conclusions: Improved microsurgery and neuromonitoring during PLPA leads to decreased mortality and morbidity compared to historical cohorts while achieving a high rate of resection, hearing preservation and maintained QOL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"volume\":\"85 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:迷走神经部分切除术(PLPA)的目的是为瓣膜脑膜瘤等高难度肿瘤提供经颅骨入路,同时保留听力。很少有研究对切除术和发病率进行评估,也没有大型研究对听力保护和生活质量(QOL)进行记录。我们介绍了首例大型系列研究。方法:我们对一家三级医院 2005 年至 2023 年期间的所有 PLPA 病例进行了回顾性研究。收集了人口统计学、肿瘤特征、神经监测、听力和手术结果。采用 36 项简表调查(SF-36)测量 QOL。结果:在 73 例 PLPA 中,获得了 56 例患者的数据,共进行了 57 次手术。瓣膜脑膜瘤(57.8%)和表皮肿瘤(21.0%)是常见的适应症。患者的平均年龄和肿瘤大小分别为 51.6 岁和 44 毫米。40.3%的病例实现了全切,15.8%的病例接近全切,43.8%的病例实现了次全切,围手术期无死亡病例,且不受试图保留听力的影响(P=0.183)。在 39 例保留听力的病例中,27 例(69.2%)保留了听力,10 例(25.6%)丧失了听力,2 例结果不明。结论在 PLPA 期间改进显微手术和神经监测可降低死亡率和发病率,同时实现较高的切除率、听力保留率和 QOL 维持率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P.096 Hearing preservation and quality of life outcomes in partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy for microsurgical resection of large posterior fossa skullbase tumors
Background: The Partial Labyrinthectomy Petrous Apicectomy (PLPA) aims to give transpetrosal access whilst preserving hearing for challenging tumors such as petroclival meningioma. There are few studies assessing resection and morbidity and no large studies that document hearing preservation and quality of life (QOL). We present the first large series to do so. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all PLPA cases between 2005 and 2023 at a tertiary center. Demographics, tumor characteristics, neuromonitoring, hearing and surgical outcomes were collected. QOL was measured with the 36-item short form survey (SF-36). Results: Of 73 PLPAs, data for 56 patients undergoing 57 surgeries was obtained. Petroclival meningioma (57.8%) and epidermoid tumors (21.0%) were common indications . The mean patient age and tumor size were 51.6 years and 44mm. Gross total resection was achieved in 40.3%, near total in 15.8% and subtotal in 43.8% of cases with no perioperative mortality and was not influenced by attempted hearing preservation (p=0.183). Of 39 hearing preservation cases, 27 (69.2%) were preserved, 10 (25.6%) were lost and 2 had unclear outcomes. Conclusions: Improved microsurgery and neuromonitoring during PLPA leads to decreased mortality and morbidity compared to historical cohorts while achieving a high rate of resection, hearing preservation and maintained QOL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
B.2 Time from symptom onset and number of health care encounters prior to diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis D.6 Neurological care and outcomes of pregnant patients with epilepsy in a Canadian tertiary care center (2014-2020) F.4 Anatomical assessment and comparative analysis of ventricular access points in pterional approach: a cadaveric study P.077 Reducing artifact during in bi-directional brain interfacing P.006 Barriers and risk factors for emergency room visits vs smartphone app use for migraine in Canada and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1