P.114 焦虑和抑郁症状筛查对轻度脑外伤患者预后的影响

PA Bastone, J. Marcoux, M. Laguë-Beauvais
{"title":"P.114 焦虑和抑郁症状筛查对轻度脑外伤患者预后的影响","authors":"PA Bastone, J. Marcoux, M. Laguë-Beauvais","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An estimated 27-69 million individuals worldwide sustain a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) each year, making it an important public health concern. Many victims experience post-injury neuropsychological issues such as anxiety and depression, which are associated with more post-concussive symptoms and worse functional outcomes. We sought to determine a systematic process to document the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms in mTBI patients to prevent negative impacts on their recovery. Methods: We administered the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESDR-10) questionnaires, no more than three months after injury, to screen for these symptoms. A retrospective chart review was performed for 328 patients from the Montreal General Hospital mTBI Clinic who either received these questionnaires (N=143, Mage=40.36, SDage=15.557, Nfemale=90, Nmale=53) or did not (N=185, Mage=41.17, SDage=16.449, Nfemale=114, Nmale=71). The number of interventions received between groups were compared using ANOVA. Results: Patients who received the questionnaires (M=1.34, SD=0.978) were referred to significantly more interventions than those who did not (M=0.90, SD=0.876, p<0.001) and the rate of referral positively correlated with GAD-7 and CESDR-10 scores. Conclusions: Screening for symptoms of anxiety and depression post mTBI helps clinicians refer patients to the appropriate resources, which in turn should improve outcome.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"39 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P.114 The impact of screening for anxious and depressive symptoms on the outcome of patients with a mild traumatic brain injury\",\"authors\":\"PA Bastone, J. Marcoux, M. Laguë-Beauvais\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: An estimated 27-69 million individuals worldwide sustain a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) each year, making it an important public health concern. Many victims experience post-injury neuropsychological issues such as anxiety and depression, which are associated with more post-concussive symptoms and worse functional outcomes. We sought to determine a systematic process to document the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms in mTBI patients to prevent negative impacts on their recovery. Methods: We administered the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESDR-10) questionnaires, no more than three months after injury, to screen for these symptoms. A retrospective chart review was performed for 328 patients from the Montreal General Hospital mTBI Clinic who either received these questionnaires (N=143, Mage=40.36, SDage=15.557, Nfemale=90, Nmale=53) or did not (N=185, Mage=41.17, SDage=16.449, Nfemale=114, Nmale=71). The number of interventions received between groups were compared using ANOVA. Results: Patients who received the questionnaires (M=1.34, SD=0.978) were referred to significantly more interventions than those who did not (M=0.90, SD=0.876, p<0.001) and the rate of referral positively correlated with GAD-7 and CESDR-10 scores. Conclusions: Screening for symptoms of anxiety and depression post mTBI helps clinicians refer patients to the appropriate resources, which in turn should improve outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"volume\":\"39 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据估计,全球每年有 2,700 万至 6,900 万人遭受轻微创伤性脑损伤(mTBI),这已成为一个重要的公共卫生问题。许多受害者在受伤后会出现神经心理问题,如焦虑和抑郁,这与更多的脑震荡后症状和更差的功能性结果有关。我们试图确定一个系统的流程来记录 mTBI 患者是否存在焦虑和抑郁症状,以防止对其康复造成负面影响。方法:我们在伤后不超过三个月的时间内发放了广泛性焦虑症-7(GAD-7)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表修订版(CESDR-10)问卷,以筛查这些症状。我们对蒙特利尔综合医院 mTBI 诊所的 328 名患者进行了回顾性病历审查,这些患者有的接受了这些问卷调查(N=143,Mage=40.36,SDage=15.557,Nfemale=90,Nmale=53),有的没有接受(N=185,Mage=41.17,SDage=16.449,Nfemale=114,Nmale=71)。采用方差分析比较各组接受干预的次数。结果接受问卷调查的患者(M=1.34,SD=0.978)转介干预的次数明显多于未接受问卷调查的患者(M=0.90,SD=0.876,P<0.001),且转介率与 GAD-7 和 CESDR-10 评分呈正相关。结论筛查 mTBI 后的焦虑和抑郁症状有助于临床医生将患者转介到适当的资源,从而改善治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P.114 The impact of screening for anxious and depressive symptoms on the outcome of patients with a mild traumatic brain injury
Background: An estimated 27-69 million individuals worldwide sustain a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) each year, making it an important public health concern. Many victims experience post-injury neuropsychological issues such as anxiety and depression, which are associated with more post-concussive symptoms and worse functional outcomes. We sought to determine a systematic process to document the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms in mTBI patients to prevent negative impacts on their recovery. Methods: We administered the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESDR-10) questionnaires, no more than three months after injury, to screen for these symptoms. A retrospective chart review was performed for 328 patients from the Montreal General Hospital mTBI Clinic who either received these questionnaires (N=143, Mage=40.36, SDage=15.557, Nfemale=90, Nmale=53) or did not (N=185, Mage=41.17, SDage=16.449, Nfemale=114, Nmale=71). The number of interventions received between groups were compared using ANOVA. Results: Patients who received the questionnaires (M=1.34, SD=0.978) were referred to significantly more interventions than those who did not (M=0.90, SD=0.876, p<0.001) and the rate of referral positively correlated with GAD-7 and CESDR-10 scores. Conclusions: Screening for symptoms of anxiety and depression post mTBI helps clinicians refer patients to the appropriate resources, which in turn should improve outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
B.2 Time from symptom onset and number of health care encounters prior to diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis D.6 Neurological care and outcomes of pregnant patients with epilepsy in a Canadian tertiary care center (2014-2020) F.4 Anatomical assessment and comparative analysis of ventricular access points in pterional approach: a cadaveric study P.077 Reducing artifact during in bi-directional brain interfacing P.006 Barriers and risk factors for emergency room visits vs smartphone app use for migraine in Canada and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1