白色篱笆:千禧一代和婴儿潮一代如何看待美国梦

IF 3.5 Q2 BUSINESS Young Consumers Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1108/yc-10-2023-1886
Kristin Scott, Juan Meng, Ann Kuzma
{"title":"白色篱笆:千禧一代和婴儿潮一代如何看待美国梦","authors":"Kristin Scott, Juan Meng, Ann Kuzma","doi":"10.1108/yc-10-2023-1886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe American Dream is tightly woven into the American culture and way of life. Despite the importance and ubiquitous nature of the American Dream, the topic is difficult to define and belief in the attainability of the American Dream changes over time. Because of the little academic research on the topic, this study aims to fill this gap and investigate what people think about the American Dream and what factors influence the perception that this concept is outdated among different two generations – Baby Boomers and Millennials.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn online survey containing both open-ended and close-ended questions was conducted in two age groups via Qualtrics – 245 Millennials (born 1980–1996) and 253 Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964). Open-ended questions were analyzed using NVivo and closed-ended questions were analyzed using SPSS. Items on the online survey measured the definition of the American Dream, factors in defining it, the relevancy and attainability of the Dream, whether it was outdated, as well as Schwartz’s list of values (Lindeman and Verkasalo, 2005).\n\nFindings\nThree research questions were investigated. First, the results show that Baby Boomers and Millennials define the Dream similarly in terms of a house, family, happiness, freedom and equality. Second, they differ, however, in whether they believe that the Dream is relevant and attainable. Specifically, only Baby Boomers believe that the Dream is still relevant, but both generations believe that it is harder for younger generations to achieve the Dream. Third, the authors found similarities and differences in terms of demographics and values predicting whether the two generations believed that the Dream is outdated, and new values should be added. For both generations, values were more likely to predict the belief that the Dream was outdated. Using Schwartz’s values, those high in universalism were more likely to believe that the Dream was outdated and that new values should be added to the definition of the Dream for both generations. The values of security, self-direction, achievement and benevolence differed between the generations in believing that the Dream was outdated and that new values should be added.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research provides insight into how these macrolevel beliefs influence people at the microlevel and how businesses or public policymakers can use these concepts to influence attitudes or behaviors.\n","PeriodicalId":46660,"journal":{"name":"Young Consumers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The white picket fence: how Millennials and Baby Boomers view the American Dream\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Scott, Juan Meng, Ann Kuzma\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/yc-10-2023-1886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThe American Dream is tightly woven into the American culture and way of life. Despite the importance and ubiquitous nature of the American Dream, the topic is difficult to define and belief in the attainability of the American Dream changes over time. Because of the little academic research on the topic, this study aims to fill this gap and investigate what people think about the American Dream and what factors influence the perception that this concept is outdated among different two generations – Baby Boomers and Millennials.\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nAn online survey containing both open-ended and close-ended questions was conducted in two age groups via Qualtrics – 245 Millennials (born 1980–1996) and 253 Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964). Open-ended questions were analyzed using NVivo and closed-ended questions were analyzed using SPSS. Items on the online survey measured the definition of the American Dream, factors in defining it, the relevancy and attainability of the Dream, whether it was outdated, as well as Schwartz’s list of values (Lindeman and Verkasalo, 2005).\\n\\nFindings\\nThree research questions were investigated. First, the results show that Baby Boomers and Millennials define the Dream similarly in terms of a house, family, happiness, freedom and equality. Second, they differ, however, in whether they believe that the Dream is relevant and attainable. Specifically, only Baby Boomers believe that the Dream is still relevant, but both generations believe that it is harder for younger generations to achieve the Dream. Third, the authors found similarities and differences in terms of demographics and values predicting whether the two generations believed that the Dream is outdated, and new values should be added. For both generations, values were more likely to predict the belief that the Dream was outdated. Using Schwartz’s values, those high in universalism were more likely to believe that the Dream was outdated and that new values should be added to the definition of the Dream for both generations. The values of security, self-direction, achievement and benevolence differed between the generations in believing that the Dream was outdated and that new values should be added.\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research provides insight into how these macrolevel beliefs influence people at the microlevel and how businesses or public policymakers can use these concepts to influence attitudes or behaviors.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Young Consumers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Young Consumers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-10-2023-1886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Young Consumers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-10-2023-1886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 "美国梦 "与美国文化和生活方式紧密相连。尽管 "美国梦 "非常重要且无处不在,但这一主题却很难界定,人们对实现 "美国梦 "的信念也会随着时间的推移而改变。由于有关该主题的学术研究很少,本研究旨在填补这一空白,调查人们对 "美国梦 "的看法,以及哪些因素会影响 "婴儿潮 "一代和 "千禧一代 "这两代人对 "美国梦 "过时的看法。开放式问题使用 NVivo 进行分析,封闭式问题使用 SPSS 进行分析。在线调查的项目测量了 "美国梦 "的定义、定义 "美国梦 "的因素、"美国梦 "的相关性和可实现性、"美国梦 "是否过时以及 Schwartz 的价值清单(Lindeman 和 Verkasalo,2005 年)。首先,研究结果表明,"婴儿潮一代 "和 "千禧一代 "对 "梦想 "的定义相似,都是房子、家庭、幸福、自由和平等。其次,他们在是否认为 "梦想 "是相关的和可实现的方面存在差异。具体来说,只有婴儿潮一代认为 "梦想 "仍然具有现实意义,但两代人都认为年轻一代要实现 "梦想 "更加困难。第三,作者发现,在预测两代人是否认为 "梦想 "已经过时,是否应该增加新的价值观方面,人口统计学和价值观有异曲同工之妙。对于两代人来说,价值观更有可能预测 "梦想 "是否过时。根据施瓦茨的价值观,普遍主义程度高的人更有可能认为 "梦想 "已经过时,两代人都应在 "梦想 "的定义中加入新的价值观。在认为 "梦想 "已经过时和应该增加新的价值观方面,安全、自我导向、成就和仁爱的价值观在两代人之间存在差异。 原创性/价值这项研究深入探讨了这些宏观层面的信念如何在微观层面影响人们,以及企业或公共政策制定者如何利用这些概念来影响人们的态度或行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The white picket fence: how Millennials and Baby Boomers view the American Dream
Purpose The American Dream is tightly woven into the American culture and way of life. Despite the importance and ubiquitous nature of the American Dream, the topic is difficult to define and belief in the attainability of the American Dream changes over time. Because of the little academic research on the topic, this study aims to fill this gap and investigate what people think about the American Dream and what factors influence the perception that this concept is outdated among different two generations – Baby Boomers and Millennials. Design/methodology/approach An online survey containing both open-ended and close-ended questions was conducted in two age groups via Qualtrics – 245 Millennials (born 1980–1996) and 253 Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964). Open-ended questions were analyzed using NVivo and closed-ended questions were analyzed using SPSS. Items on the online survey measured the definition of the American Dream, factors in defining it, the relevancy and attainability of the Dream, whether it was outdated, as well as Schwartz’s list of values (Lindeman and Verkasalo, 2005). Findings Three research questions were investigated. First, the results show that Baby Boomers and Millennials define the Dream similarly in terms of a house, family, happiness, freedom and equality. Second, they differ, however, in whether they believe that the Dream is relevant and attainable. Specifically, only Baby Boomers believe that the Dream is still relevant, but both generations believe that it is harder for younger generations to achieve the Dream. Third, the authors found similarities and differences in terms of demographics and values predicting whether the two generations believed that the Dream is outdated, and new values should be added. For both generations, values were more likely to predict the belief that the Dream was outdated. Using Schwartz’s values, those high in universalism were more likely to believe that the Dream was outdated and that new values should be added to the definition of the Dream for both generations. The values of security, self-direction, achievement and benevolence differed between the generations in believing that the Dream was outdated and that new values should be added. Originality/value This research provides insight into how these macrolevel beliefs influence people at the microlevel and how businesses or public policymakers can use these concepts to influence attitudes or behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Young Consumers
Young Consumers BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
“Do you practice what you preach?” The effects of celebrities’ pro-environmental messages on social media on young adults’ pro-environmental behavior Environmental sustainability in the digital age: unraveling the effect of social media on green purchase intention Drivers of consumer trust in mHealth apps among young consumers: a socio-technical approach Do business-wide sustainability labels boost consumer trust and enhance perceptions of sustainability information quality? An experiment among Z-generation members How does the influencers' country of origin affect online brand advocacy among young consumers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1