快讯信息框架对改变餐厅食客植物性肉类消费的有效性

Pearl M.C. Lin, Ada Lo, W. Au, Regina Wang
{"title":"快讯信息框架对改变餐厅食客植物性肉类消费的有效性","authors":"Pearl M.C. Lin, Ada Lo, W. Au, Regina Wang","doi":"10.1177/10963480241259909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on regulatory fit theory, construal level theory, and means-end theory, this research examined the effects of message framing, message information, and message description on restaurant diners’ consumption intentions (CI) and the amount they would be willing to pay more ($WTP) for a plant-based diet. The study employed a mixed between-within-group methodology with a micro-longitudinal 2 (gain vs. loss framing) × 2 (health vs. environment information) × 2 (attribute-based vs. benefit-based description) scenario-based experimental design. An analysis of 361 survey responses revealed that health information should be conveyed through gain-framed messages with benefit-based descriptions, whereas environment information should be conveyed through loss-framed messages with attribute-based descriptions. These results enriched our understanding of diners’ attitudes towards plant-based meat consumption. Findings laid a theoretical foundation for future studies and present practical implications for the hospitality industry.","PeriodicalId":369021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Effectiveness of message framing in changing restaurant diners’ plant-based meat consumption\",\"authors\":\"Pearl M.C. Lin, Ada Lo, W. Au, Regina Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10963480241259909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on regulatory fit theory, construal level theory, and means-end theory, this research examined the effects of message framing, message information, and message description on restaurant diners’ consumption intentions (CI) and the amount they would be willing to pay more ($WTP) for a plant-based diet. The study employed a mixed between-within-group methodology with a micro-longitudinal 2 (gain vs. loss framing) × 2 (health vs. environment information) × 2 (attribute-based vs. benefit-based description) scenario-based experimental design. An analysis of 361 survey responses revealed that health information should be conveyed through gain-framed messages with benefit-based descriptions, whereas environment information should be conveyed through loss-framed messages with attribute-based descriptions. These results enriched our understanding of diners’ attitudes towards plant-based meat consumption. Findings laid a theoretical foundation for future studies and present practical implications for the hospitality industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241259909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241259909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究借鉴监管契合理论、构想水平理论和手段-目的理论,考察了信息框架、信息信息和信息描述对餐厅食客的消费意向(CI)以及他们愿意为植物性饮食多支付的金额(WTP 美元)的影响。研究采用了组间-组内混合方法,并采用了微观纵向 2(收益与损失框架)×2(健康与环境信息)×2(基于属性的描述与基于收益的描述)情景实验设计。对 361 份调查回复的分析表明,健康信息应通过基于收益描述的收益框架信息来传达,而环境信息则应通过基于属性描述的损失框架信息来传达。这些结果丰富了我们对食客对植物性肉类消费态度的理解。研究结果为今后的研究奠定了理论基础,并对餐饮业产生了实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: Effectiveness of message framing in changing restaurant diners’ plant-based meat consumption
Drawing on regulatory fit theory, construal level theory, and means-end theory, this research examined the effects of message framing, message information, and message description on restaurant diners’ consumption intentions (CI) and the amount they would be willing to pay more ($WTP) for a plant-based diet. The study employed a mixed between-within-group methodology with a micro-longitudinal 2 (gain vs. loss framing) × 2 (health vs. environment information) × 2 (attribute-based vs. benefit-based description) scenario-based experimental design. An analysis of 361 survey responses revealed that health information should be conveyed through gain-framed messages with benefit-based descriptions, whereas environment information should be conveyed through loss-framed messages with attribute-based descriptions. These results enriched our understanding of diners’ attitudes towards plant-based meat consumption. Findings laid a theoretical foundation for future studies and present practical implications for the hospitality industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Do Repeat Customers Effectively Attract New Customers? Reconsidering Customer Influence Value of Repeat Customers Understanding and Employing Formative Constructs: Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Threats of Misspecification Rethinking Travel Companionship: An Alternative Conceptual Model and Future Research Agenda EXPRESS: Effectiveness of message framing in changing restaurant diners’ plant-based meat consumption Biophilic Urban Hotel Design and Restorative Experiencescapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1