Ailen Oktaviana Hambalie, E. Norahmawati, Agustina A. Endharti, Diah Prabawati Retnani, N. Rahmadiani
{"title":"印度尼西亚玛琅赛义夫-安瓦尔博士地区公立医院非霍奇金淋巴瘤和霍奇金淋巴瘤中 STAT3 的表达及其与 PD-L1 表达的相关性","authors":"Ailen Oktaviana Hambalie, E. Norahmawati, Agustina A. Endharti, Diah Prabawati Retnani, N. Rahmadiani","doi":"10.1155/2024/7989996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Lymphomas are malignant lymphocyte neoplasms that globally account for 10% of cancers in individuals aged <20 years. Malignant lymphomas are divided into Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Despite the availability of many therapeutic modalities for lymphoma, such as Brentuximab vedotin, Nivolumab, and Pembrolizumab, it is still necessary to identify appropriate strategies with minimal side effects. Immunotherapy is a promising approach, exemplified by targeting JAK/STAT3 signaling, which can inhibit tumor growth and enhance antitumor immune responses. Hence, STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) is a promising therapeutic target. PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), an immune checkpoint molecule, is used as a frontline treatment for various cancers. This study aims to determine STAT3 expression and its correlation with PD-L1 expression in NHL and HL to serve as a basis for further research on anti-STAT3 and its combination with other therapy targets. Methods. Samples were obtained from paraffin blocks of patients with confirmed diagnoses of NHL and HL, and then immunohistochemical staining was carried out with PD-L1 and STAT3 antibodies. The collected data were then analyzed using SPSS. Results. Among the 10 HL patients, no patients (0%) expressed STAT3, while nine patients (90%) expressed PD-L1. Among the 10 NHL patients, 1 patient (10%) expressed STAT3, while six patients (60%) expressed PD-L1. There were no significant differences in STAT3 expression and PD-L1 expression between HL patients and NHL patients. There was no correlation between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL because almost all STAT3 expressions were negative. Conclusion. Although this study revealed no differences between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL and no significant correlation between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL, this may serve as the basis for understanding the role of STAT3 and PD-L1 in the regulation of HL and NHL, which may be useful for further research targeting STAT3 and PD-L1 immunotherapy in HL and NHL.","PeriodicalId":7325,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology","volume":"32 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STAT3 Expression and Its Correlation with PD-L1 Expression in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Hodgkin’s Lymphoma at Dr. Saiful Anwar Regional Public Hospital in Malang, Indonesian Population\",\"authors\":\"Ailen Oktaviana Hambalie, E. Norahmawati, Agustina A. Endharti, Diah Prabawati Retnani, N. Rahmadiani\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7989996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Lymphomas are malignant lymphocyte neoplasms that globally account for 10% of cancers in individuals aged <20 years. Malignant lymphomas are divided into Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Despite the availability of many therapeutic modalities for lymphoma, such as Brentuximab vedotin, Nivolumab, and Pembrolizumab, it is still necessary to identify appropriate strategies with minimal side effects. Immunotherapy is a promising approach, exemplified by targeting JAK/STAT3 signaling, which can inhibit tumor growth and enhance antitumor immune responses. Hence, STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) is a promising therapeutic target. PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), an immune checkpoint molecule, is used as a frontline treatment for various cancers. This study aims to determine STAT3 expression and its correlation with PD-L1 expression in NHL and HL to serve as a basis for further research on anti-STAT3 and its combination with other therapy targets. Methods. Samples were obtained from paraffin blocks of patients with confirmed diagnoses of NHL and HL, and then immunohistochemical staining was carried out with PD-L1 and STAT3 antibodies. The collected data were then analyzed using SPSS. Results. Among the 10 HL patients, no patients (0%) expressed STAT3, while nine patients (90%) expressed PD-L1. Among the 10 NHL patients, 1 patient (10%) expressed STAT3, while six patients (60%) expressed PD-L1. There were no significant differences in STAT3 expression and PD-L1 expression between HL patients and NHL patients. There was no correlation between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL because almost all STAT3 expressions were negative. Conclusion. Although this study revealed no differences between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL and no significant correlation between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL, this may serve as the basis for understanding the role of STAT3 and PD-L1 in the regulation of HL and NHL, which may be useful for further research targeting STAT3 and PD-L1 immunotherapy in HL and NHL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Hematology\",\"volume\":\"32 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7989996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7989996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。淋巴瘤是恶性淋巴细胞肿瘤,占全球20岁以下人群癌症发病率的10%。恶性淋巴瘤分为霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)。尽管目前已有许多治疗淋巴瘤的方法,如 Brentuximab vedotin、Nivolumab 和 Pembrolizumab,但仍有必要确定副作用最小的适当策略。免疫疗法是一种很有前景的方法,以JAK/STAT3信号为靶点就是一个例子,它可以抑制肿瘤生长并增强抗肿瘤免疫反应。因此,STAT3(信号转导和转录激活因子 3)是一个很有前景的治疗靶点。PD-L1(程序性死亡配体 1)是一种免疫检查点分子,被用作各种癌症的一线治疗药物。本研究旨在确定 STAT3 在 NHL 和 HL 中的表达及其与 PD-L1 表达的相关性,为进一步研究抗 STAT3 及其与其他治疗靶点的结合奠定基础。研究方法样本取自确诊为 NHL 和 HL 患者的石蜡块,然后用 PD-L1 和 STAT3 抗体进行免疫组化染色。然后使用 SPSS 对收集的数据进行分析。结果在10例HL患者中,没有患者(0%)表达STAT3,而9例患者(90%)表达PD-L1。在 10 名 NHL 患者中,1 名患者(10%)表达 STAT3,而 6 名患者(60%)表达 PD-L1。HL患者和NHL患者的STAT3表达和PD-L1表达无明显差异。STAT3 和 PD-L1 在 HL 和 NHL 中的表达没有相关性,因为几乎所有的 STAT3 表达都是阴性的。结论尽管本研究发现 STAT3 和 PD-L1 在 HL 和 NHL 中的表达没有差异,STAT3 和 PD-L1 在 HL 和 NHL 中的表达也没有显著相关性,但这可作为了解 STAT3 和 PD-L1 在 HL 和 NHL 的调控中的作用的基础,这可能有助于进一步研究针对 STAT3 和 PD-L1 在 HL 和 NHL 中的免疫疗法。
STAT3 Expression and Its Correlation with PD-L1 Expression in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Hodgkin’s Lymphoma at Dr. Saiful Anwar Regional Public Hospital in Malang, Indonesian Population
Background. Lymphomas are malignant lymphocyte neoplasms that globally account for 10% of cancers in individuals aged <20 years. Malignant lymphomas are divided into Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Despite the availability of many therapeutic modalities for lymphoma, such as Brentuximab vedotin, Nivolumab, and Pembrolizumab, it is still necessary to identify appropriate strategies with minimal side effects. Immunotherapy is a promising approach, exemplified by targeting JAK/STAT3 signaling, which can inhibit tumor growth and enhance antitumor immune responses. Hence, STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) is a promising therapeutic target. PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), an immune checkpoint molecule, is used as a frontline treatment for various cancers. This study aims to determine STAT3 expression and its correlation with PD-L1 expression in NHL and HL to serve as a basis for further research on anti-STAT3 and its combination with other therapy targets. Methods. Samples were obtained from paraffin blocks of patients with confirmed diagnoses of NHL and HL, and then immunohistochemical staining was carried out with PD-L1 and STAT3 antibodies. The collected data were then analyzed using SPSS. Results. Among the 10 HL patients, no patients (0%) expressed STAT3, while nine patients (90%) expressed PD-L1. Among the 10 NHL patients, 1 patient (10%) expressed STAT3, while six patients (60%) expressed PD-L1. There were no significant differences in STAT3 expression and PD-L1 expression between HL patients and NHL patients. There was no correlation between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL because almost all STAT3 expressions were negative. Conclusion. Although this study revealed no differences between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL and no significant correlation between STAT3 and PD-L1 expression in HL and NHL, this may serve as the basis for understanding the role of STAT3 and PD-L1 in the regulation of HL and NHL, which may be useful for further research targeting STAT3 and PD-L1 immunotherapy in HL and NHL.