中美全球竞争与越南在南海冲突中的战略选择困境

Nguyen Manh Cuong, Kaddour Chelabi, Safia Anjum, Navya Gubbi Sateeshchandra, Svitlana Samoylenko, Kangwa Silwizya, Tran Nghiem
{"title":"中美全球竞争与越南在南海冲突中的战略选择困境","authors":"Nguyen Manh Cuong, Kaddour Chelabi, Safia Anjum, Navya Gubbi Sateeshchandra, Svitlana Samoylenko, Kangwa Silwizya, Tran Nghiem","doi":"10.37868/hsd.v6i1.550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South China Sea (SCS) conflict has become a critical factor for regional peace and development with growing geopolitical competition between China and the USA. To face the rising threat of China, the study argues that the balance of power theory is relevant to explain why Vietnam attempts to strengthen strategic alliances with the USA, Russia, EU, and India to balance against the rising threat of China in SCS. However, this theory is not able to explain why Vietnam has a bandwagoning policy toward China at the same time. To fill the gap of the previous studies, this study endeavors to put forward the point that as geopolitical rivalry between the two superpowers, the United States and China, intensifies, Vietnam is put in a predicament of balancing the economic and the political choices against the choices of taking a neutral stand against the assertiveness of China in the SCS. Further, the alternative traditional balance options with ASEAN, and Russia are not sufficiently effective for Vietnam to balance against China since the position of both ASEAN and Russia is much weaker than China. This study also suggests that the support of the USA, EU, and its alliance for Vietnam’s position creates unbearable costs for China’s aggressive behaviors in SCS. By using the mathematical and logical framework, the study suggests that Vietnam tends to adopt a mixed strategy (balancing, bandwagoning, neutrality) in dealing with China’s threats.","PeriodicalId":505792,"journal":{"name":"Heritage and Sustainable Development","volume":"32 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US-China global competition and dilemma for Vietnam's strategic choices in the South China Sea conflict\",\"authors\":\"Nguyen Manh Cuong, Kaddour Chelabi, Safia Anjum, Navya Gubbi Sateeshchandra, Svitlana Samoylenko, Kangwa Silwizya, Tran Nghiem\",\"doi\":\"10.37868/hsd.v6i1.550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The South China Sea (SCS) conflict has become a critical factor for regional peace and development with growing geopolitical competition between China and the USA. To face the rising threat of China, the study argues that the balance of power theory is relevant to explain why Vietnam attempts to strengthen strategic alliances with the USA, Russia, EU, and India to balance against the rising threat of China in SCS. However, this theory is not able to explain why Vietnam has a bandwagoning policy toward China at the same time. To fill the gap of the previous studies, this study endeavors to put forward the point that as geopolitical rivalry between the two superpowers, the United States and China, intensifies, Vietnam is put in a predicament of balancing the economic and the political choices against the choices of taking a neutral stand against the assertiveness of China in the SCS. Further, the alternative traditional balance options with ASEAN, and Russia are not sufficiently effective for Vietnam to balance against China since the position of both ASEAN and Russia is much weaker than China. This study also suggests that the support of the USA, EU, and its alliance for Vietnam’s position creates unbearable costs for China’s aggressive behaviors in SCS. By using the mathematical and logical framework, the study suggests that Vietnam tends to adopt a mixed strategy (balancing, bandwagoning, neutrality) in dealing with China’s threats.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heritage and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"32 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heritage and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v6i1.550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v6i1.550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着中美地缘政治竞争的日益加剧,南海冲突已成为地区和平与发展的关键因素。面对中国不断上升的威胁,本研究认为,均势理论可以解释越南为何试图加强与美国、俄罗斯、欧盟和印度的战略联盟,以平衡中国在南中国海不断上升的威胁。然而,这一理论无法解释越南为何同时对中国采取拉拢政策。为了弥补以往研究的不足,本研究试图提出这样一个观点:随着中美两个超级大国之间地缘政治竞争的加剧,越南陷入了在经济和政治选择与针对中国在南沙群岛的强硬态度采取中立立场的选择之间寻求平衡的困境。此外,由于东盟和俄罗斯的立场远弱于中国,越南与东盟和俄罗斯的传统平衡选择不足以有效平衡中国。本研究还表明,美国、欧盟及其联盟对越南立场的支持为中国在南沙的侵略行为带来了难以承受的代价。通过使用数学逻辑框架,本研究认为越南在应对中国威胁时倾向于采取混合战略(平衡、拉帮结派、中立)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
US-China global competition and dilemma for Vietnam's strategic choices in the South China Sea conflict
The South China Sea (SCS) conflict has become a critical factor for regional peace and development with growing geopolitical competition between China and the USA. To face the rising threat of China, the study argues that the balance of power theory is relevant to explain why Vietnam attempts to strengthen strategic alliances with the USA, Russia, EU, and India to balance against the rising threat of China in SCS. However, this theory is not able to explain why Vietnam has a bandwagoning policy toward China at the same time. To fill the gap of the previous studies, this study endeavors to put forward the point that as geopolitical rivalry between the two superpowers, the United States and China, intensifies, Vietnam is put in a predicament of balancing the economic and the political choices against the choices of taking a neutral stand against the assertiveness of China in the SCS. Further, the alternative traditional balance options with ASEAN, and Russia are not sufficiently effective for Vietnam to balance against China since the position of both ASEAN and Russia is much weaker than China. This study also suggests that the support of the USA, EU, and its alliance for Vietnam’s position creates unbearable costs for China’s aggressive behaviors in SCS. By using the mathematical and logical framework, the study suggests that Vietnam tends to adopt a mixed strategy (balancing, bandwagoning, neutrality) in dealing with China’s threats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial equilibrium: An in-depth look at working capital management and productivity in manufacturing SMEs in Ecuador The impact of financial leverage on accrual-based and real earnings management considering role of growth opportunities Governance and subjective well-being in the Countries of the Andean Community (CAN) Impact assessment methods for teaching activities on sustainable development goals in higher education institutions: A case study from a Bosnian university River morphological behavior between two barrages on the Euphrates: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1