拉丁美洲呼吸系统保健专业人员的循证实践:

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Colombia Medica Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.25100/cm.v55i1.5884
Vicente Benavides, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Guilherme A.F. Fregonezi, Vanessa Resqueti, Orlando Perez Nieto, Alejandra Cañas, Santiago Larrateguy, Guillermo Mazzucco, Jhonatan Betancourt-Peña
{"title":"拉丁美洲呼吸系统保健专业人员的循证实践:","authors":"Vicente Benavides, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Guilherme A.F. Fregonezi, Vanessa Resqueti, Orlando Perez Nieto, Alejandra Cañas, Santiago Larrateguy, Guillermo Mazzucco, Jhonatan Betancourt-Peña","doi":"10.25100/cm.v55i1.5884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach to professional practice using the best available evidence to make informed clinical decisions in healthcare. It is necessary to measure and identify strengths and opportunities for improvement.\nObjective: To assess the knowledge and application of EBP in respiratory health professionals in Latin America.\nMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The questionnaire was distributed online to health professionals in Latin American countries. Demographic data, professional characteristics, EBP training, and questionnaire responses were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed.\nResults: A total of 448 respiratory health professionals participated in the study. Responses were obtained from 17 countries where the majority were female, with an average age of 42. Participants included physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, respiratory therapists, speech therapists, and occupational therapists. Overall scores indicated moderate to high levels of EBP knowledge and application. However, variations were observed in different dimensions. Factors such as EBP training, reading scientific articles, and professional characteristics were associated with higher scores. Barriers to implementing EBP were identified mostly related to institutional support.\n Conclusions: This study provides information on the knowledge and implementation of EBP in respiratory health professionals in Latin America. Although the overall levels of knowledge and application of EBP were moderate to high, there are options for improvement, especially in addressing barriers to implementation.","PeriodicalId":50667,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based practice in respiratory healthcare professionals in Latin America:\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Benavides, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Guilherme A.F. Fregonezi, Vanessa Resqueti, Orlando Perez Nieto, Alejandra Cañas, Santiago Larrateguy, Guillermo Mazzucco, Jhonatan Betancourt-Peña\",\"doi\":\"10.25100/cm.v55i1.5884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach to professional practice using the best available evidence to make informed clinical decisions in healthcare. It is necessary to measure and identify strengths and opportunities for improvement.\\nObjective: To assess the knowledge and application of EBP in respiratory health professionals in Latin America.\\nMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The questionnaire was distributed online to health professionals in Latin American countries. Demographic data, professional characteristics, EBP training, and questionnaire responses were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed.\\nResults: A total of 448 respiratory health professionals participated in the study. Responses were obtained from 17 countries where the majority were female, with an average age of 42. Participants included physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, respiratory therapists, speech therapists, and occupational therapists. Overall scores indicated moderate to high levels of EBP knowledge and application. However, variations were observed in different dimensions. Factors such as EBP training, reading scientific articles, and professional characteristics were associated with higher scores. Barriers to implementing EBP were identified mostly related to institutional support.\\n Conclusions: This study provides information on the knowledge and implementation of EBP in respiratory health professionals in Latin America. Although the overall levels of knowledge and application of EBP were moderate to high, there are options for improvement, especially in addressing barriers to implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colombia Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colombia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v55i1.5884\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v55i1.5884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:循证实践(EBP)是一种系统的专业实践方法,利用现有的最佳证据在医疗保健领域做出明智的临床决策。有必要对其进行衡量,并确定其优势和改进机会:评估拉丁美洲呼吸系统保健专业人员对 EBP 的了解和应用情况:方法:进行横断面研究。调查问卷通过网络发放给拉丁美洲国家的医疗卫生专业人员。收集了人口统计学数据、专业特点、EBP 培训和问卷答复。研究进行了描述性和推论性统计分析:共有 448 名呼吸系统卫生专业人员参与了研究。调查对象来自 17 个国家,大多数为女性,平均年龄为 42 岁。参与者包括医生、物理治疗师、护士、呼吸治疗师、语言治疗师和职业治疗师。总体得分表明,EBP 的知识和应用达到了中等至高等水平。然而,在不同的维度上也观察到了差异。EBP 培训、阅读科学文章和专业特点等因素与较高的得分有关。实施 EBP 的障碍主要与机构支持有关。结论:本研究提供了拉丁美洲呼吸健康专业人员对 EBP 的了解和实施情况。虽然 EBP 的总体知识水平和应用水平处于中等偏上水平,但仍有改进的余地,尤其是在解决实施障碍方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based practice in respiratory healthcare professionals in Latin America:
Background:Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach to professional practice using the best available evidence to make informed clinical decisions in healthcare. It is necessary to measure and identify strengths and opportunities for improvement. Objective: To assess the knowledge and application of EBP in respiratory health professionals in Latin America. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The questionnaire was distributed online to health professionals in Latin American countries. Demographic data, professional characteristics, EBP training, and questionnaire responses were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed. Results: A total of 448 respiratory health professionals participated in the study. Responses were obtained from 17 countries where the majority were female, with an average age of 42. Participants included physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, respiratory therapists, speech therapists, and occupational therapists. Overall scores indicated moderate to high levels of EBP knowledge and application. However, variations were observed in different dimensions. Factors such as EBP training, reading scientific articles, and professional characteristics were associated with higher scores. Barriers to implementing EBP were identified mostly related to institutional support. Conclusions: This study provides information on the knowledge and implementation of EBP in respiratory health professionals in Latin America. Although the overall levels of knowledge and application of EBP were moderate to high, there are options for improvement, especially in addressing barriers to implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colombia Medica
Colombia Medica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Colombia Médica is an international peer-reviewed medical journal that will consider any original contribution that advances or illuminates medical science or practice, or that educates to the journal''s’ readers.The journal is owned by a non-profit organization, Universidad del Valle, and serves the scientific community strictly following the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) recommendations of policies on publication ethics policies for medical journals. Colombia Médica publishes original research articles, viewpoints and reviews in all areas of medical science and clinical practice. However, Colombia Médica gives the highest priority to papers on general and internal medicine, public health and primary health care.
期刊最新文献
El hilo de Ariadna en la era de la inteligencia artificial: paralelismos entre el mito griego y las recomendaciones de WAME Evidence-based practice in respiratory healthcare professionals in Latin America: Content quality and reliability of the YouTube videos about chronic prostatitis Effects of central intermittent theta-burst stimulation combined with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb function in stroke patients. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: What are the ethical boundaries? - A Reflection inspired by the myth of Prometheus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1