在内科诊所获得围产期护理:障碍、干预措施和种族差异

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetric Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1177/1753495x241255812
Kanika Malani, Sarah Arbaugh, Courtney Bilodeau
{"title":"在内科诊所获得围产期护理:障碍、干预措施和种族差异","authors":"Kanika Malani, Sarah Arbaugh, Courtney Bilodeau","doi":"10.1177/1753495x241255812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates obstacles peripartum patients with additional medical needs face and services that would be helpful in obtaining this care. A survey was administered to 226 patients at a clinic specializing in internal medicine care for peripartum patients. Data was analyzed through descriptive statistics and linear regression. The three most reported barriers that interfered with attending medical appointments included the inability to leave work (41%), being too busy (33%), and lack of childcare (29%). Hispanic and Black patients reported more barriers to care as compared to White patients. The three most reported interventions that would be helpful in attending appointments were more virtual appointment options (38%), increased insurance coverage (31%), and provision of childcare (30%). Interventions were widely rated as helpful regardless of barriers faced and race reported. Targeted interventions are needed to enhance access to peripartum care, especially for patients from marginalized racial and ethnic populations.","PeriodicalId":51717,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessing peripartum care in an internal medicine clinic: Barriers, interventions, and racial disparities\",\"authors\":\"Kanika Malani, Sarah Arbaugh, Courtney Bilodeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1753495x241255812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study evaluates obstacles peripartum patients with additional medical needs face and services that would be helpful in obtaining this care. A survey was administered to 226 patients at a clinic specializing in internal medicine care for peripartum patients. Data was analyzed through descriptive statistics and linear regression. The three most reported barriers that interfered with attending medical appointments included the inability to leave work (41%), being too busy (33%), and lack of childcare (29%). Hispanic and Black patients reported more barriers to care as compared to White patients. The three most reported interventions that would be helpful in attending appointments were more virtual appointment options (38%), increased insurance coverage (31%), and provision of childcare (30%). Interventions were widely rated as helpful regardless of barriers faced and race reported. Targeted interventions are needed to enhance access to peripartum care, especially for patients from marginalized racial and ethnic populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetric Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495x241255812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495x241255812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了有额外医疗需求的围产期病人所面临的障碍,以及有助于获得这种护理的服务。我们在一家专门为围产期患者提供内科护理的诊所对 226 名患者进行了调查。通过描述性统计和线性回归对数据进行了分析。据报告,影响就诊的三大障碍包括:无法离开工作岗位(41%)、太忙(33%)和缺乏托儿服务(29%)。与白人患者相比,西班牙裔和黑人患者报告的就医障碍更多。报告最多的三种有助于就诊的干预措施是:更多的虚拟就诊选择(38%)、增加保险覆盖面(31%)和提供托儿服务(30%)。无论所面临的障碍和报告的种族如何,干预措施都被广泛认为是有帮助的。需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以提高围产期护理的可及性,尤其是对来自边缘化种族和民族的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accessing peripartum care in an internal medicine clinic: Barriers, interventions, and racial disparities
This study evaluates obstacles peripartum patients with additional medical needs face and services that would be helpful in obtaining this care. A survey was administered to 226 patients at a clinic specializing in internal medicine care for peripartum patients. Data was analyzed through descriptive statistics and linear regression. The three most reported barriers that interfered with attending medical appointments included the inability to leave work (41%), being too busy (33%), and lack of childcare (29%). Hispanic and Black patients reported more barriers to care as compared to White patients. The three most reported interventions that would be helpful in attending appointments were more virtual appointment options (38%), increased insurance coverage (31%), and provision of childcare (30%). Interventions were widely rated as helpful regardless of barriers faced and race reported. Targeted interventions are needed to enhance access to peripartum care, especially for patients from marginalized racial and ethnic populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetric Medicine
Obstetric Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Extracellular vesicles: A potential new way to assess cholestasis. Hanns-Ulrich Marschall (15.2.1954-1.8.2023). ICP: A midwifery perspective. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Introduction and overview 2024. Measuring bile acids: Are we all talking the same language?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1