溶剂类型和叶片水分对甜叶菊(变种 Levent 93)植物中主要甜菊醇苷提取效率的影响

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Acta Alimentaria Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1556/066.2023.00245
U.T. Zoua Assoumou, H. R. Öziyci, A. Hacıoğlu, M. Karhan
{"title":"溶剂类型和叶片水分对甜叶菊(变种 Levent 93)植物中主要甜菊醇苷提取效率的影响","authors":"U.T. Zoua Assoumou, H. R. Öziyci, A. Hacıoğlu, M. Karhan","doi":"10.1556/066.2023.00245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Steviol glycosides (SGs) are natural sweeteners derived from stevia leaves, which have various applications in food and beverage products. The extraction efficiency of SGs depends on several factors, such as solvent type, solid to solvent ratio, centrifugal force, and temperature. This study aimed to compare the effects of different solvents (ethanol and water) and leaf moisture (dry and fresh) on the extraction efficiency of major steviol glycosides (SGs) of rebaudioside A (Reb A), stevioside (ST), and rebaudioside C (Reb C) in stevia (var. Levent 93) plant. A Box–Behnken design was used to optimise the extraction parameters for each extraction type. The results showed that ethanol was a more effective solvent than water, however, aqueous extraction was more environmentally friendly and low-cost, and could also yield high concentrations of SGs when fresh leaves were used. The major SGs had similar concentrations in ethanolic extraction, but Reb A was twice as high as ST in aqueous extraction. Reb C was influenced by the solid to solvent ratio in both extraction types, but more so in water extraction. Temperature had a positive effect on ST and Reb C in water extraction of fresh leaves, but not in water extraction of dry leaves or ethanolic extraction. The results of this study contribute to the optimisation of SGs extraction from stevia leaves and provide insights for future research on the effects of different solvents and extraction parameters on the quality and purity of SGs.","PeriodicalId":6908,"journal":{"name":"Acta Alimentaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of solvent type and leaf moisture on extraction efficiency of major steviol glycosides in stevia (var. Levent 93) plant\",\"authors\":\"U.T. Zoua Assoumou, H. R. Öziyci, A. Hacıoğlu, M. Karhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/066.2023.00245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Steviol glycosides (SGs) are natural sweeteners derived from stevia leaves, which have various applications in food and beverage products. The extraction efficiency of SGs depends on several factors, such as solvent type, solid to solvent ratio, centrifugal force, and temperature. This study aimed to compare the effects of different solvents (ethanol and water) and leaf moisture (dry and fresh) on the extraction efficiency of major steviol glycosides (SGs) of rebaudioside A (Reb A), stevioside (ST), and rebaudioside C (Reb C) in stevia (var. Levent 93) plant. A Box–Behnken design was used to optimise the extraction parameters for each extraction type. The results showed that ethanol was a more effective solvent than water, however, aqueous extraction was more environmentally friendly and low-cost, and could also yield high concentrations of SGs when fresh leaves were used. The major SGs had similar concentrations in ethanolic extraction, but Reb A was twice as high as ST in aqueous extraction. Reb C was influenced by the solid to solvent ratio in both extraction types, but more so in water extraction. Temperature had a positive effect on ST and Reb C in water extraction of fresh leaves, but not in water extraction of dry leaves or ethanolic extraction. The results of this study contribute to the optimisation of SGs extraction from stevia leaves and provide insights for future research on the effects of different solvents and extraction parameters on the quality and purity of SGs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Alimentaria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Alimentaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/066.2023.00245\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Alimentaria","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/066.2023.00245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甜菊醇糖苷(SGs)是从甜叶菊叶中提取的天然甜味剂,在食品和饮料产品中有多种应用。甜菊醇苷的提取效率取决于多种因素,如溶剂类型、固体与溶剂比率、离心力和温度。本研究旨在比较不同溶剂(乙醇和水)和叶片水分(干燥和新鲜)对甜叶菊(变种 Levent 93)中主要甜菊糖苷(SGs)的提取效率的影响。采用方框-贝肯设计法对每种萃取类型的萃取参数进行了优化。结果表明,乙醇是一种比水更有效的溶剂,但水萃取更环保、成本更低,而且在使用鲜叶时也能获得高浓度的 SGs。乙醇萃取中主要 SG 的浓度相似,但水萃取中 Reb A 的浓度是 ST 的两倍。Reb C 在两种萃取类型中都受到固体与溶剂比例的影响,但在水提取中影响更大。在鲜叶水提取中,温度对 ST 和 Reb C 有积极影响,但在干叶水提取或乙醇提取中则没有。这项研究的结果有助于优化甜叶菊叶中 SGs 的提取,并为今后研究不同溶剂和提取参数对 SGs 质量和纯度的影响提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of solvent type and leaf moisture on extraction efficiency of major steviol glycosides in stevia (var. Levent 93) plant
Steviol glycosides (SGs) are natural sweeteners derived from stevia leaves, which have various applications in food and beverage products. The extraction efficiency of SGs depends on several factors, such as solvent type, solid to solvent ratio, centrifugal force, and temperature. This study aimed to compare the effects of different solvents (ethanol and water) and leaf moisture (dry and fresh) on the extraction efficiency of major steviol glycosides (SGs) of rebaudioside A (Reb A), stevioside (ST), and rebaudioside C (Reb C) in stevia (var. Levent 93) plant. A Box–Behnken design was used to optimise the extraction parameters for each extraction type. The results showed that ethanol was a more effective solvent than water, however, aqueous extraction was more environmentally friendly and low-cost, and could also yield high concentrations of SGs when fresh leaves were used. The major SGs had similar concentrations in ethanolic extraction, but Reb A was twice as high as ST in aqueous extraction. Reb C was influenced by the solid to solvent ratio in both extraction types, but more so in water extraction. Temperature had a positive effect on ST and Reb C in water extraction of fresh leaves, but not in water extraction of dry leaves or ethanolic extraction. The results of this study contribute to the optimisation of SGs extraction from stevia leaves and provide insights for future research on the effects of different solvents and extraction parameters on the quality and purity of SGs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Alimentaria
Acta Alimentaria 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Alimentaria publishes original papers and reviews on food science (physics, physical chemistry, chemistry, analysis, biology, microbiology, enzymology, engineering, instrumentation, automation and economics of foods, food production and food technology, food quality, post-harvest treatments, food safety and nutrition).
期刊最新文献
Enrichment of apple juice with antioxidant-rich elderberry (Sambucus nigra L) pomace extract Antihyperlipidemic activity of myricetin Mechanochemical depolymerisation, chemical structure, and in vitro prebiotic potential of glucans derived from microcrystalline cellulose Stress modulation strategies in Kluyveromyces marxianus: Unravelling the effects of shear force and aeration for enhanced specific ergosterol production Influence of preharvest fungicides on decay incidence and fruit quality of mango fruits during storage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1