在中低收入国家开展有关行星健康和可持续医疗保健的教育:开普敦大学健康科学学院 "行星健康成绩单 "认知评估

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Education for Health Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.62694/efh.2024.17
J. Irlam, Steve Reid, H-A Rother
{"title":"在中低收入国家开展有关行星健康和可持续医疗保健的教育:开普敦大学健康科学学院 \"行星健康成绩单 \"认知评估","authors":"J. Irlam, Steve Reid, H-A Rother","doi":"10.62694/efh.2024.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The Planetary Health Report Card (PHRC) was developed by medical students in the USA as a metric-based scorecard and institutional advocacy tool for planetary health (PH), with respect to five categories: Curriculum, Community Engagement, Student Leadership, Research, and Campus Sustainability. The PHRC has expanded into a global initiative, although its use by faculties in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been very limited. Objectives. To assess perceptions at the Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) of the University of Cape Town (UCT) about PH and sustainable healthcare (SH); and perceptions of the barriers and opportunities for integrating PH and SH into curricula in the UCT FHS. Methods. A PHRC was completed for the UCT FHS by means of interviews with key educators. Interview summaries, and scored report cards (where applicable), were shared for validity checking before compilation of the UCT FHS summary report. Results. Thirty-nine interviews were conducted, 31 of them with key educators representing nine academic departments. Twenty- three graded report cards were completed with those engaged in PH and SH activities. The PHRC category scores ranged from a grade of D minus (20%) for Student Leadership to a C grade for Curriculum (54%), with an overall grade of C minus (42%). Education about PH and SH in the UCT FHS is seen as increasingly important yet insufficient. Curriculum overload, “siloed” learning, and poor understanding among educators were perceived as key barriers. PH and SH were proposed as cross- cutting curricular themes for all health sciences disciplines in the UCT FHS. More community engagement, student leadership development, collaborative research, and campus sustainability interventions were recommended in the other PHRC categories. Conclusion. The PHRC provides a baseline assessment of PH and SH in a faculty of health sciences in a LMIC contributing towards greater environmental accountability. It should be repeated regularly at the UCT FHS to measure and evaluate progress in integrating PH and SH into transformed curricula, engagement with the communities it serves, development of student leadership, in ch, and campus sustainability.","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education about Planetary Health and Sustainable Healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: Planetary Health Report Card assessment of perceptions at University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences\",\"authors\":\"J. Irlam, Steve Reid, H-A Rother\",\"doi\":\"10.62694/efh.2024.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The Planetary Health Report Card (PHRC) was developed by medical students in the USA as a metric-based scorecard and institutional advocacy tool for planetary health (PH), with respect to five categories: Curriculum, Community Engagement, Student Leadership, Research, and Campus Sustainability. The PHRC has expanded into a global initiative, although its use by faculties in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been very limited. Objectives. To assess perceptions at the Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) of the University of Cape Town (UCT) about PH and sustainable healthcare (SH); and perceptions of the barriers and opportunities for integrating PH and SH into curricula in the UCT FHS. Methods. A PHRC was completed for the UCT FHS by means of interviews with key educators. Interview summaries, and scored report cards (where applicable), were shared for validity checking before compilation of the UCT FHS summary report. Results. Thirty-nine interviews were conducted, 31 of them with key educators representing nine academic departments. Twenty- three graded report cards were completed with those engaged in PH and SH activities. The PHRC category scores ranged from a grade of D minus (20%) for Student Leadership to a C grade for Curriculum (54%), with an overall grade of C minus (42%). Education about PH and SH in the UCT FHS is seen as increasingly important yet insufficient. Curriculum overload, “siloed” learning, and poor understanding among educators were perceived as key barriers. PH and SH were proposed as cross- cutting curricular themes for all health sciences disciplines in the UCT FHS. More community engagement, student leadership development, collaborative research, and campus sustainability interventions were recommended in the other PHRC categories. Conclusion. The PHRC provides a baseline assessment of PH and SH in a faculty of health sciences in a LMIC contributing towards greater environmental accountability. It should be repeated regularly at the UCT FHS to measure and evaluate progress in integrating PH and SH into transformed curricula, engagement with the communities it serves, development of student leadership, in ch, and campus sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62694/efh.2024.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62694/efh.2024.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。行星健康成绩单(PHRC)是由美国医科学生开发的,作为行星健康(PH)的一个基于度量的记分卡和机构宣传工具,涉及五个类别:课程、社区参与、学生领导力、研究和校园可持续性。尽管中低收入国家(LMICs)的院系对 PHRC 的使用非常有限,但 PHRC 已扩展为一项全球倡议。目标。评估开普敦大学(UCT)健康科学学院(FHS)对 PH 和可持续医疗保健(SH)的看法;以及对将 PH 和 SH 纳入开普敦大学健康科学学院课程的障碍和机遇的看法。方法。通过对主要教育工作者进行访谈,完成了一项针对 UCT 家庭保健服务的 PHRC。访谈摘要和评分报告卡(如适用)在编制 UCT 家庭健康服务总结报告之前进行了有效性检查。结果。共进行了 39 次访谈,其中 31 次是与代表九个学术部门的主要教育工作者进行的。参与 PH 和 SH 活动的人员填写了 23 份评分报告单。PHRC类别的得分从学生领导力的D减分(20%)到课程的C级(54%)不等,总成绩为C减分(42%)。在 UCT FHS 中,有关 PH 和 SH 的教育被认为越来越重要,但却不够充分。课程负担过重、"各自为政 "的学习以及教育工作者对其理解不足被认为是主要障碍。建议将 PH 和 SH 作为 UCT FHS 所有健康科学学科的交叉课程主题。在 PHRC 的其他类别中,建议采取更多的社区参与、学生领导力培养、合作研究和校园可持续发展干预措施。结论PHRC提供了对低收入和中等收入国家健康科学学院PH和SH的基线评估,有助于加强环境责任。应定期在 UCT 健康科学学院重复进行该评估,以衡量和评价在将 PH 和 SH 纳入转型课程、与所服务的社区合作、发展学生领导力、合作和校园可持续发展方面取得的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Education about Planetary Health and Sustainable Healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: Planetary Health Report Card assessment of perceptions at University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences
Background. The Planetary Health Report Card (PHRC) was developed by medical students in the USA as a metric-based scorecard and institutional advocacy tool for planetary health (PH), with respect to five categories: Curriculum, Community Engagement, Student Leadership, Research, and Campus Sustainability. The PHRC has expanded into a global initiative, although its use by faculties in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been very limited. Objectives. To assess perceptions at the Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) of the University of Cape Town (UCT) about PH and sustainable healthcare (SH); and perceptions of the barriers and opportunities for integrating PH and SH into curricula in the UCT FHS. Methods. A PHRC was completed for the UCT FHS by means of interviews with key educators. Interview summaries, and scored report cards (where applicable), were shared for validity checking before compilation of the UCT FHS summary report. Results. Thirty-nine interviews were conducted, 31 of them with key educators representing nine academic departments. Twenty- three graded report cards were completed with those engaged in PH and SH activities. The PHRC category scores ranged from a grade of D minus (20%) for Student Leadership to a C grade for Curriculum (54%), with an overall grade of C minus (42%). Education about PH and SH in the UCT FHS is seen as increasingly important yet insufficient. Curriculum overload, “siloed” learning, and poor understanding among educators were perceived as key barriers. PH and SH were proposed as cross- cutting curricular themes for all health sciences disciplines in the UCT FHS. More community engagement, student leadership development, collaborative research, and campus sustainability interventions were recommended in the other PHRC categories. Conclusion. The PHRC provides a baseline assessment of PH and SH in a faculty of health sciences in a LMIC contributing towards greater environmental accountability. It should be repeated regularly at the UCT FHS to measure and evaluate progress in integrating PH and SH into transformed curricula, engagement with the communities it serves, development of student leadership, in ch, and campus sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
期刊最新文献
The Way Forward for Integrated Health Sciences Degree Programs Education about Planetary Health and Sustainable Healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: Planetary Health Report Card assessment of perceptions at University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Lessons learned in development of vision and mission statements How do Educational Staff and Students in a Medical School Perceive Social Accountability? A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Interview Study Thank you, Michael Glasser!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1