观察者极化双意识的粒子纠缠--作为证明的修改版斯特恩-格拉赫实验

Qeios Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.32388/0eqotj.7
A. Pletcher
{"title":"观察者极化双意识的粒子纠缠--作为证明的修改版斯特恩-格拉赫实验","authors":"A. Pletcher","doi":"10.32388/0eqotj.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Theoretical proposition of particle entanglement with the polarized dual Consciousness of a single observer (and subsequent local and remote environments) during Quantum Decoherence, explains the Two-State System experiments, and is SUPPORTED BY MATHEMATICAL CONJECTURE, using a Classic Space analogue to Quantum Decoherence: Recursive information exchange (RIE), within the framework of reinforcement loops, between agents. From this dynamic system of information exchange, the resulting decreased Shannon entropy, increased potential energy, polarization and preferential growth (over scales) are compared with Von Neuman entropy during Quantum Entanglement and collapse. The observational components of RIE (biased observation, interpretation, response and self-validation) are analyzed and shown to be SUBJECTIVELY VALIDATED. This corollary of \"self-validated observation\" explains the logical inconsistencies in the Two States Experiments. A SIMPLE MODIFIED STERN GERLACH EXPERIMENTAL IS PROPOSED AS A PROOF.\n","PeriodicalId":503632,"journal":{"name":"Qeios","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Particle Entanglement With the Observer’s Polarized Dual Consciousness — A Modified Stern Gerlach Experiment, as Proof\",\"authors\":\"A. Pletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.32388/0eqotj.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Theoretical proposition of particle entanglement with the polarized dual Consciousness of a single observer (and subsequent local and remote environments) during Quantum Decoherence, explains the Two-State System experiments, and is SUPPORTED BY MATHEMATICAL CONJECTURE, using a Classic Space analogue to Quantum Decoherence: Recursive information exchange (RIE), within the framework of reinforcement loops, between agents. From this dynamic system of information exchange, the resulting decreased Shannon entropy, increased potential energy, polarization and preferential growth (over scales) are compared with Von Neuman entropy during Quantum Entanglement and collapse. The observational components of RIE (biased observation, interpretation, response and self-validation) are analyzed and shown to be SUBJECTIVELY VALIDATED. This corollary of \\\"self-validated observation\\\" explains the logical inconsistencies in the Two States Experiments. A SIMPLE MODIFIED STERN GERLACH EXPERIMENTAL IS PROPOSED AS A PROOF.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qeios\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qeios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32388/0eqotj.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qeios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32388/0eqotj.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在量子退相干过程中,粒子与单个观察者(以及随后的本地和远程环境)的极化双重意识纠缠的理论命题,解释了双态系统实验,并得到数学推论的支持,使用经典空间模拟量子退相干:在强化循环的框架内,代理之间进行递归信息交换(RIE)。从这一动态信息交换系统中,所产生的香农熵下降、势能增加、极化和优先增长(超尺度)与量子纠缠和坍缩过程中的冯-纽曼熵进行了比较。对 RIE 的观察成分(偏差观察、解释、反应和自我验证)进行了分析,结果表明它们都是经过客观验证的。这种 "自我验证观察 "的推论解释了两国实验中的逻辑矛盾。提出了一个简单的修正斯特恩-格拉赫实验作为证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Particle Entanglement With the Observer’s Polarized Dual Consciousness — A Modified Stern Gerlach Experiment, as Proof
A Theoretical proposition of particle entanglement with the polarized dual Consciousness of a single observer (and subsequent local and remote environments) during Quantum Decoherence, explains the Two-State System experiments, and is SUPPORTED BY MATHEMATICAL CONJECTURE, using a Classic Space analogue to Quantum Decoherence: Recursive information exchange (RIE), within the framework of reinforcement loops, between agents. From this dynamic system of information exchange, the resulting decreased Shannon entropy, increased potential energy, polarization and preferential growth (over scales) are compared with Von Neuman entropy during Quantum Entanglement and collapse. The observational components of RIE (biased observation, interpretation, response and self-validation) are analyzed and shown to be SUBJECTIVELY VALIDATED. This corollary of "self-validated observation" explains the logical inconsistencies in the Two States Experiments. A SIMPLE MODIFIED STERN GERLACH EXPERIMENTAL IS PROPOSED AS A PROOF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of: "Since nano antennas have the ability to absorb a wide angle, even in in the case of oblique solar radiation to the surface of the solar panel" Review of: "nanodipole L/d is significantly reduced, it cannot be used" Review of: "Nano network is a communication network at nano scale between nano devices" [Commentary] India’s steps towards carbon dioxide monitoring in public assembly spaces for ventilation measurement for airborne infection control and other factors Use of Digital Platforms Among University Students: A Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1