以数据预处理为重点的文本分类机器学习和深度学习技术比较分析

Qeios Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.32388/xhc9j1
Dr.Saikat Gochhait
{"title":"以数据预处理为重点的文本分类机器学习和深度学习技术比较分析","authors":"Dr.Saikat Gochhait","doi":"10.32388/xhc9j1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physician-written discharge medical notes include vital details regarding their patients' health. Numerous deep learning algorithms have shown effective in gleaning crucial insights from unstructured medical notes data, leading to potentially useful outcomes in the medical field. The goal of this research is to determine how different deep learning algorithms perform as models for text classification issues in long short term memory (LSTM).\n\nTitanic Disaster Dataset has been used for pre-processing is essential since there is a lot of unnecessary information in textual data. Next, clean up the data by eliminating duplicate rows and filling in the blanks. Besides traditional machine learning algorithms such as naive bayes (NB), gradient boosting (GB), and support vector machine (SVM), we use deep learning algorithms to classify data, including bidirectional – LSTM using Conditional Random Fields (CRFs). BiLSTM is the most precise model compared to other models and baseline research, with a classification accuracy of 98.5%.\n","PeriodicalId":503632,"journal":{"name":"Qeios","volume":"64 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques for Text Classification with Emphasis on Data Preprocessing\",\"authors\":\"Dr.Saikat Gochhait\",\"doi\":\"10.32388/xhc9j1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physician-written discharge medical notes include vital details regarding their patients' health. Numerous deep learning algorithms have shown effective in gleaning crucial insights from unstructured medical notes data, leading to potentially useful outcomes in the medical field. The goal of this research is to determine how different deep learning algorithms perform as models for text classification issues in long short term memory (LSTM).\\n\\nTitanic Disaster Dataset has been used for pre-processing is essential since there is a lot of unnecessary information in textual data. Next, clean up the data by eliminating duplicate rows and filling in the blanks. Besides traditional machine learning algorithms such as naive bayes (NB), gradient boosting (GB), and support vector machine (SVM), we use deep learning algorithms to classify data, including bidirectional – LSTM using Conditional Random Fields (CRFs). BiLSTM is the most precise model compared to other models and baseline research, with a classification accuracy of 98.5%.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qeios\",\"volume\":\"64 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qeios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32388/xhc9j1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qeios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32388/xhc9j1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生撰写的出院医疗记录包含有关病人健康的重要细节。许多深度学习算法都能有效地从非结构化医疗笔记数据中收集关键信息,从而在医疗领域取得潜在的有用成果。这项研究的目标是确定不同的深度学习算法作为长短期记忆(LSTM)中文本分类问题的模型表现如何。泰坦尼克号灾难数据集已被用于预处理,这一点至关重要,因为文本数据中有大量不必要的信息。接下来,通过消除重复行和填补空白来清理数据。除了天真贝叶斯(NB)、梯度提升(GB)和支持向量机(SVM)等传统机器学习算法外,我们还使用深度学习算法对数据进行分类,包括使用条件随机场(CRF)的双向 LSTM。与其他模型和基线研究相比,BiLSTM 是最精确的模型,分类准确率高达 98.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques for Text Classification with Emphasis on Data Preprocessing
Physician-written discharge medical notes include vital details regarding their patients' health. Numerous deep learning algorithms have shown effective in gleaning crucial insights from unstructured medical notes data, leading to potentially useful outcomes in the medical field. The goal of this research is to determine how different deep learning algorithms perform as models for text classification issues in long short term memory (LSTM). Titanic Disaster Dataset has been used for pre-processing is essential since there is a lot of unnecessary information in textual data. Next, clean up the data by eliminating duplicate rows and filling in the blanks. Besides traditional machine learning algorithms such as naive bayes (NB), gradient boosting (GB), and support vector machine (SVM), we use deep learning algorithms to classify data, including bidirectional – LSTM using Conditional Random Fields (CRFs). BiLSTM is the most precise model compared to other models and baseline research, with a classification accuracy of 98.5%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of: "Since nano antennas have the ability to absorb a wide angle, even in in the case of oblique solar radiation to the surface of the solar panel" Review of: "nanodipole L/d is significantly reduced, it cannot be used" Review of: "Nano network is a communication network at nano scale between nano devices" [Commentary] India’s steps towards carbon dioxide monitoring in public assembly spaces for ventilation measurement for airborne infection control and other factors Use of Digital Platforms Among University Students: A Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1