Linda C. Qu, A. Istl, Elaine Tang, Richard C. Chaulk, Daryl Gray
{"title":"加拿大嗜铬细胞瘤围手术期管理的差异","authors":"Linda C. Qu, A. Istl, Elaine Tang, Richard C. Chaulk, Daryl Gray","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite recent consensus guidelines, there is substantial variability in the management of pheochromocytomas. Our study aimed to characterize the current state of perioperative pheochromocytoma management by Canadian surgeons.\nMethods: A 23-item online survey was sent to Canadian surgeons who perform adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma. We assessed personal and institutional practices, including preoperative and postoperative management.\nResults: National response rate was 51.8%. Surgeons from nine provinces responded; the majority were general surgeons (70.4%). Reviewing pheochromocytoma patients at a multidisciplinary tumor board was not routine practice (12%) and only 42.3% consistently referred patients for genetic testing. Preoperative α- and β-blockade at half of the respondent institutions were performed by endocrinology alone (53.8%), with the other half employing a multidisciplinary approach. Half of respondents admitted their pheochromocytoma patients to hospital prior to the day of surgery. Postoperatively, 11.5% of respondents routinely admitted their patients to the ICU for monitoring based on personal preference or institutional convention. Multivariate analyses found no significant relationships between demographics or preoperative factors and perioperative management.\nConclusions: Perioperative surgeon management of patients undergoing adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma was highly variable across Canada. Less than half of respondents routinely refer patients for genetic testing, despite recent practice guidelines. Surgeon preference and institutional convention are the main drivers behind preoperative admission and routine postoperative ICU admission, despite a lack of evidence to support this practice.","PeriodicalId":38001,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":"130 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in perioperative management of pheochromocytoma in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Linda C. Qu, A. Istl, Elaine Tang, Richard C. Chaulk, Daryl Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Despite recent consensus guidelines, there is substantial variability in the management of pheochromocytomas. Our study aimed to characterize the current state of perioperative pheochromocytoma management by Canadian surgeons.\\nMethods: A 23-item online survey was sent to Canadian surgeons who perform adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma. We assessed personal and institutional practices, including preoperative and postoperative management.\\nResults: National response rate was 51.8%. Surgeons from nine provinces responded; the majority were general surgeons (70.4%). Reviewing pheochromocytoma patients at a multidisciplinary tumor board was not routine practice (12%) and only 42.3% consistently referred patients for genetic testing. Preoperative α- and β-blockade at half of the respondent institutions were performed by endocrinology alone (53.8%), with the other half employing a multidisciplinary approach. Half of respondents admitted their pheochromocytoma patients to hospital prior to the day of surgery. Postoperatively, 11.5% of respondents routinely admitted their patients to the ICU for monitoring based on personal preference or institutional convention. Multivariate analyses found no significant relationships between demographics or preoperative factors and perioperative management.\\nConclusions: Perioperative surgeon management of patients undergoing adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma was highly variable across Canada. Less than half of respondents routinely refer patients for genetic testing, despite recent practice guidelines. Surgeon preference and institutional convention are the main drivers behind preoperative admission and routine postoperative ICU admission, despite a lack of evidence to support this practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":\"130 46\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variability in perioperative management of pheochromocytoma in Canada
Introduction: Despite recent consensus guidelines, there is substantial variability in the management of pheochromocytomas. Our study aimed to characterize the current state of perioperative pheochromocytoma management by Canadian surgeons.
Methods: A 23-item online survey was sent to Canadian surgeons who perform adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma. We assessed personal and institutional practices, including preoperative and postoperative management.
Results: National response rate was 51.8%. Surgeons from nine provinces responded; the majority were general surgeons (70.4%). Reviewing pheochromocytoma patients at a multidisciplinary tumor board was not routine practice (12%) and only 42.3% consistently referred patients for genetic testing. Preoperative α- and β-blockade at half of the respondent institutions were performed by endocrinology alone (53.8%), with the other half employing a multidisciplinary approach. Half of respondents admitted their pheochromocytoma patients to hospital prior to the day of surgery. Postoperatively, 11.5% of respondents routinely admitted their patients to the ICU for monitoring based on personal preference or institutional convention. Multivariate analyses found no significant relationships between demographics or preoperative factors and perioperative management.
Conclusions: Perioperative surgeon management of patients undergoing adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma was highly variable across Canada. Less than half of respondents routinely refer patients for genetic testing, despite recent practice guidelines. Surgeon preference and institutional convention are the main drivers behind preoperative admission and routine postoperative ICU admission, despite a lack of evidence to support this practice.
期刊介绍:
Published by the Canadian Urological Association, the Canadian Urological Association Journal (CUAJ) released its first issue in March 2007, and was published four times that year under the guidance of founding editor (Editor Emeritus as of 2012), Dr. Laurence H. Klotz. In 2008, CUAJ became a bimonthly publication. As of 2013, articles have been published monthly, alternating between print and online-only versions (print issues are available in February, April, June, August, October, and December; online-only issues are produced in January, March, May, July, September, and November). In 2017, the journal launched an ahead-of-print publishing strategy, in which accepted manuscripts are published electronically on our website and cited on PubMed ahead of their official issue-based publication date. By significantly shortening the time to article availability, we offer our readers more flexibility in the way they engage with our content: as a continuous stream, or in a monthly “package,” or both. CUAJ covers a broad range of urological topics — oncology, pediatrics, transplantation, endourology, female urology, infertility, and more. We take pride in showcasing the work of some of Canada’s top investigators and providing our readers with the latest relevant evidence-based research, and on being the primary repository for major guidelines and other important practice recommendations. Our long-term vision is to become an essential destination for urology-based research, education, and advocacy for both physicians and patients, and to act as a springboard for discussions within the urologic community.