南非 Covid-19 时期工作场所的强制疫苗接种:未来流行病的经验教训

Paul T. Mtunuse, Paul S. Masumbe
{"title":"南非 Covid-19 时期工作场所的强制疫苗接种:未来流行病的经验教训","authors":"Paul T. Mtunuse, Paul S. Masumbe","doi":"10.38159/ehass.20245511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to analyse mandatory vaccinations at the workplace during COVID-19 times in South Africa. COVID-19 was first identified in March 2020 in South Africa. The National State of Disaster was ended by the President on 4 April 2022. However, while economic activities were gradually opening to revive the economy, some employers had issued mandatory vaccinations to all their employees at their workplaces. This was regarded in some quarters as a violation of the rights of workers. This paper however argues that there was a misunderstanding on whether any law authorised these mandatory vaccinations. The study found that forcing employees to vaccinate against their will, despite World Health Organisation (WHO) ethical considerations against mandatory vaccinations, was a violation of their constitutional right to security in and control over their bodies. Furthermore, it found that this violation was not justifiable under the limitation clause. The paper concluded that no law clearly authorised employers to apply mandatory vaccinations at the workplace. The authors hope that employers learnt some lessons from the implementation of COVID-19 mandatory vaccinations. The paper recommends that mandatory vaccinations should not be applied for future pandemics at the workplace without basis or authority of law. The study further recommends that government must develop clear laws and guidelines to regulate mandatory vaccinations for future pandemics in the workplace. The paper exposes the weaknesses of mandatory vaccinations which were applied by employers to employees at their workplaces during COVID-19 times in South Africa. The paper contributes to the growing constitutional and legal discontent of mandatory vaccines in South Africa and beyond to guide governmental intervention in future pandemics as individual rights interface with general health safety.\n\n Keywords: COVID-19, Mandatory Vaccinations, Employees’ rights, Employers, National State of Disaster, Workplace, Lockdown.","PeriodicalId":212587,"journal":{"name":"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandatory Vaccinations at the Workplace during Covid-19 Times in South Africa: Lessons Learnt for Future Pandemics\",\"authors\":\"Paul T. Mtunuse, Paul S. Masumbe\",\"doi\":\"10.38159/ehass.20245511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study was to analyse mandatory vaccinations at the workplace during COVID-19 times in South Africa. COVID-19 was first identified in March 2020 in South Africa. The National State of Disaster was ended by the President on 4 April 2022. However, while economic activities were gradually opening to revive the economy, some employers had issued mandatory vaccinations to all their employees at their workplaces. This was regarded in some quarters as a violation of the rights of workers. This paper however argues that there was a misunderstanding on whether any law authorised these mandatory vaccinations. The study found that forcing employees to vaccinate against their will, despite World Health Organisation (WHO) ethical considerations against mandatory vaccinations, was a violation of their constitutional right to security in and control over their bodies. Furthermore, it found that this violation was not justifiable under the limitation clause. The paper concluded that no law clearly authorised employers to apply mandatory vaccinations at the workplace. The authors hope that employers learnt some lessons from the implementation of COVID-19 mandatory vaccinations. The paper recommends that mandatory vaccinations should not be applied for future pandemics at the workplace without basis or authority of law. The study further recommends that government must develop clear laws and guidelines to regulate mandatory vaccinations for future pandemics in the workplace. The paper exposes the weaknesses of mandatory vaccinations which were applied by employers to employees at their workplaces during COVID-19 times in South Africa. The paper contributes to the growing constitutional and legal discontent of mandatory vaccines in South Africa and beyond to guide governmental intervention in future pandemics as individual rights interface with general health safety.\\n\\n Keywords: COVID-19, Mandatory Vaccinations, Employees’ rights, Employers, National State of Disaster, Workplace, Lockdown.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20245511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20245511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析南非 COVID-19 期间工作场所的强制疫苗接种情况。COVID-19 于 2020 年 3 月首次在南非出现。总统于 2022 年 4 月 4 日结束了全国灾难状态。然而,在经济活动逐渐开放以重振经济的同时,一些雇主却向其工作场所的所有员工发布了强制性疫苗接种。一些人认为这侵犯了工人的权利。但本文认为,在是否有任何法律授权这些强制性疫苗接种的问题上存在误解。研究发现,尽管世界卫生组织(WHO)从伦理角度考虑反对强制接种疫苗,但强迫员工违背自己的意愿接种疫苗侵犯了宪法赋予他们的身体安全权和控制权。此外,论文还发现,根据限制条款,这种侵犯行为是没有道理的。论文的结论是,没有任何法律明确授权雇主在工作场所实施强制接种。作者希望雇主能从 COVID-19 强制性疫苗接种的实施中吸取一些教训。本文建议,在没有法律依据或授权的情况下,不应在工作场所对未来的流行病实施强制接种。研究进一步建议,政府必须制定明确的法律和指导方针,以规范未来工作场所流行病的强制疫苗接种。本文揭露了南非 COVID-19 期间雇主在工作场所对员工实施强制疫苗接种的弱点。本文对南非及其他国家在宪法和法律方面对强制疫苗日益增长的不满情绪做出了贡献,为政府在未来流行病中的干预提供了指导,因为个人权利与总体健康安全是相辅相成的。关键词COVID-19、强制疫苗接种、雇员权利、雇主、国家灾难状态、工作场所、封锁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mandatory Vaccinations at the Workplace during Covid-19 Times in South Africa: Lessons Learnt for Future Pandemics
The purpose of the study was to analyse mandatory vaccinations at the workplace during COVID-19 times in South Africa. COVID-19 was first identified in March 2020 in South Africa. The National State of Disaster was ended by the President on 4 April 2022. However, while economic activities were gradually opening to revive the economy, some employers had issued mandatory vaccinations to all their employees at their workplaces. This was regarded in some quarters as a violation of the rights of workers. This paper however argues that there was a misunderstanding on whether any law authorised these mandatory vaccinations. The study found that forcing employees to vaccinate against their will, despite World Health Organisation (WHO) ethical considerations against mandatory vaccinations, was a violation of their constitutional right to security in and control over their bodies. Furthermore, it found that this violation was not justifiable under the limitation clause. The paper concluded that no law clearly authorised employers to apply mandatory vaccinations at the workplace. The authors hope that employers learnt some lessons from the implementation of COVID-19 mandatory vaccinations. The paper recommends that mandatory vaccinations should not be applied for future pandemics at the workplace without basis or authority of law. The study further recommends that government must develop clear laws and guidelines to regulate mandatory vaccinations for future pandemics in the workplace. The paper exposes the weaknesses of mandatory vaccinations which were applied by employers to employees at their workplaces during COVID-19 times in South Africa. The paper contributes to the growing constitutional and legal discontent of mandatory vaccines in South Africa and beyond to guide governmental intervention in future pandemics as individual rights interface with general health safety. Keywords: COVID-19, Mandatory Vaccinations, Employees’ rights, Employers, National State of Disaster, Workplace, Lockdown.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fostering Decolonization, Reading and Multilingualism through Book Donation: A Case Study of One Primary School in South Africa Missio Maritatus in the Missio Dei: Genesis 1:28 for Marriage Missiology The Role of Translanguaging in Teaching Mathematics at Adult Correctional Centre Classrooms in South Africa Assessing Students` Experiences of Psychosocial Support for Sustainable Learning at a South African TVET College Mandatory Vaccinations at the Workplace during Covid-19 Times in South Africa: Lessons Learnt for Future Pandemics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1