可接受噪音水平受竞争性谈话者数量的影响吗?信息屏蔽和倾听对可接受噪音水平机制的影响

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Auditory and Vestibular Research Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.18502/avr.v33i3.15506
Mostafa Tavakoli, Hamid Jalilvand, Mohammad Ebrahim Mahdavi, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
{"title":"可接受噪音水平受竞争性谈话者数量的影响吗?信息屏蔽和倾听对可接受噪音水平机制的影响","authors":"Mostafa Tavakoli, Hamid Jalilvand, Mohammad Ebrahim Mahdavi, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban","doi":"10.18502/avr.v33i3.15506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: The Acceptable Noise Level (ANL), which is an effective  clinical tool for quantitative assessment of noise tolerance, is affected by some known variables related to both subject and testing materials. The present study examined how the characteristics of different babble noises may affect the ANL results in normal adult listeners. \nMethods: Forty Persian listeners with normal hearing participated. In addition to typical ANL testing with 12-talker noise, the ANL was obtained in 8 different conditions varying in number of talkers from 2 to 10 in the babble noises presenting forward and backward. \nResults: There was a significantly lower ANL for 2-talker babble compared to 4, 8, 10, and 12-talker babble in both forward and backward noise conditions. With the increase in talkers in noise, the ANL becomes worse but reaches almost a plateau with more than 4 talkers in babble noise. There was a statistically significant difference between 2-talker forward and 2-talker backward noises, with no difference for the other conditions. \nConclusion: This finding that the ANL is affected by the number of talkers in babble noise and by the forward and backward background noise suggests that informational masking and listening in dip mechanisms are involved in ANL for normal hearing people at least. \nKeywords: Acceptable noise level; speech babble noise; listening in dips; informational masking; energetic masking \n ","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Acceptable Noise Level Affected by the Number of Competitive Talkers? An Implication of Informational Masking and Listening in Dips for Acceptable Noise Level Mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Tavakoli, Hamid Jalilvand, Mohammad Ebrahim Mahdavi, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/avr.v33i3.15506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: The Acceptable Noise Level (ANL), which is an effective  clinical tool for quantitative assessment of noise tolerance, is affected by some known variables related to both subject and testing materials. The present study examined how the characteristics of different babble noises may affect the ANL results in normal adult listeners. \\nMethods: Forty Persian listeners with normal hearing participated. In addition to typical ANL testing with 12-talker noise, the ANL was obtained in 8 different conditions varying in number of talkers from 2 to 10 in the babble noises presenting forward and backward. \\nResults: There was a significantly lower ANL for 2-talker babble compared to 4, 8, 10, and 12-talker babble in both forward and backward noise conditions. With the increase in talkers in noise, the ANL becomes worse but reaches almost a plateau with more than 4 talkers in babble noise. There was a statistically significant difference between 2-talker forward and 2-talker backward noises, with no difference for the other conditions. \\nConclusion: This finding that the ANL is affected by the number of talkers in babble noise and by the forward and backward background noise suggests that informational masking and listening in dip mechanisms are involved in ANL for normal hearing people at least. \\nKeywords: Acceptable noise level; speech babble noise; listening in dips; informational masking; energetic masking \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":34089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v33i3.15506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v33i3.15506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:可接受噪音水平(ANL)是定量评估噪音耐受性的有效临床工具,但它会受到与受试者和测试材料有关的一些已知变量的影响。本研究探讨了不同咿呀声的特点会如何影响正常成年听者的可接受噪音水平结果。研究方法40 名听力正常的波斯听众参加了研究。除了使用 12 个说话者的典型 ANL 测试外,还在 8 种不同的条件下获得了 ANL,这些条件是在咿呀噪音中向前和向后呈现 2 到 10 个说话者。结果显示在正向和反向噪音条件下,与 4、8、10 和 12 人咿呀学语相比,2 人咿呀学语的 ANL 明显较低。随着噪音中说话者的增加,ANL 越来越低,但当咿呀噪音中的说话者超过 4 个时,ANL 几乎达到了平稳状态。在统计意义上,2 个说话者的前向噪音和 2 个说话者的后向噪音之间存在显著差异,而其他条件下则没有差异。结论ANL受咿呀学语噪声中说话者的数量以及前向和后向背景噪声的影响,这一发现表明,至少对于听力正常的人来说,信息掩蔽和倾听机制参与了ANL。关键词可接受噪声级;咿呀学语噪声;倾听;信息掩蔽;能量掩蔽
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Acceptable Noise Level Affected by the Number of Competitive Talkers? An Implication of Informational Masking and Listening in Dips for Acceptable Noise Level Mechanism
Background and Aim: The Acceptable Noise Level (ANL), which is an effective  clinical tool for quantitative assessment of noise tolerance, is affected by some known variables related to both subject and testing materials. The present study examined how the characteristics of different babble noises may affect the ANL results in normal adult listeners. Methods: Forty Persian listeners with normal hearing participated. In addition to typical ANL testing with 12-talker noise, the ANL was obtained in 8 different conditions varying in number of talkers from 2 to 10 in the babble noises presenting forward and backward. Results: There was a significantly lower ANL for 2-talker babble compared to 4, 8, 10, and 12-talker babble in both forward and backward noise conditions. With the increase in talkers in noise, the ANL becomes worse but reaches almost a plateau with more than 4 talkers in babble noise. There was a statistically significant difference between 2-talker forward and 2-talker backward noises, with no difference for the other conditions. Conclusion: This finding that the ANL is affected by the number of talkers in babble noise and by the forward and backward background noise suggests that informational masking and listening in dip mechanisms are involved in ANL for normal hearing people at least. Keywords: Acceptable noise level; speech babble noise; listening in dips; informational masking; energetic masking  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Spectral and Temporal Processing Abilities between Adults with Stroke and Healthy Peers Early Communication Skills Training for Infants and Toddlers with Cochlear ImplantEarly Communication Skills Training for Infants and Toddlers with Cochlear Implant Frequency of Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 and Cytomegalovirus in Perilymph and Peripheral Blood Samples of Cochlear-Implanted Children Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction Method Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Spatial Learning and Memory of Rats Acoustic Analysis of Fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ and Affricate /ʧ/ in Persian-Speaking Cochlear-Implanted Children and Normal-Hearing Peers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1