巴西 SP 坎皮纳斯有现场污水处理系统的冲积平原上的人为钆异常现象

Ana Elisa Silva Abreu, J. Enzweiler, Sueli Yoshinaga-Pereira, Osvaldo Jorge Brito Rupias, Adriana Marques, Miriam Gonçalves Miguel, Joana de Miranda Alencar
{"title":"巴西 SP 坎皮纳斯有现场污水处理系统的冲积平原上的人为钆异常现象","authors":"Ana Elisa Silva Abreu, J. Enzweiler, Sueli Yoshinaga-Pereira, Osvaldo Jorge Brito Rupias, Adriana Marques, Miriam Gonçalves Miguel, Joana de Miranda Alencar","doi":"10.21715/gb2358-2812.202438001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gadolinium anomalies have become a well-established marker for the pollution caused by wastewater, but there is not yet a standardized method to estimate the anomaly. Here, we compare four different published equations, distinct threshold values and reference normalizing values to estimate Gd anomalies by applying them to the results of a hydrochemical investigation in an alluvial aquifer with on-site sanitation systems. We measured traditional wastewater markers (such as electric conductivity, NO3_N, NH4–N, Cl-) and REE in groundwater samples collected from hand-dug wells in two seasons. The ratios of Gd normalized measured concentrations to Gd normalized geogenic concentrations (GdSN/Gd*) estimated with the various methods ranged from 0.7 to 2.8. It turned out that the choice of the equation and the threshold value can affect the decisions about anthropogenic pollution’s occurrence (or not). The normalizing values did not play a significant role in the decision. Based on measurement uncertainties and on the interpretation of hydrogeological conditions in the study area, a threshold value of 1.3 for defining anthropogenic Gd anomalies was deemed adequate for the study area. The occurrence of Gd anomalies higher than 1.8 in two wells, one in each season, reinforces the hypothesis that the groundwater is contaminated by the on-site sanitation systems in the study area, as intermittent detection of anthropogenic Gd is a characteristic of this pollution source.","PeriodicalId":34597,"journal":{"name":"Geochimica Brasiliensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropogenic Gadolinium Anomalies in an Alluvial Plain with On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems in Campinas, SP, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Ana Elisa Silva Abreu, J. Enzweiler, Sueli Yoshinaga-Pereira, Osvaldo Jorge Brito Rupias, Adriana Marques, Miriam Gonçalves Miguel, Joana de Miranda Alencar\",\"doi\":\"10.21715/gb2358-2812.202438001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gadolinium anomalies have become a well-established marker for the pollution caused by wastewater, but there is not yet a standardized method to estimate the anomaly. Here, we compare four different published equations, distinct threshold values and reference normalizing values to estimate Gd anomalies by applying them to the results of a hydrochemical investigation in an alluvial aquifer with on-site sanitation systems. We measured traditional wastewater markers (such as electric conductivity, NO3_N, NH4–N, Cl-) and REE in groundwater samples collected from hand-dug wells in two seasons. The ratios of Gd normalized measured concentrations to Gd normalized geogenic concentrations (GdSN/Gd*) estimated with the various methods ranged from 0.7 to 2.8. It turned out that the choice of the equation and the threshold value can affect the decisions about anthropogenic pollution’s occurrence (or not). The normalizing values did not play a significant role in the decision. Based on measurement uncertainties and on the interpretation of hydrogeological conditions in the study area, a threshold value of 1.3 for defining anthropogenic Gd anomalies was deemed adequate for the study area. The occurrence of Gd anomalies higher than 1.8 in two wells, one in each season, reinforces the hypothesis that the groundwater is contaminated by the on-site sanitation systems in the study area, as intermittent detection of anthropogenic Gd is a characteristic of this pollution source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochimica Brasiliensis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochimica Brasiliensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21715/gb2358-2812.202438001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochimica Brasiliensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21715/gb2358-2812.202438001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钆异常已成为废水污染的公认标志,但目前还没有一种标准化的方法来估算异常值。在此,我们比较了四种不同的已公布方程、不同的阈值和参考归一化值,并将其应用于有现场卫生系统的冲积含水层的水化学调查结果,以估算钆异常。我们测量了两个季节从人工挖井采集的地下水样本中的传统废水标记(如电导率、NO3_N、NH4-N、Cl-)和 REE。用各种方法估算的钆归一化测量浓度与钆归一化地质浓度之比(GdSN/Gd*)从 0.7 到 2.8 不等。结果表明,方程和临界值的选择会影响人为污染发生(或不发生)的决定。归一化值在决策中的作用并不大。根据测量的不确定性和对研究区域水文地质条件的解释,认为 1.3 的阈值足以确定研究区域的人为钆异常。两个水井(每个季节一个)中出现的 Gd 异常值均高于 1.8,这加强了地下水受到研究区现场卫生系统污染的假设,因为间歇性检测到人为 Gd 是这种污染源的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anthropogenic Gadolinium Anomalies in an Alluvial Plain with On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems in Campinas, SP, Brazil
Gadolinium anomalies have become a well-established marker for the pollution caused by wastewater, but there is not yet a standardized method to estimate the anomaly. Here, we compare four different published equations, distinct threshold values and reference normalizing values to estimate Gd anomalies by applying them to the results of a hydrochemical investigation in an alluvial aquifer with on-site sanitation systems. We measured traditional wastewater markers (such as electric conductivity, NO3_N, NH4–N, Cl-) and REE in groundwater samples collected from hand-dug wells in two seasons. The ratios of Gd normalized measured concentrations to Gd normalized geogenic concentrations (GdSN/Gd*) estimated with the various methods ranged from 0.7 to 2.8. It turned out that the choice of the equation and the threshold value can affect the decisions about anthropogenic pollution’s occurrence (or not). The normalizing values did not play a significant role in the decision. Based on measurement uncertainties and on the interpretation of hydrogeological conditions in the study area, a threshold value of 1.3 for defining anthropogenic Gd anomalies was deemed adequate for the study area. The occurrence of Gd anomalies higher than 1.8 in two wells, one in each season, reinforces the hypothesis that the groundwater is contaminated by the on-site sanitation systems in the study area, as intermittent detection of anthropogenic Gd is a characteristic of this pollution source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anthropogenic Gadolinium Anomalies in an Alluvial Plain with On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems in Campinas, SP, Brazil Mining's legacy: Unraveling the impacts of acid mine drainage on the rivers and streams of the Santa Catarina coal region, Brazil Presence and quantification of the microplastics and bisphenol-A in sediments along the Guanabara Bay, Brazil PPlot, a webapp to partition geochemical data and isolate mixed subpopulations using probability plot modeling Geochemical stream sediment signatures from Precambrian terrains of Uruguay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1