噪声中的输出信噪比和言语感知:多通道和自由通道助听器的影响

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Auditory and Vestibular Research Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.18502/avr.v33i3.15507
Shubhaganga Dhrruvakumar, Vishal Kooknoor, Rakesh Chowkalli Veerabhadrappa
{"title":"噪声中的输出信噪比和言语感知:多通道和自由通道助听器的影响","authors":"Shubhaganga Dhrruvakumar, Vishal Kooknoor, Rakesh Chowkalli Veerabhadrappa","doi":"10.18502/avr.v33i3.15507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: The output Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) is one of the essential factors in hearing aid benefits. There is limited evidence regarding SNR improvement     by the Channel-Free (CFHA) and Multi-Channel Hearing Aid (MCHA) and the speech understanding in noise through them. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which output SNR was modified by CFHA and MCHA processing and the variation in aided speech recognition abilities with a change in output SNR. \nMethods: Thirty-six participants aged 50–65 years were included. A chosen CFHA and MCHA were used to obtain the output SNR and sentence recognition in noise in four different processing algorithms (linear, linear+noise reduction, WDRC, WDRC+noise reduction). Hagerman’s phase inversion technique was used to measure the attenuation of noise and, in turn, to obtain the output SNR of the hearing aid. \nResults: In all hearing aid processing algorithms among those with normal hearing and people with hearing loss, the output of CFHA revealed higher attenuation values than that of MCHA. There was a significant effect of the hearing aids and processing algorithms in both normal and individuals with hearing impairment on the mean SNR. Further, multiple linear regression analysis results showed that whether the hearing is channel-free or multi- channel significantly predicted speech recognition scores, while output SNR and processing algorithms did not. \nConclusion: The signal processing algorithms in CFHA had greater noise attenuation values, better output SNR, and speech recognition scores, showing an advantage over the modern MCHA among individuals with hearing impairment. \n  \nKeywords: Channel-free hearing aids; multi-channel hearing aids; sensorineural hearing loss; speech recognition","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Output Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Perception in Noise: The Effect of Multichannel and Free-Channel Hearing Aids\",\"authors\":\"Shubhaganga Dhrruvakumar, Vishal Kooknoor, Rakesh Chowkalli Veerabhadrappa\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/avr.v33i3.15507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: The output Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) is one of the essential factors in hearing aid benefits. There is limited evidence regarding SNR improvement     by the Channel-Free (CFHA) and Multi-Channel Hearing Aid (MCHA) and the speech understanding in noise through them. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which output SNR was modified by CFHA and MCHA processing and the variation in aided speech recognition abilities with a change in output SNR. \\nMethods: Thirty-six participants aged 50–65 years were included. A chosen CFHA and MCHA were used to obtain the output SNR and sentence recognition in noise in four different processing algorithms (linear, linear+noise reduction, WDRC, WDRC+noise reduction). Hagerman’s phase inversion technique was used to measure the attenuation of noise and, in turn, to obtain the output SNR of the hearing aid. \\nResults: In all hearing aid processing algorithms among those with normal hearing and people with hearing loss, the output of CFHA revealed higher attenuation values than that of MCHA. There was a significant effect of the hearing aids and processing algorithms in both normal and individuals with hearing impairment on the mean SNR. Further, multiple linear regression analysis results showed that whether the hearing is channel-free or multi- channel significantly predicted speech recognition scores, while output SNR and processing algorithms did not. \\nConclusion: The signal processing algorithms in CFHA had greater noise attenuation values, better output SNR, and speech recognition scores, showing an advantage over the modern MCHA among individuals with hearing impairment. \\n  \\nKeywords: Channel-free hearing aids; multi-channel hearing aids; sensorineural hearing loss; speech recognition\",\"PeriodicalId\":34089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v33i3.15507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v33i3.15507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:输出信噪比(SNR)是助听器效益的重要因素之一。关于无通道(CFHA)和多通道助听器(MCHA)对信噪比的改善以及通过它们在噪声中的言语理解能力,目前证据有限。本研究旨在调查 CFHA 和 MCHA 处理对输出信噪比的影响程度,以及输出信噪比变化对辅助语音识别能力的影响。研究方法研究对象包括 36 名 50-65 岁的参与者。在四种不同的处理算法(线性、线性+降噪、WDRC、WDRC+降噪)中,使用选定的 CFHA 和 MCHA 获得输出信噪比和噪声中的句子识别率。哈格曼相位反转技术用于测量噪声衰减,进而获得助听器的输出信噪比。结果:在听力正常者和听力损失者的所有助听器处理算法中,CFHA 的输出显示出比 MCHA 更高的衰减值。在听力正常者和听力受损者中,助听器和处理算法对平均信噪比有明显影响。此外,多元线性回归分析结果显示,听力是无信道还是多信道能显著预测语音识别得分,而输出信噪比和处理算法则不能。结论CFHA 的信号处理算法具有更大的噪声衰减值、更好的输出信噪比和语音识别得分,与现代 MCHA 相比,在听障人士中显示出优势。 关键词无通道助听器;多通道助听器;感音神经性听力损失;语音识别
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Output Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Perception in Noise: The Effect of Multichannel and Free-Channel Hearing Aids
Background and Aim: The output Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) is one of the essential factors in hearing aid benefits. There is limited evidence regarding SNR improvement     by the Channel-Free (CFHA) and Multi-Channel Hearing Aid (MCHA) and the speech understanding in noise through them. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which output SNR was modified by CFHA and MCHA processing and the variation in aided speech recognition abilities with a change in output SNR. Methods: Thirty-six participants aged 50–65 years were included. A chosen CFHA and MCHA were used to obtain the output SNR and sentence recognition in noise in four different processing algorithms (linear, linear+noise reduction, WDRC, WDRC+noise reduction). Hagerman’s phase inversion technique was used to measure the attenuation of noise and, in turn, to obtain the output SNR of the hearing aid. Results: In all hearing aid processing algorithms among those with normal hearing and people with hearing loss, the output of CFHA revealed higher attenuation values than that of MCHA. There was a significant effect of the hearing aids and processing algorithms in both normal and individuals with hearing impairment on the mean SNR. Further, multiple linear regression analysis results showed that whether the hearing is channel-free or multi- channel significantly predicted speech recognition scores, while output SNR and processing algorithms did not. Conclusion: The signal processing algorithms in CFHA had greater noise attenuation values, better output SNR, and speech recognition scores, showing an advantage over the modern MCHA among individuals with hearing impairment.   Keywords: Channel-free hearing aids; multi-channel hearing aids; sensorineural hearing loss; speech recognition
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Spectral and Temporal Processing Abilities between Adults with Stroke and Healthy Peers Early Communication Skills Training for Infants and Toddlers with Cochlear ImplantEarly Communication Skills Training for Infants and Toddlers with Cochlear Implant Frequency of Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 and Cytomegalovirus in Perilymph and Peripheral Blood Samples of Cochlear-Implanted Children Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction Method Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Spatial Learning and Memory of Rats Acoustic Analysis of Fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ and Affricate /ʧ/ in Persian-Speaking Cochlear-Implanted Children and Normal-Hearing Peers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1