库尔德内部的戈兰尼基板

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Historical Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1075/jhl.23001.moh
Masoud Mohammadirad
{"title":"库尔德内部的戈兰尼基板","authors":"Masoud Mohammadirad","doi":"10.1075/jhl.23001.moh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The traditional view within Kurdish linguistics is that the split between Central Kurdish (CK) and Northern\n Kurdish (NK) is mainly the result of a Gorani substrate within the former group. More recent studies refute this hypothesis,\n arguing instead that Kurdish was initially composed of two distinct but closely related subgroups and that the differences between\n CK and NK are partly due to distinct source languages and partly due to ensuing contact with neighbouring languages. This study\n aims to shed new light on the Gorani-substrate hypothesis within CK by examining a corpus-based study of the southernmost CK\n dialects located within the historical Gorani heartland. Combining recent historical accounts of language shift from Gorani to CK\n in the region with linguistic data, the paper claims that (i) Gorani borrowings and substrate features reflect different layers of\n historical contact in Southern CK dialects and (ii) the Gorani substrate has caused a split in the morphosyntactic features across\n vernaculars of CK, showcasing second-language learning in shaping the historically recent development of Southern CK dialects.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gorani substrate within Kurdish\",\"authors\":\"Masoud Mohammadirad\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhl.23001.moh\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The traditional view within Kurdish linguistics is that the split between Central Kurdish (CK) and Northern\\n Kurdish (NK) is mainly the result of a Gorani substrate within the former group. More recent studies refute this hypothesis,\\n arguing instead that Kurdish was initially composed of two distinct but closely related subgroups and that the differences between\\n CK and NK are partly due to distinct source languages and partly due to ensuing contact with neighbouring languages. This study\\n aims to shed new light on the Gorani-substrate hypothesis within CK by examining a corpus-based study of the southernmost CK\\n dialects located within the historical Gorani heartland. Combining recent historical accounts of language shift from Gorani to CK\\n in the region with linguistic data, the paper claims that (i) Gorani borrowings and substrate features reflect different layers of\\n historical contact in Southern CK dialects and (ii) the Gorani substrate has caused a split in the morphosyntactic features across\\n vernaculars of CK, showcasing second-language learning in shaping the historically recent development of Southern CK dialects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.23001.moh\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.23001.moh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

库尔德语言学的传统观点认为,中库尔德语(CK)和北库尔德语(NK)之间的分裂主要是前者内部戈兰尼语基质的结果。最近的研究反驳了这一假设,认为库尔德语最初由两个不同但密切相关的亚群组成,中库尔德语和北库尔德语之间的差异部分源于不同的源语言,部分源于随后与邻近语言的接触。本研究旨在通过对位于戈兰尼历史中心地带最南端的喀什米尔语方言进行基于语料库的研究,揭示戈兰尼-基底假说在喀什米尔语中的新含义。结合最近关于该地区语言从戈拉尼语向长江语转移的历史记载和语言学数据,本文认为:(i)戈拉尼语借用和基质特征反映了长江南部方言历史接触的不同层次;(ii)戈拉尼语基质造成了长江各方言形态句法特征的分裂,展示了第二语言学习在塑造长江南部方言近期历史发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gorani substrate within Kurdish
The traditional view within Kurdish linguistics is that the split between Central Kurdish (CK) and Northern Kurdish (NK) is mainly the result of a Gorani substrate within the former group. More recent studies refute this hypothesis, arguing instead that Kurdish was initially composed of two distinct but closely related subgroups and that the differences between CK and NK are partly due to distinct source languages and partly due to ensuing contact with neighbouring languages. This study aims to shed new light on the Gorani-substrate hypothesis within CK by examining a corpus-based study of the southernmost CK dialects located within the historical Gorani heartland. Combining recent historical accounts of language shift from Gorani to CK in the region with linguistic data, the paper claims that (i) Gorani borrowings and substrate features reflect different layers of historical contact in Southern CK dialects and (ii) the Gorani substrate has caused a split in the morphosyntactic features across vernaculars of CK, showcasing second-language learning in shaping the historically recent development of Southern CK dialects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
The syntactic and semantic promenade of the Spanish absolute construction along the Communicative Continuum Variant patterns of sibilant debuccalization in Camuno Gorani substrate within Kurdish Visual perception verbs in Old Anatolian Turkish Diachronic pathways to case marking alignment and what they mean for the explanation of synchronic cross-linguistic patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1