监狱改革的阵痛:爱沙尼亚和立陶宛的非正式囚犯管理和刑罚主体性

Gavin Slade, Olga Zeveleva
{"title":"监狱改革的阵痛:爱沙尼亚和立陶宛的非正式囚犯管理和刑罚主体性","authors":"Gavin Slade, Olga Zeveleva","doi":"10.1177/14624745241248930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on the growing literature on the varying degrees and dimensions of prisoner governance across prison systems, this paper aims to understand how such governance, and reforms to reduce its informal influences, shape prisoner experiences in Estonia and Lithuania. Estonia has limited the influence of prisoner governance through the creation of a cell-based prison system, while Lithuania has maintained penal colonies in which prisoners largely self-govern. Utilizing a metaphor approach to the pains of imprisonment, we offer the concept of an imposition gradient to capture variation in the experience of the weight and tightness produced by both prison authorities and prisoners themselves across our cases. The paper makes three contributions: first, it aims to explicitly assess the relationship between varieties of prisoner governance and penal subjectivities. Second, it rethinks the relatively static metaphors of weight and tightness as fluid and dynamic experiences shaped by the degrees of prisoner governance present within prison systems and particular spaces of particular prisons. Third, the paper speaks to recent appeals to develop comparative research into varieties of imprisonment regimes, deepening comparative theories of prison order across the Global North and South.","PeriodicalId":508618,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society","volume":"43 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pains of prison reform: Informal prisoner governance and penal subjectivities in Estonia and Lithuania\",\"authors\":\"Gavin Slade, Olga Zeveleva\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14624745241248930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on the growing literature on the varying degrees and dimensions of prisoner governance across prison systems, this paper aims to understand how such governance, and reforms to reduce its informal influences, shape prisoner experiences in Estonia and Lithuania. Estonia has limited the influence of prisoner governance through the creation of a cell-based prison system, while Lithuania has maintained penal colonies in which prisoners largely self-govern. Utilizing a metaphor approach to the pains of imprisonment, we offer the concept of an imposition gradient to capture variation in the experience of the weight and tightness produced by both prison authorities and prisoners themselves across our cases. The paper makes three contributions: first, it aims to explicitly assess the relationship between varieties of prisoner governance and penal subjectivities. Second, it rethinks the relatively static metaphors of weight and tightness as fluid and dynamic experiences shaped by the degrees of prisoner governance present within prison systems and particular spaces of particular prisons. Third, the paper speaks to recent appeals to develop comparative research into varieties of imprisonment regimes, deepening comparative theories of prison order across the Global North and South.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Punishment & Society\",\"volume\":\"43 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Punishment & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745241248930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punishment & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745241248930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的文献论述了不同监狱系统中囚犯管理的不同程度和层面,本文在此基础上,旨在了解爱沙尼亚和立陶宛的囚犯管理以及为减少其非正式影响而进行的改革是如何影响囚犯体验的。爱沙尼亚通过建立以牢房为基础的监狱系统限制了囚犯管理的影响,而立陶宛则保留了囚犯在很大程度上自治的刑罚殖民地。利用隐喻的方法来研究监禁的痛苦,我们提出了 "强加梯度 "的概念,以捕捉不同案例中监狱当局和囚犯自身所产生的沉重感和紧绷感的体验差异。本文有三方面的贡献:首先,本文旨在明确评估各种囚犯管理与刑罚主体性之间的关系。其次,本文重新思考了相对静态的 "重量 "和 "紧度 "隐喻,将其视为由监狱系统和特定监狱的特定空间内囚犯管理程度所形成的流动和动态体验。第三,本文响应了近期关于开展各种监禁制度比较研究的呼吁,深化了全球南北监狱秩序的比较理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The pains of prison reform: Informal prisoner governance and penal subjectivities in Estonia and Lithuania
Building on the growing literature on the varying degrees and dimensions of prisoner governance across prison systems, this paper aims to understand how such governance, and reforms to reduce its informal influences, shape prisoner experiences in Estonia and Lithuania. Estonia has limited the influence of prisoner governance through the creation of a cell-based prison system, while Lithuania has maintained penal colonies in which prisoners largely self-govern. Utilizing a metaphor approach to the pains of imprisonment, we offer the concept of an imposition gradient to capture variation in the experience of the weight and tightness produced by both prison authorities and prisoners themselves across our cases. The paper makes three contributions: first, it aims to explicitly assess the relationship between varieties of prisoner governance and penal subjectivities. Second, it rethinks the relatively static metaphors of weight and tightness as fluid and dynamic experiences shaped by the degrees of prisoner governance present within prison systems and particular spaces of particular prisons. Third, the paper speaks to recent appeals to develop comparative research into varieties of imprisonment regimes, deepening comparative theories of prison order across the Global North and South.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘Standing with Soldier F’: Bloody Sunday, disrupting the degradation ceremony and the court of public opinion “The COVID-19 Murders”: Prison death-worlds and the fatal convenience of crisis Contaminated memories: How formerly incarcerated mothers remember their pasts and imagine their futures Book review: Impending Challenges to Penal Moderation in France and Germany: A Strained Restraint by Kirstin Drenkhahn, Fabien Jobard and Tobias Singelnstein A path to tertiary desistance: A qualitative metasynthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1