你可以尽情享用你的蛋糕:确保联合学习的实用稳健性和隐私性

Nojan Sheybani, F. Koushanfar
{"title":"你可以尽情享用你的蛋糕:确保联合学习的实用稳健性和隐私性","authors":"Nojan Sheybani, F. Koushanfar","doi":"10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inherently, federated learning (FL) robustness is very challenging to guarantee, especially when trying to maintain privacy. Compared to standard ML settings, FL's open training process allows for malicious clients to easily go under the radar. Alongside this, malicious clients can easily collude to attack the training process continuously, and without detection. FL models are also still susceptible to attacks on standard ML training procedures. This massive attack surface makes balancing the tradeoff between utility, practicality, robustness, and privacy extremely challenging. While there have been proposed defenses to attacks using popular privacy-preserving primitives, such as fully homomorphic encryption, they often face trouble balancing an all-important question that is present in all privacy-preserving systems: How much utility and practicality am I willing to give up to ensure privacy and robustness? In this work, we discuss a practical approach towards secure and robust FL and the challenges that face this field of emerging research.","PeriodicalId":516827,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You Can Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: Ensuring Practical Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learning\",\"authors\":\"Nojan Sheybani, F. Koushanfar\",\"doi\":\"10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inherently, federated learning (FL) robustness is very challenging to guarantee, especially when trying to maintain privacy. Compared to standard ML settings, FL's open training process allows for malicious clients to easily go under the radar. Alongside this, malicious clients can easily collude to attack the training process continuously, and without detection. FL models are also still susceptible to attacks on standard ML training procedures. This massive attack surface makes balancing the tradeoff between utility, practicality, robustness, and privacy extremely challenging. While there have been proposed defenses to attacks using popular privacy-preserving primitives, such as fully homomorphic encryption, they often face trouble balancing an all-important question that is present in all privacy-preserving systems: How much utility and practicality am I willing to give up to ensure privacy and robustness? In this work, we discuss a practical approach towards secure and robust FL and the challenges that face this field of emerging research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从本质上讲,联合学习(FL)的稳健性很难保证,尤其是在试图维护隐私时。与标准 ML 设置相比,FL 的开放式训练过程可以让恶意客户端轻易地隐藏起来。与此同时,恶意客户端可以轻易地串通起来,在不被发现的情况下持续攻击训练过程。FL 模型仍然容易受到标准 ML 训练程序的攻击。这种巨大的攻击面使得平衡实用性、实用性、稳健性和隐私性之间的关系变得极具挑战性。虽然有人提出了使用流行的隐私保护原语(如全同态加密)来抵御攻击的方法,但这些方法在平衡所有隐私保护系统中都存在的一个重要问题上往往会遇到困难:为了确保隐私和稳健性,我愿意放弃多少实用性和实用性?在这项工作中,我们将讨论实现安全、稳健 FL 的实用方法,以及这一新兴研究领域所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
You Can Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: Ensuring Practical Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learning
Inherently, federated learning (FL) robustness is very challenging to guarantee, especially when trying to maintain privacy. Compared to standard ML settings, FL's open training process allows for malicious clients to easily go under the radar. Alongside this, malicious clients can easily collude to attack the training process continuously, and without detection. FL models are also still susceptible to attacks on standard ML training procedures. This massive attack surface makes balancing the tradeoff between utility, practicality, robustness, and privacy extremely challenging. While there have been proposed defenses to attacks using popular privacy-preserving primitives, such as fully homomorphic encryption, they often face trouble balancing an all-important question that is present in all privacy-preserving systems: How much utility and practicality am I willing to give up to ensure privacy and robustness? In this work, we discuss a practical approach towards secure and robust FL and the challenges that face this field of emerging research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modes of Tracking Mal-Info in Social Media with AI/ML Tools to Help Mitigate Harmful GenAI for Improved Societal Well Being Embodying Human-Like Modes of Balance Control Through Human-In-the-Loop Dyadic Learning Constructing Deep Concepts through Shallow Search Implications of Identity in AI: Creators, Creations, and Consequences ASMR: Aggregated Semantic Matching Retrieval Unleashing Commonsense Ability of LLM through Open-Ended Question Answering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1