{"title":"用于 SIBI 图像分类的 CNN 架构对比分析","authors":"Yulrio Brianorman, Dewi Utami","doi":"10.30595/juita.v12i1.20608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classification of images from the Indonesian Sign Language System (SIBI) using VGG16, ResNet50, Inception, Xception, and MobileNetV2 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures is evaluated in this paper. With Google Colab Pro, a 224 × 224-pixel picture dataset was used for the study. A five-stage technique consisting of Dataset Collection, Dataset Preprocessing, Model Design, Model Training, and Model Testing was applied. Performance evaluation focused on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score. The results identified VGG16 as the top-performing model with an accuracy of 99.60% and an equivalent F1-Score, followed closely by ResNet50 with nearly similar performance. Inception, XCeption, and MobileNetV2 demonstrated balanced performance but with lower accuracy. This study sheds light on the best CNN models to choose for SIBI image classification, and it makes recommendations for further research that include using sophisticated data augmentation methods, investigating novel CNN architectures, and putting the models to practical use.","PeriodicalId":151254,"journal":{"name":"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika","volume":"66 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures for SIBI Image Classification\",\"authors\":\"Yulrio Brianorman, Dewi Utami\",\"doi\":\"10.30595/juita.v12i1.20608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classification of images from the Indonesian Sign Language System (SIBI) using VGG16, ResNet50, Inception, Xception, and MobileNetV2 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures is evaluated in this paper. With Google Colab Pro, a 224 × 224-pixel picture dataset was used for the study. A five-stage technique consisting of Dataset Collection, Dataset Preprocessing, Model Design, Model Training, and Model Testing was applied. Performance evaluation focused on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score. The results identified VGG16 as the top-performing model with an accuracy of 99.60% and an equivalent F1-Score, followed closely by ResNet50 with nearly similar performance. Inception, XCeption, and MobileNetV2 demonstrated balanced performance but with lower accuracy. This study sheds light on the best CNN models to choose for SIBI image classification, and it makes recommendations for further research that include using sophisticated data augmentation methods, investigating novel CNN architectures, and putting the models to practical use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v12i1.20608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v12i1.20608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文评估了使用 VGG16、ResNet50、Inception、Xception 和 MobileNetV2 卷积神经网络(CNN)架构对印度尼西亚手语系统(SIBI)图像进行分类的情况。研究使用了 Google Colab Pro 的 224 × 224 像素图片数据集。研究采用了五阶段技术,包括数据集收集、数据集预处理、模型设计、模型训练和模型测试。性能评估的重点是准确率、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数。结果表明,VGG16 是表现最好的模型,准确率为 99.60%,F1-Score 与之相当,紧随其后的是 ResNet50,表现几乎相似。Inception、XCeption 和 MobileNetV2 表现均衡,但准确率较低。本研究揭示了用于 SIBI 图像分类的最佳 CNN 模型,并提出了进一步研究的建议,包括使用复杂的数据增强方法、研究新型 CNN 架构以及将模型投入实际使用。
Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures for SIBI Image Classification
The classification of images from the Indonesian Sign Language System (SIBI) using VGG16, ResNet50, Inception, Xception, and MobileNetV2 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures is evaluated in this paper. With Google Colab Pro, a 224 × 224-pixel picture dataset was used for the study. A five-stage technique consisting of Dataset Collection, Dataset Preprocessing, Model Design, Model Training, and Model Testing was applied. Performance evaluation focused on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score. The results identified VGG16 as the top-performing model with an accuracy of 99.60% and an equivalent F1-Score, followed closely by ResNet50 with nearly similar performance. Inception, XCeption, and MobileNetV2 demonstrated balanced performance but with lower accuracy. This study sheds light on the best CNN models to choose for SIBI image classification, and it makes recommendations for further research that include using sophisticated data augmentation methods, investigating novel CNN architectures, and putting the models to practical use.