Relationship Between Diameter and Pelvic Vein Reflux

Diameter has been a complementary measurement in the evaluation of venous valvular insufficiency of superficial veins of the lower extremity. Small veins with reflux or large veins without reflux may indicate alternative treatments. Awareness of pelvic vein reflux is increasing. The pelvic vein diameter-reflux relationship was investigated. Findings of lower extremity ultrasound (US) and/or clinical conditions—pelvic pain, dyspareunia and dysmenorrhoea—were indications for pelvic/abdominal venous US. Complete US examination included renal, internal iliac and gonadal/ovarian veins. Diameters of the largest right or left pelvic veins were compared with presence of reflux. Intravaginal US was completed in 104 women, age 46 ± 11 (standard deviation) (range 25-76) years old. Pelvic symptoms were reported by 30 (29%) patients. The other patients had pelvic-related recurrent varicose veins or suspected pelvic source of lower extremity venous reflux. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and other statistics at the 90-95% level were calculated relating diameter to pelvic vein reflux. Pelvic vein reflux was detected in 54 (52%) women. Pelvic vein diameters were larger in refluxing, 8.4 ± 1.9 (5.1-14.0) mm, than in nonrefluxing veins, 5.2 ± 1.0 (3.4-8.3) mm ( P < .001 by t test). Diameters ≥6.3 mm had 91% (49/54) sensitivity and 92% (49/53) PPV. Diameters ≤6.3 mm had 94% specificity (47/50) and 89% (47/53) NPV. All veins with diameter ≥8.4 mm ( n = 21) had reflux. All veins with diameter ≤5.0 mm ( n = 27) did not have reflux. Probabilities of pelvic vein reflux were estimated based on diameters. Diameter-reflux agreement solidifies diagnosis. An explanation for contradiction between small diameter and reflux or large diameter and no reflux is recommended.