为什么仅仅简化投票程序还不够?提前投票、竞选活动和投票率

Brian T. Hamel, Jan Leighley, Robert M. Stein
{"title":"为什么仅仅简化投票程序还不够?提前投票、竞选活动和投票率","authors":"Brian T. Hamel, Jan Leighley, Robert M. Stein","doi":"10.1177/1532673x241253808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early voting laws intended to increase voter turnout seem to have had little to no effect on turnout. Why? We argue that the effects of early voting on turnout are contingent on campaigns providing citizens with information about the election, their choices, and how to vote early. When campaigns do so, turnout increases because citizens are more likely to vote – and more likely to vote early. Using individual-level panel data, we show that direct campaign contact increases turnout exclusively via the use of early voting. Using county-level data, we show that campaign ad volume also increases turnout via an increase in early voting turnout. Our results affirm our expectation that campaigns facilitate the expected mobilizing effects of early voting. At the same time, the effects of campaigns on early voting are small in magnitude, and emerge only under campaign mobilization conditions that are more the exception than the norm.","PeriodicalId":504563,"journal":{"name":"American Politics Research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Making Voting Easier Isn’t Enough: Early Voting, Campaigns, and Voter Turnout\",\"authors\":\"Brian T. Hamel, Jan Leighley, Robert M. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1532673x241253808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Early voting laws intended to increase voter turnout seem to have had little to no effect on turnout. Why? We argue that the effects of early voting on turnout are contingent on campaigns providing citizens with information about the election, their choices, and how to vote early. When campaigns do so, turnout increases because citizens are more likely to vote – and more likely to vote early. Using individual-level panel data, we show that direct campaign contact increases turnout exclusively via the use of early voting. Using county-level data, we show that campaign ad volume also increases turnout via an increase in early voting turnout. Our results affirm our expectation that campaigns facilitate the expected mobilizing effects of early voting. At the same time, the effects of campaigns on early voting are small in magnitude, and emerge only under campaign mobilization conditions that are more the exception than the norm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Politics Research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Politics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241253808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Politics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241253808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旨在提高投票率的提前投票法似乎对投票率几乎没有影响。原因何在?我们认为,提前投票对投票率的影响取决于竞选活动是否向公民提供了有关选举、选择以及如何提前投票的信息。当竞选活动这样做时,投票率就会增加,因为公民更有可能投票--而且更有可能提前投票。通过使用个人层面的面板数据,我们表明直接的竞选联系完全可以通过提前投票来提高投票率。利用县级数据,我们表明竞选广告量也会通过提高提前投票率来增加投票率。我们的结果证实了我们的预期,即竞选活动促进了提前投票的预期动员效果。同时,竞选活动对提前投票的影响程度较小,而且只有在竞选动员条件下才会出现,而这种条件更多的是例外而非常态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Making Voting Easier Isn’t Enough: Early Voting, Campaigns, and Voter Turnout
Early voting laws intended to increase voter turnout seem to have had little to no effect on turnout. Why? We argue that the effects of early voting on turnout are contingent on campaigns providing citizens with information about the election, their choices, and how to vote early. When campaigns do so, turnout increases because citizens are more likely to vote – and more likely to vote early. Using individual-level panel data, we show that direct campaign contact increases turnout exclusively via the use of early voting. Using county-level data, we show that campaign ad volume also increases turnout via an increase in early voting turnout. Our results affirm our expectation that campaigns facilitate the expected mobilizing effects of early voting. At the same time, the effects of campaigns on early voting are small in magnitude, and emerge only under campaign mobilization conditions that are more the exception than the norm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language and LGBTQ Politics: The Effect of Changing Group Labels on Public Attitudes A Thermostatic Model of Congressional Elections The Rule of Law in Red and Blue: Affective Polarization and Support for Legal Institutions in the United States Why Making Voting Easier Isn’t Enough: Early Voting, Campaigns, and Voter Turnout Oh, the Places They’ll Go: A Geographic Analysis of Gubernatorial Campaigns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1