超滤分析与传统方法相比对血液透析患者血压调节的影响

Q4 Medicine Nephro-urology Monthly Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.5812/numonthly-138699
Morteza Haghighi Enayat, H. Azami, Leili Tapak, S. Borzou, M. Gholyaf
{"title":"超滤分析与传统方法相比对血液透析患者血压调节的影响","authors":"Morteza Haghighi Enayat, H. Azami, Leili Tapak, S. Borzou, M. Gholyaf","doi":"10.5812/numonthly-138699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Standard hemodialysis sessions pose challenges for patients due to fluctuations in blood pressure. Alternative strategies, such as ultrafiltration profiling, have been proposed as potentially more effective treatments. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrafiltration profiling compared to the conventional method on blood pressure regulation among hemodialysis patients. Methods: This study employed a pre-test and post-test design, involving a single group of 30 hemodialysis patients undergoing treatment at Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan in 2022. The sampling method used was simple random sampling. The intervention consisted of three sessions using the routine method, followed by three sessions utilizing the ultrafiltration profile method, which employed an interval with a negative slope. Demographic and clinical information about the patients was recorded on a checklist. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were taken before the commencement of hemodialysis, at 1-, 2-, and 3-hour intervals post-treatment initiation, and again 15 minutes after completing hemodialysis. Results: The mean blood pressure changes observed during dialysis stages increased with both methods; however, there was a significant difference between the methods (P < 0.001). Specifically, patients receiving the ultrafiltration profile method experienced significantly lower increases in blood pressure compared to those receiving the routine method. Conclusions: Based on the research results, integrating ultrafiltration profiling into hemodialysis can be regarded as an effective and viable strategy for enhancing blood pressure regulation in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Therefore, it is recommended that this approach be considered in hemodialysis programs as well.","PeriodicalId":19466,"journal":{"name":"Nephro-urology Monthly","volume":"118 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Ultrafiltration Profiling Compared to Conventional Methods on Blood Pressure Regulation Among Hemodialysis Patients\",\"authors\":\"Morteza Haghighi Enayat, H. Azami, Leili Tapak, S. Borzou, M. Gholyaf\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/numonthly-138699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Standard hemodialysis sessions pose challenges for patients due to fluctuations in blood pressure. Alternative strategies, such as ultrafiltration profiling, have been proposed as potentially more effective treatments. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrafiltration profiling compared to the conventional method on blood pressure regulation among hemodialysis patients. Methods: This study employed a pre-test and post-test design, involving a single group of 30 hemodialysis patients undergoing treatment at Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan in 2022. The sampling method used was simple random sampling. The intervention consisted of three sessions using the routine method, followed by three sessions utilizing the ultrafiltration profile method, which employed an interval with a negative slope. Demographic and clinical information about the patients was recorded on a checklist. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were taken before the commencement of hemodialysis, at 1-, 2-, and 3-hour intervals post-treatment initiation, and again 15 minutes after completing hemodialysis. Results: The mean blood pressure changes observed during dialysis stages increased with both methods; however, there was a significant difference between the methods (P < 0.001). Specifically, patients receiving the ultrafiltration profile method experienced significantly lower increases in blood pressure compared to those receiving the routine method. Conclusions: Based on the research results, integrating ultrafiltration profiling into hemodialysis can be regarded as an effective and viable strategy for enhancing blood pressure regulation in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Therefore, it is recommended that this approach be considered in hemodialysis programs as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephro-urology Monthly\",\"volume\":\"118 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephro-urology Monthly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly-138699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephro-urology Monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly-138699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于血压波动,标准血液透析疗程给患者带来了挑战。超滤分析等替代策略被认为可能是更有效的治疗方法。研究目的本研究旨在评估超滤分析与传统方法相比对血液透析患者血压调节的影响。方法本研究采用前测和后测设计,2022 年在哈马丹 Shahid Beheshti 医院接受治疗的 30 名血液透析患者为一组。抽样方法为简单随机抽样。干预措施包括使用常规方法进行三次治疗,然后使用超滤曲线方法进行三次治疗,该方法采用负斜率间隔。患者的人口统计学和临床信息记录在检查表上。血液透析开始前、治疗开始后的 1、2 和 3 小时间隔以及血液透析结束后 15 分钟再次测量收缩压和舒张压。结果:两种方法在透析阶段观察到的平均血压变化都有所增加,但两种方法之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。具体来说,与接受常规方法的患者相比,接受超滤配置文件方法的患者血压升幅明显较低。结论:根据研究结果,在血液透析中加入超滤分析可被视为一种有效且可行的策略,可加强血液透析治疗患者的血压调节。因此,建议血液透析项目也考虑采用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Ultrafiltration Profiling Compared to Conventional Methods on Blood Pressure Regulation Among Hemodialysis Patients
Background: Standard hemodialysis sessions pose challenges for patients due to fluctuations in blood pressure. Alternative strategies, such as ultrafiltration profiling, have been proposed as potentially more effective treatments. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrafiltration profiling compared to the conventional method on blood pressure regulation among hemodialysis patients. Methods: This study employed a pre-test and post-test design, involving a single group of 30 hemodialysis patients undergoing treatment at Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan in 2022. The sampling method used was simple random sampling. The intervention consisted of three sessions using the routine method, followed by three sessions utilizing the ultrafiltration profile method, which employed an interval with a negative slope. Demographic and clinical information about the patients was recorded on a checklist. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were taken before the commencement of hemodialysis, at 1-, 2-, and 3-hour intervals post-treatment initiation, and again 15 minutes after completing hemodialysis. Results: The mean blood pressure changes observed during dialysis stages increased with both methods; however, there was a significant difference between the methods (P < 0.001). Specifically, patients receiving the ultrafiltration profile method experienced significantly lower increases in blood pressure compared to those receiving the routine method. Conclusions: Based on the research results, integrating ultrafiltration profiling into hemodialysis can be regarded as an effective and viable strategy for enhancing blood pressure regulation in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Therefore, it is recommended that this approach be considered in hemodialysis programs as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephro-urology Monthly
Nephro-urology Monthly Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Does The Serum Zinc Level Affect the Quality of Life in Dialysis Patients? A Report from Iran Normal Variations in Episodes and Duration of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Among Iranian Men: A Descriptive Analytical Study Low Intraoperative Bleeding During Laparoscopic Nephrolithotomy: A Case Report Elevated Plasma C-reactive Protein Related to Iron Overload in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients with Anemia: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study in Vietnam The Scrotal Displacement of the Catheter After Femoral Venous Cutdown: A Neonatal Case Report from Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1