在多大程度上可以实现葡萄栽培中的农药淘汰?从一个大型农场网络 10 年来的努力中汲取经验

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY OENO One Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.7885
Olivier Nefti, Nicolas Chartier, A. Merot, Thibault Peyrard, Laurent Delière
{"title":"在多大程度上可以实现葡萄栽培中的农药淘汰?从一个大型农场网络 10 年来的努力中汲取经验","authors":"Olivier Nefti, Nicolas Chartier, A. Merot, Thibault Peyrard, Laurent Delière","doi":"10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.7885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In accordance with European Directive 2009/128/CE, France has set up national policies to curb the reliance of agriculture on phytosanitary inputs. The DEPHY network is one such initiative;, which has been designed to drive, support and document the fieldwork of 3,000 farms voluntarily taking part in a collective input reduction programme. This study aimed to describe the achievements of the network’s viticultural sector, as its perennial crop is heavily reliant on pesticide applications. We chose a sample of 343 wine-growing systems across mainland France,  analysed records of their vineyard operations from before they joined the network, and compared them to those from the 2017-2020 period. We used the Treatment Frequency Index (TFI) to assess pesticide reliance together with other techno-economical parameters: production costs, workloads, greenhouse gas emissions and disease control. A significant decrease in pesticide use was found over the whole study period, with, for instance, an average TFI reduction of 24 %, which is consistent with national objectives but unmatched outside of the network. We observed an overall shift towards pesticide inputs with lower repercussions on health or the environment, as well as different TFI reduction trajectories based on initial pesticide dependency. We described the alternative practices introduced to the systems, and our results suggest that reductions in pesticide use stem from quite small and minor changes made to the cropping systems. These new practices only slightly lowered the vineyards’ technical and economical performances in specific situations involving an indepth revamping of the systems; e.g., conversion to organic viticulture. To increase pesticide phase-out, further research is needed on redesigning cropping systems, and on how to scale up the network’s results to the national level.","PeriodicalId":19510,"journal":{"name":"OENO One","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To what extent can a phase-out of pesticides in viticulture be achieved? Learning from the efforts of a large farm network after 10 years\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Nefti, Nicolas Chartier, A. Merot, Thibault Peyrard, Laurent Delière\",\"doi\":\"10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.7885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In accordance with European Directive 2009/128/CE, France has set up national policies to curb the reliance of agriculture on phytosanitary inputs. The DEPHY network is one such initiative;, which has been designed to drive, support and document the fieldwork of 3,000 farms voluntarily taking part in a collective input reduction programme. This study aimed to describe the achievements of the network’s viticultural sector, as its perennial crop is heavily reliant on pesticide applications. We chose a sample of 343 wine-growing systems across mainland France,  analysed records of their vineyard operations from before they joined the network, and compared them to those from the 2017-2020 period. We used the Treatment Frequency Index (TFI) to assess pesticide reliance together with other techno-economical parameters: production costs, workloads, greenhouse gas emissions and disease control. A significant decrease in pesticide use was found over the whole study period, with, for instance, an average TFI reduction of 24 %, which is consistent with national objectives but unmatched outside of the network. We observed an overall shift towards pesticide inputs with lower repercussions on health or the environment, as well as different TFI reduction trajectories based on initial pesticide dependency. We described the alternative practices introduced to the systems, and our results suggest that reductions in pesticide use stem from quite small and minor changes made to the cropping systems. These new practices only slightly lowered the vineyards’ technical and economical performances in specific situations involving an indepth revamping of the systems; e.g., conversion to organic viticulture. To increase pesticide phase-out, further research is needed on redesigning cropping systems, and on how to scale up the network’s results to the national level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OENO One\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OENO One\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.7885\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OENO One","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.7885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据欧盟第 2009/128/CE 号指令,法国制定了国家政策,以减少农业对植物检疫投入品的依赖。DEPHY 网络就是这样一项举措,旨在推动、支持和记录 3000 个自愿参与集体减少投入计划的农场的实地工作。本研究旨在描述该网络的葡萄种植部门所取得的成就,因为其多年生作物严重依赖农药的施用。我们在法国本土选择了 343 个葡萄种植系统作为样本,分析了他们加入网络之前的葡萄园运营记录,并与 2017-2020 年期间的记录进行了比较。我们使用处理频率指数(TFI)与其他技术经济参数(生产成本、工作量、温室气体排放和疾病控制)一起评估农药依赖性。我们发现,在整个研究期间,农药使用量大幅减少,例如,处理频率指数(TFI)平均减少了 24%,这与国家目标一致,但在该网络之外是无法比拟的。我们观察到,总体上,农药投入品向对健康或环境影响较小的方向转变,并且根据最初对农药的依赖程度,TFI 的减少轨迹也有所不同。我们介绍了这些系统所采用的替代方法,结果表明,农药使用量的减少源于对种植系统所做的微小改变。这些新做法只是在对系统进行深入改造的特定情况下,例如在转为有机葡萄栽培的情况下,略微降低了葡萄园的技术和经济效益。为了进一步淘汰农药,需要进一步研究如何重新设计种植系统,以及如何将网络的成果推广到全国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To what extent can a phase-out of pesticides in viticulture be achieved? Learning from the efforts of a large farm network after 10 years
In accordance with European Directive 2009/128/CE, France has set up national policies to curb the reliance of agriculture on phytosanitary inputs. The DEPHY network is one such initiative;, which has been designed to drive, support and document the fieldwork of 3,000 farms voluntarily taking part in a collective input reduction programme. This study aimed to describe the achievements of the network’s viticultural sector, as its perennial crop is heavily reliant on pesticide applications. We chose a sample of 343 wine-growing systems across mainland France,  analysed records of their vineyard operations from before they joined the network, and compared them to those from the 2017-2020 period. We used the Treatment Frequency Index (TFI) to assess pesticide reliance together with other techno-economical parameters: production costs, workloads, greenhouse gas emissions and disease control. A significant decrease in pesticide use was found over the whole study period, with, for instance, an average TFI reduction of 24 %, which is consistent with national objectives but unmatched outside of the network. We observed an overall shift towards pesticide inputs with lower repercussions on health or the environment, as well as different TFI reduction trajectories based on initial pesticide dependency. We described the alternative practices introduced to the systems, and our results suggest that reductions in pesticide use stem from quite small and minor changes made to the cropping systems. These new practices only slightly lowered the vineyards’ technical and economical performances in specific situations involving an indepth revamping of the systems; e.g., conversion to organic viticulture. To increase pesticide phase-out, further research is needed on redesigning cropping systems, and on how to scale up the network’s results to the national level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OENO One
OENO One Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: OENO One is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research, reviews, mini-reviews, short communications, perspectives and spotlights in the areas of viticulture, grapevine physiology, genomics and genetics, oenology, winemaking technology and processes, wine chemistry and quality, analytical chemistry, microbiology, sensory and consumer sciences, safety and health. OENO One belongs to the International Viticulture and Enology Society - IVES, an academic association dedicated to viticulture and enology.
期刊最新文献
Protection of viticultural biodiversity: genetic and phenotypic characterisation of grapevine varieties from the northwest coastal area of Tuscany (Italy) Maceration duration and grape variety: key factors in phenolic compound enrichment of Montenegrin red wine Effects of retained node numbers on berry maturity and yield components of cane-pruned Sauvignon blanc A comprehensive study on the effect of foliar mineral treatments on grapevine epiphytic microorganisms, flavonoid gene expression, and berry composition Mass Spectrometry Imaging to map metabolites in plant-microbe interactions: grapevine as a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1