干眼症问卷 5 和眼表疾病指数在评估干眼症状方面的比较分析

Bhavya Kadiri, U. Vivekanand, Sarita Lobo
{"title":"干眼症问卷 5 和眼表疾病指数在评估干眼症状方面的比较分析","authors":"Bhavya Kadiri, U. Vivekanand, Sarita Lobo","doi":"10.4103/jcor.jcor_149_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To compare the performance of the Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) questionnaire with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and check its application in large screening camps or nonclinic-based settings.\n \n \n \n Cross-sectional observation study.\n \n \n \n To evaluate the DEQ 5 questionnaire by comparing its performance to that of OSDI in assessing dry eye.\n \n \n \n A cross-sectional study comparing the performance of two questionnaires was conducted. Demographic information was collected. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability and correlation were determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.\n \n \n \n The reliability of both the DEQ 5 and OSDI was 0.52 and 0.78, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation between both questionnaires. (r = 0.6, P < 0.050).\n \n \n \n DEQ-5 questionnaire can serve as a useful tool for evaluating and monitoring in various dry eye settings in comparison to OSDI.\n","PeriodicalId":33073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 and Ocular Surface Disease Index in assessing dry eye symptoms\",\"authors\":\"Bhavya Kadiri, U. Vivekanand, Sarita Lobo\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcor.jcor_149_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To compare the performance of the Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) questionnaire with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and check its application in large screening camps or nonclinic-based settings.\\n \\n \\n \\n Cross-sectional observation study.\\n \\n \\n \\n To evaluate the DEQ 5 questionnaire by comparing its performance to that of OSDI in assessing dry eye.\\n \\n \\n \\n A cross-sectional study comparing the performance of two questionnaires was conducted. Demographic information was collected. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability and correlation were determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.\\n \\n \\n \\n The reliability of both the DEQ 5 and OSDI was 0.52 and 0.78, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation between both questionnaires. (r = 0.6, P < 0.050).\\n \\n \\n \\n DEQ-5 questionnaire can serve as a useful tool for evaluating and monitoring in various dry eye settings in comparison to OSDI.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":33073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_149_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_149_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较干眼症问卷(DEQ-5)与眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷的性能,并检查其在大型筛查营或非诊所环境中的应用。 横断面观察研究。 通过比较 DEQ 5 问卷与 OSDI 问卷在评估干眼症方面的表现,评估 DEQ 5 问卷。 进行一项横断面研究,比较两种问卷的性能。收集了人口统计学信息。使用皮尔逊相关系数确定了 Cronbach's alpha 可靠性和相关性。 DEQ 5 和 OSDI 的信度分别为 0.52 和 0.78。两份问卷之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性。(r = 0.6, P < 0.050)。 与 OSDI 相比,DEQ-5 问卷可作为在各种干眼症环境中进行评估和监测的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 and Ocular Surface Disease Index in assessing dry eye symptoms
To compare the performance of the Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) questionnaire with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and check its application in large screening camps or nonclinic-based settings. Cross-sectional observation study. To evaluate the DEQ 5 questionnaire by comparing its performance to that of OSDI in assessing dry eye. A cross-sectional study comparing the performance of two questionnaires was conducted. Demographic information was collected. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability and correlation were determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The reliability of both the DEQ 5 and OSDI was 0.52 and 0.78, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation between both questionnaires. (r = 0.6, P < 0.050). DEQ-5 questionnaire can serve as a useful tool for evaluating and monitoring in various dry eye settings in comparison to OSDI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 and Ocular Surface Disease Index in assessing dry eye symptoms Modulation transfer function and higher order aberrations with and without corneo scleral lens in an eye with keratoconus Typical cytomegalovirus retinitis in non-human immunodeficiency virus partially immunosuppressed patients: A case series To study visual evoked potential in patients with optic nerve diseases Corneal morphology following use of Malyugin versus B-hex pupil expansion rings in small pupil phacoemulsification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1