Physiologic Validation of the Compensatory Reserve Metric Obtained From Pulse Oximetry Waveforms

Background: The compensatory reserve metric (CRM) provides a novel marker of hemodynamic status in prediction of sudden cardiovascular decompensation during central hypovolemia. The CRM has previously been calculated using arterial waveforms obtained from a photoplethysmographic volume-clamp technique. However, the in-field use of pulse oximetry is becoming more prominent in research and medicine. To improve in-field applicability of the CRM, this project aimed to validate pulse-oximetry derived CRM values relative to physiologic data during simulated hemorrhage through application of lower body negative pressure (LBNP). Methods: Forty-nine healthy adults (25 females) underwent a graded LBNP protocol with the following 5-minute stages: -0, -15, -30, -45, -60, -70, -80, -90, and 100 mmHg, or until the onset of pre-syncopal symptoms (tolerance) was reached. Arterial waveforms were sampled using pulse oximetry (Massimo Radical 7). The CRM was calculated using a validated one-dimensional convolutional neural network. A brachial artery catheter was used to measure intraarterial pressure. A 3-lead ECG was used to measure heart rate. SpO2 was measured using pulse oximetry. Cardiac output and stroke volume were estimated using the photoplethysmographic volume-clamp. Data were binned for the last thirty seconds of each completed stage, and at tolerance. Fixed-effect linear mixed models with repeated measures were used to examine the association between CRM values and physiologic variables. A priori significance was set at P<0.05. Results: The median LBNP stage reached was 70 mmHg (Range: 45-100 mmHg). Relative to baseline, at tolerance there was a 50±12% ( P<0.001) mean reduction in stroke volume, 65±27% ( P<0.001) increase in heart rate, 18±8% ( P<0.001) reduction in mean arterial pressure, 21±7% ( P<0.001) systolic blood pressure, 8±9% ( P<0.001) diastolic blood pressure, and 39±12% ( P<0.001) pulse pressure. The CRM obtained using pulse oximetry was significantly associated with a reduction in stroke volume ( P<0.001), increase in heart rate ( P<0.001), and reductions in systolic ( P=0.033), diastolic ( P=0.036), and pulse pressure ( P=0.002). There was no statistically significant association between CRM and cardiac output ( P=0.421), SpO2 ( P=0.408), or mean arterial pressure ( P=0.214). Conclusion: The CRM obtained using pulse oximetry may be a valid, reliable marker of hemodynamic status with promising in-field applications. Future studies warrant investigation of feasibility and applicability within various contexts ranging from the operating room to the battlefield. The presented work was funded in part by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (Award No. DM180240) and Offce of Naval Research (Awards No. N00014-18-D-7001 and N00014-19-C-2017). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.