Jordan K. Schaefer , Josh Errickson , Xiaowen Kong , Mona A. Ali , Deborah DeCamillo , Subhash Edupuganti , Brian Haymart , Scott Kaatz , Eva Kline-Rogers , Jay H. Kozlowski , Gregory D. Krol , Suman L. Sood , James B. Froehlich , Geoffrey D. Barnes
{"title":"直接口服抗凝药联合阿司匹林与华法林联合阿司匹林的疗效对比:基于登记的队列研究","authors":"Jordan K. Schaefer , Josh Errickson , Xiaowen Kong , Mona A. Ali , Deborah DeCamillo , Subhash Edupuganti , Brian Haymart , Scott Kaatz , Eva Kline-Rogers , Jay H. Kozlowski , Gregory D. Krol , Suman L. Sood , James B. Froehlich , Geoffrey D. Barnes","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin and on aspirin (ASA) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism, it is unclear if bleeding outcomes differ.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess bleeding rates for ASA with DOACs vs warfarin and one another.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Registry-based cohort study of patients followed by a 6-center quality improvement collaborative in Michigan using data from 2009 to 2022. The study included adults on ASA with warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity matching by anticoagulant class, we compared 2 groups of 1467 patients followed for a median of 18.0 months. Any bleeding and nonmajor bleeding was increased with DOACs + ASA compared with warfarin + ASA (32.2 vs 27.8 and 27.1 vs 22.9 events/100 patient-years; relative risks [RRs], 1.1 and 1.2; 95% CIs, 1.1-1.2 and 1.1-1.3, respectively). After matching by drug, patients on apixaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (31.2 vs 27.8 events/100 patient-years; RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and nonmajor bleeding but less major bleeding (3.8 vs 4.7 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0) and emergency room visits for bleeding. Patients on rivaroxaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (39.3 vs 26.3 events/100 patient-years, RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), nonmajor bleeding, and thrombosis. Patients on apixaban + ASA vs rivaroxaban + ASA had significantly less bleeding (22.5 vs 39.3/100 patient-years; RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7), nonmajor bleeding, major bleeding (2.1 vs 5.5 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), emergency room visits for bleeding, and thrombotic events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients on DOAC + ASA without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement had more nonmajor bleeding but otherwise similar outcomes compared with warfarin + ASA. Patients treated with rivaroxaban + ASA experienced more adverse clinical events compared with warfarin + ASA or apixaban + ASA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924001389/pdfft?md5=4083a45feeb15328e9c0b6ccd63e6c6f&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924001389-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants with aspirin vs warfarin with aspirin: a registry-based cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Jordan K. Schaefer , Josh Errickson , Xiaowen Kong , Mona A. Ali , Deborah DeCamillo , Subhash Edupuganti , Brian Haymart , Scott Kaatz , Eva Kline-Rogers , Jay H. Kozlowski , Gregory D. Krol , Suman L. Sood , James B. Froehlich , Geoffrey D. Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin and on aspirin (ASA) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism, it is unclear if bleeding outcomes differ.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess bleeding rates for ASA with DOACs vs warfarin and one another.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Registry-based cohort study of patients followed by a 6-center quality improvement collaborative in Michigan using data from 2009 to 2022. The study included adults on ASA with warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity matching by anticoagulant class, we compared 2 groups of 1467 patients followed for a median of 18.0 months. Any bleeding and nonmajor bleeding was increased with DOACs + ASA compared with warfarin + ASA (32.2 vs 27.8 and 27.1 vs 22.9 events/100 patient-years; relative risks [RRs], 1.1 and 1.2; 95% CIs, 1.1-1.2 and 1.1-1.3, respectively). After matching by drug, patients on apixaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (31.2 vs 27.8 events/100 patient-years; RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and nonmajor bleeding but less major bleeding (3.8 vs 4.7 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0) and emergency room visits for bleeding. Patients on rivaroxaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (39.3 vs 26.3 events/100 patient-years, RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), nonmajor bleeding, and thrombosis. Patients on apixaban + ASA vs rivaroxaban + ASA had significantly less bleeding (22.5 vs 39.3/100 patient-years; RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7), nonmajor bleeding, major bleeding (2.1 vs 5.5 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), emergency room visits for bleeding, and thrombotic events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients on DOAC + ASA without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement had more nonmajor bleeding but otherwise similar outcomes compared with warfarin + ASA. Patients treated with rivaroxaban + ASA experienced more adverse clinical events compared with warfarin + ASA or apixaban + ASA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924001389/pdfft?md5=4083a45feeb15328e9c0b6ccd63e6c6f&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924001389-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924001389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924001389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景对于因非瓣膜性心房颤动和/或静脉血栓栓塞症而使用直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 或华法林抗凝并服用阿司匹林 (ASA) 的患者,目前尚不清楚出血结果是否存在差异。方法利用 2009 年至 2022 年的数据,对密歇根州 6 个中心质量改进协作组随访的患者进行基于登记簿的队列研究。研究对象包括因心房颤动和/或静脉血栓栓塞症而服用 ASA 与华法林或 DOACs 的成人,且近期未发生心肌梗死或心脏瓣膜置换术。结果经过抗凝剂类别倾向匹配后,我们对两组 1467 例患者进行了比较,随访时间中位数为 18.0 个月。与华法林 + ASA 相比,DOAC + ASA 会增加任何出血和非大出血的发生率(32.2 vs 27.8 和 27.1 vs 22.9 次/100 患者年;相对风险 [RRs],1.1 和 1.2;95% CIs,分别为 1.1-1.2 和 1.1-1.3)。按药物进行匹配后,阿哌沙班+ASA与华法林+ASA患者的出血量(31.2 vs 27.8次/100患者年;RR,1.1;95% CI,1.0-1.2)和非大出血次数较多,但大出血(3.8 vs 4.7次/100患者年;RR,0.8;95% CI,0.6-1.0)和因出血而去急诊就诊的次数较少。利伐沙班+ASA与华法林+ASA相比,患者的出血量(39.3 vs 26.3次/100患者年,RR,1.5;95% CI,1.3-1.6)、非大出血和血栓形成的发生率更高。阿哌沙班+ASA与利伐沙班+ASA相比,患者的出血量(22.5 vs 39.3/100患者-年;RR,0.6;95% CI,0.5-0.7)、非大出血、大出血(2.1 vs 5.5次/100患者-年;RR,0.4;95% CI,0.2-0.6)、因出血导致的急诊就诊次数(2.1 vs 5.5次/100患者-年;RR,0.4;95% CI,0.2-0.6)均显著减少。结论与华法林+ASA相比,使用DOAC+ASA且近期未发生心肌梗死或心脏瓣膜置换术的患者非大出血较多,但其他结果相似。与华法林+ASA或阿哌沙班+ASA相比,接受利伐沙班+ASA治疗的患者发生的不良临床事件更多。
Outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants with aspirin vs warfarin with aspirin: a registry-based cohort study
Background
For patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin and on aspirin (ASA) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism, it is unclear if bleeding outcomes differ.
Objectives
To assess bleeding rates for ASA with DOACs vs warfarin and one another.
Methods
Registry-based cohort study of patients followed by a 6-center quality improvement collaborative in Michigan using data from 2009 to 2022. The study included adults on ASA with warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement.
Results
After propensity matching by anticoagulant class, we compared 2 groups of 1467 patients followed for a median of 18.0 months. Any bleeding and nonmajor bleeding was increased with DOACs + ASA compared with warfarin + ASA (32.2 vs 27.8 and 27.1 vs 22.9 events/100 patient-years; relative risks [RRs], 1.1 and 1.2; 95% CIs, 1.1-1.2 and 1.1-1.3, respectively). After matching by drug, patients on apixaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (31.2 vs 27.8 events/100 patient-years; RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and nonmajor bleeding but less major bleeding (3.8 vs 4.7 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0) and emergency room visits for bleeding. Patients on rivaroxaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (39.3 vs 26.3 events/100 patient-years, RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), nonmajor bleeding, and thrombosis. Patients on apixaban + ASA vs rivaroxaban + ASA had significantly less bleeding (22.5 vs 39.3/100 patient-years; RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7), nonmajor bleeding, major bleeding (2.1 vs 5.5 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), emergency room visits for bleeding, and thrombotic events.
Conclusion
Patients on DOAC + ASA without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement had more nonmajor bleeding but otherwise similar outcomes compared with warfarin + ASA. Patients treated with rivaroxaban + ASA experienced more adverse clinical events compared with warfarin + ASA or apixaban + ASA.