2013-2020 年美国处方最多的十四种抗抑郁药的三种安全性指数

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.05.002
Zachary Poliacoff
{"title":"2013-2020 年美国处方最多的十四种抗抑郁药的三种安全性指数","authors":"Zachary Poliacoff","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study provides three prevalence-based metrics of potential harm, the fatal toxicity index (FTI), serious morbidity index (SMI) and healthcare utilization index (HUI) for fourteen of the most prescribed antidepressants in the US.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>For the years 2013–2020, adverse events for single drug exposures were obtained from the National Poison Data System. Prescription estimates were taken from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Medical Expenditure Survey. 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a Poisson distribution. Chi-square testing was used where significance was not clear.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SSRIs and SNRIs had the lowest overall indices (FTI 0.02–0.26). Bupropion's FTI (0.27–0.43) was not statistically significantly different from that of imipramine (FTI 0–1.3, <em>p</em> = .62) or nortriptyline (FTI 0.25–0.78, <em>p</em> = .22), though its SMI and HUI were significantly greater. There was a statistically significant difference in all indices between TCAs (<em>p</em> &lt; .0047). The difference between the FTI of all SSRIs did not remain significant after correction (<em>p</em> = .045).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SSRIs and SNRIs are safer than alternative agents on all measures. Bupropion exposure was as likely to cause mortality, and more likely to cause morbidity or require treatment in a healthcare facility, than TCAs nortriptyline and imipramine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three safety indices for the fourteen most prescribed antidepressants in the US, 2013–2020\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Poliacoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study provides three prevalence-based metrics of potential harm, the fatal toxicity index (FTI), serious morbidity index (SMI) and healthcare utilization index (HUI) for fourteen of the most prescribed antidepressants in the US.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>For the years 2013–2020, adverse events for single drug exposures were obtained from the National Poison Data System. Prescription estimates were taken from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Medical Expenditure Survey. 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a Poisson distribution. Chi-square testing was used where significance was not clear.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SSRIs and SNRIs had the lowest overall indices (FTI 0.02–0.26). Bupropion's FTI (0.27–0.43) was not statistically significantly different from that of imipramine (FTI 0–1.3, <em>p</em> = .62) or nortriptyline (FTI 0.25–0.78, <em>p</em> = .22), though its SMI and HUI were significantly greater. There was a statistically significant difference in all indices between TCAs (<em>p</em> &lt; .0047). The difference between the FTI of all SSRIs did not remain significant after correction (<em>p</em> = .045).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SSRIs and SNRIs are safer than alternative agents on all measures. Bupropion exposure was as likely to cause mortality, and more likely to cause morbidity or require treatment in a healthcare facility, than TCAs nortriptyline and imipramine.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324000835\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324000835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究针对美国处方量最大的 14 种抗抑郁药,提供了三种基于流行率的潜在危害指标,即致命毒性指数 (FTI)、严重发病率指数 (SMI) 和医疗保健利用率指数 (HUI)。处方估计值来自医疗保健研究与质量局的医疗支出调查。95% 置信区间采用泊松分布计算。如果显著性不明确,则采用卡方检验。安非他酮的 FTI(0.27-0.43)与丙咪嗪(FTI 0-1.3,p = 0.62)或去甲替林(FTI 0.25-0.78,p = 0.22)相比没有明显的统计学差异,但其 SMI 和 HUI 明显更高。TCAs 之间的所有指数差异均有统计学意义(p < .0047)。所有 SSRIs 的 FTI 差异经校正后仍不显著(p = .045)。与 TCAs 去甲替林和丙咪嗪相比,安非他酮暴露同样可能导致死亡,但更可能导致发病或需要在医疗机构接受治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three safety indices for the fourteen most prescribed antidepressants in the US, 2013–2020

Objective

This study provides three prevalence-based metrics of potential harm, the fatal toxicity index (FTI), serious morbidity index (SMI) and healthcare utilization index (HUI) for fourteen of the most prescribed antidepressants in the US.

Method

For the years 2013–2020, adverse events for single drug exposures were obtained from the National Poison Data System. Prescription estimates were taken from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Medical Expenditure Survey. 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a Poisson distribution. Chi-square testing was used where significance was not clear.

Results

SSRIs and SNRIs had the lowest overall indices (FTI 0.02–0.26). Bupropion's FTI (0.27–0.43) was not statistically significantly different from that of imipramine (FTI 0–1.3, p = .62) or nortriptyline (FTI 0.25–0.78, p = .22), though its SMI and HUI were significantly greater. There was a statistically significant difference in all indices between TCAs (p < .0047). The difference between the FTI of all SSRIs did not remain significant after correction (p = .045).

Conclusion

SSRIs and SNRIs are safer than alternative agents on all measures. Bupropion exposure was as likely to cause mortality, and more likely to cause morbidity or require treatment in a healthcare facility, than TCAs nortriptyline and imipramine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of reversible visual impairments and their association with the psychiatric illness severity among inpatients with psychotic disorders. Mental health effects of neurosurgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. Cancer screening among people with schizophrenia before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: Retrospective cohort study. The effects of tele-based interventions for depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A systematic review and meta-analysis Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine for patients with depression: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1