青少年自残与生活理由和希望的作用:随机对照试验的二次分析

Sarina Rain , Marissa Williams , Rachel Mitchell , Rabia Zaheer , Craig J. Bryan , Ayal Schaffer , Vera Yu Men , Neal Westreich , Janet Ellis , Benjamin I. Goldstein , Amy H. Cheung , Steven Selchen , Mark Sinyor
{"title":"青少年自残与生活理由和希望的作用:随机对照试验的二次分析","authors":"Sarina Rain ,&nbsp;Marissa Williams ,&nbsp;Rachel Mitchell ,&nbsp;Rabia Zaheer ,&nbsp;Craig J. Bryan ,&nbsp;Ayal Schaffer ,&nbsp;Vera Yu Men ,&nbsp;Neal Westreich ,&nbsp;Janet Ellis ,&nbsp;Benjamin I. Goldstein ,&nbsp;Amy H. Cheung ,&nbsp;Steven Selchen ,&nbsp;Mark Sinyor","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2024.100174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Self-harm (SH) is one of the strongest predictors of eventual death by suicide. This study examines the potential protective role of reasons for living (RFL) and hope in youth with a history of self-harm using data from a randomized control trial (RCT) of brief cognitive behavioural therapy (BCBT). A single-blind, pilot RCT examined the efficacy of BCBT for suicide prevention versus an attentional control in youth aged 15-25 admitted to hospital following self-harm. Subjects’ reasons for living and hope were measured weekly by the Reasons for Living Scale (RFL) and Adult Hope Scale (AHS), respectively, for 10 weeks of acute treatment. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate whether baseline RFL and AHS scores predicted repeat self-harm. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare median RFL and AHS scores. Our study did not find associations between reasons for living or hope and repeat self-harm in youth. Treatment with BCBT was also not associated with improved scores on either measure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000205/pdfft?md5=9b3abed08c2b7b9020b2c4c32c9357eb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772598724000205-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth self-harm and the role of reasons for living and hope: A secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sarina Rain ,&nbsp;Marissa Williams ,&nbsp;Rachel Mitchell ,&nbsp;Rabia Zaheer ,&nbsp;Craig J. Bryan ,&nbsp;Ayal Schaffer ,&nbsp;Vera Yu Men ,&nbsp;Neal Westreich ,&nbsp;Janet Ellis ,&nbsp;Benjamin I. Goldstein ,&nbsp;Amy H. Cheung ,&nbsp;Steven Selchen ,&nbsp;Mark Sinyor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psycom.2024.100174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Self-harm (SH) is one of the strongest predictors of eventual death by suicide. This study examines the potential protective role of reasons for living (RFL) and hope in youth with a history of self-harm using data from a randomized control trial (RCT) of brief cognitive behavioural therapy (BCBT). A single-blind, pilot RCT examined the efficacy of BCBT for suicide prevention versus an attentional control in youth aged 15-25 admitted to hospital following self-harm. Subjects’ reasons for living and hope were measured weekly by the Reasons for Living Scale (RFL) and Adult Hope Scale (AHS), respectively, for 10 weeks of acute treatment. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate whether baseline RFL and AHS scores predicted repeat self-harm. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare median RFL and AHS scores. Our study did not find associations between reasons for living or hope and repeat self-harm in youth. Treatment with BCBT was also not associated with improved scores on either measure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000205/pdfft?md5=9b3abed08c2b7b9020b2c4c32c9357eb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772598724000205-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自残(SH)是预测最终自杀死亡的最有力因素之一。本研究利用简短认知行为疗法(BCBT)随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,研究了生活理由(RFL)和希望对有自残史的青少年的潜在保护作用。一项单盲试验性随机对照研究考察了简短认知行为疗法(BCBT)在预防15-25岁因自残入院的青少年自杀方面的疗效。在为期10周的急性治疗中,受试者的生存理由和希望每周分别通过生存理由量表(RFL)和成人希望量表(AHS)进行测量。为评估基线 RFL 和 AHS 分数是否能预测重复自残,我们进行了逻辑回归。Mann-Whitney U 检验用于比较 RFL 和 AHS 分数的中位数。我们的研究没有发现青少年的生活理由或希望与重复自残之间存在关联。BCBT治疗也与这两项指标得分的提高无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Youth self-harm and the role of reasons for living and hope: A secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial

Self-harm (SH) is one of the strongest predictors of eventual death by suicide. This study examines the potential protective role of reasons for living (RFL) and hope in youth with a history of self-harm using data from a randomized control trial (RCT) of brief cognitive behavioural therapy (BCBT). A single-blind, pilot RCT examined the efficacy of BCBT for suicide prevention versus an attentional control in youth aged 15-25 admitted to hospital following self-harm. Subjects’ reasons for living and hope were measured weekly by the Reasons for Living Scale (RFL) and Adult Hope Scale (AHS), respectively, for 10 weeks of acute treatment. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate whether baseline RFL and AHS scores predicted repeat self-harm. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare median RFL and AHS scores. Our study did not find associations between reasons for living or hope and repeat self-harm in youth. Treatment with BCBT was also not associated with improved scores on either measure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and food addiction: The role of urgency and emotion dysregulation Factors related to painful somatic symptoms in patients with depression: The role of gender and anhedonia rtfMRI neurofeedback interventions are not cost prohibitive The impact of childhood sexual, physical and emotional abuse and neglect on suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review of meta-analyses Convergent and predictive validity of the Mini MoCA and considerations for use among older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1