利用 A2 滴度进行 A2/A2B 死体供肾移植可提高肾移植的可及性:单中心研究

IF 3.4 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843
Erik L. Lum , Afshin Pirzadeh , Nakul Datta , Gerald S. Lipshutz , Andrea M. McGonigle , Anum Hamiduzzaman , Natalie Bjelajac , Bethany Hale-Durbin , Suphamai Bunnapradist
{"title":"利用 A2 滴度进行 A2/A2B 死体供肾移植可提高肾移植的可及性:单中心研究","authors":"Erik L. Lum ,&nbsp;Afshin Pirzadeh ,&nbsp;Nakul Datta ,&nbsp;Gerald S. Lipshutz ,&nbsp;Andrea M. McGonigle ,&nbsp;Anum Hamiduzzaman ,&nbsp;Natalie Bjelajac ,&nbsp;Bethany Hale-Durbin ,&nbsp;Suphamai Bunnapradist","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of<!--> <!-->≤1:8 for IgG and<!--> <!-->≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ<sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 7","pages":"Article 100843"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542/pdfft?md5=92f55a86a71fc81898e1dda383ac65f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000542-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A2/A2B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Using A2 Titers Improves Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Study\",\"authors\":\"Erik L. Lum ,&nbsp;Afshin Pirzadeh ,&nbsp;Nakul Datta ,&nbsp;Gerald S. Lipshutz ,&nbsp;Andrea M. McGonigle ,&nbsp;Anum Hamiduzzaman ,&nbsp;Natalie Bjelajac ,&nbsp;Bethany Hale-Durbin ,&nbsp;Suphamai Bunnapradist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of<!--> <!-->≤1:8 for IgG and<!--> <!-->≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ<sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 100843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542/pdfft?md5=92f55a86a71fc81898e1dda383ac65f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000542-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由& 目标2014年,A2/A2B已故捐献者肾移植选项被纳入肾脏分配系统,以改善B血型候选者的机会。尽管报告的结果很好,但全美中心的接受率仍然很低。在此,我们研究了在单个中心实施A2/A2B方案(IgG滴度≤1:8,IgM滴度≤1:16)对B血型肾移植受者的影响。设置&amp;参与者2019年1月1日至2022年12月期间,在单一中心接受已故供体肾移植的B型血受者.暴露根据供体血型对已故供体肾移植受者进行分析,比较A2/A2B与血型相合的受者。结果一年患者存活率、死亡删减后的同种异体移植功能、原发性无功能、延迟移植功能、使用血清肌酐水平衡量的同种异体移植功能和一年肾小球滤过率、活检证实的排斥反应以及浆液分离需求。分析方法A2/A2B组与相合组之间的比较采用Fisher检验或χ2检验进行分类变量分析,采用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验进行连续变量分析。结果在研究期间,共有104名B型血患者在本中心接受了死体肾移植,其中49人(47.1%)接受了A2/A2B移植。与血型匹配的受者相比,A2/A2B 受者的等待时间较短(57.9 个月 vs 74.7 个月,P = 0.01)。A2/A2B受者更有可能在心脏死亡后接受供体(24.5% vs 1.8%,P <0.05),并经历移植功能延迟(65.3% vs 41.8%)。在肾移植后1个月、3个月和1年的平均血清肌酐水平或估计肾小球滤过率、急性排斥反应或原发性无功能方面没有观察到差异。结论实施 A2/A2B 方案后,B 血型等待者的移植量增加了 83.6%,移植等待时间缩短了 22.5%,移植结果相似。在美国,B 型血患者等待肾移植的时间最长。少数族裔在 B 型血等待者中占很大比例,这也是肾移植率存在种族差异的原因之一。在这项研究中,接受 A2/A2B 血型不相容的肾脏与接受血型相容的肾脏相比,接受肾移植的时间几乎提前了 18 个月。接受 A2/A2B 肾脏的结果没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A2/A2B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Using A2 Titers Improves Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Study

Rationale & Objective

The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of ≤1:8 for IgG and ≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.

Study Design

Retrospective observational study.

Setting & Participants

Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.

Exposure

Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.

Outcomes

One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.

Analytical Approach

Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ2 test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, P = 0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, P < 0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.

Limitations

Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.

Conclusions

Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.

Plain-Language Summary

Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Concordance Analysis Between KDIGO Definition of Acute Kidney Injury and Its Coding in Clinical Practice Patients’ Perceptions of Kidney Transplant Failure and Return to Dialysis IgA-Dominant Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis Due to Mycobacterium avium: A Case Report Clinical Features and Outcomes of Recurrent IgA Nephropathy After Transplantation: A Case Series and Comparison to Native Disease First Description of Nonlupus Full-House Nephropathy in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Responsive to High-Dose Tocilizumab
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1