患者和医务人员对虚弱概念及其在老年肺癌患者治疗评估和决策中的作用的看法。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING European Journal of Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102611
Clare Warnock , Janet Ulman , Julie Skilbeck , Angela Tod
{"title":"患者和医务人员对虚弱概念及其在老年肺癌患者治疗评估和决策中的作用的看法。","authors":"Clare Warnock ,&nbsp;Janet Ulman ,&nbsp;Julie Skilbeck ,&nbsp;Angela Tod","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Frailty influences outcomes in patients with cancer and should be considered when making decisions about treatment but concerns have been raised about possible negative consequences of doing this. Many patients with lung cancer have attributes of frailty and this study explores patient and staff perspectives on its role in decision making in older people with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study adopted a two-phase qualitative approach using semi-structured telephone interviews and an in-person focus group. Data was analysed using framework techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three key themes were identified: describing frailty, assessing frailty and perceptions of frailty. Each presented opportunities and challenges for using frailty in the context of treatment decision making. Frailty was described in relation to diverse attributes which made it difficult to define and assess. It was also associated with negative connotations, particularly by patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Frailty has the potential to inform decision making that balances the wish to provide optimum treatment against risks to patients who may not be able to tolerate it. The challenge for healthcare staff is to incorporate frailty assessment into clinical practice in a way that is acceptable to patients and avoids potential unintended harms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and staff perspectives on the concept of frailty and its role in assessment and decision making in treatment for older people with lung cancer\",\"authors\":\"Clare Warnock ,&nbsp;Janet Ulman ,&nbsp;Julie Skilbeck ,&nbsp;Angela Tod\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Frailty influences outcomes in patients with cancer and should be considered when making decisions about treatment but concerns have been raised about possible negative consequences of doing this. Many patients with lung cancer have attributes of frailty and this study explores patient and staff perspectives on its role in decision making in older people with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study adopted a two-phase qualitative approach using semi-structured telephone interviews and an in-person focus group. Data was analysed using framework techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three key themes were identified: describing frailty, assessing frailty and perceptions of frailty. Each presented opportunities and challenges for using frailty in the context of treatment decision making. Frailty was described in relation to diverse attributes which made it difficult to define and assess. It was also associated with negative connotations, particularly by patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Frailty has the potential to inform decision making that balances the wish to provide optimum treatment against risks to patients who may not be able to tolerate it. The challenge for healthcare staff is to incorporate frailty assessment into clinical practice in a way that is acceptable to patients and avoids potential unintended harms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的体弱会影响癌症患者的预后,因此在做出治疗决定时应考虑到这一点,但有人担心这样做可能会产生负面影响。许多肺癌患者都有体弱的特征,本研究探讨了患者和医务人员对体弱在老年肺癌患者决策中的作用的看法。方法本研究采用半结构化电话访谈和面对面焦点小组的两阶段定性方法。结果确定了三个关键主题:描述虚弱、评估虚弱和对虚弱的看法。每个主题都提出了在治疗决策中使用虚弱的机遇和挑战。对虚弱的描述涉及多种属性,因此很难对其进行定义和评估。结论虚弱有可能为决策制定提供依据,从而在提供最佳治疗的愿望与可能无法耐受治疗的患者所面临的风险之间取得平衡。医护人员面临的挑战是如何将虚弱评估纳入临床实践,使患者能够接受,并避免潜在的意外伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient and staff perspectives on the concept of frailty and its role in assessment and decision making in treatment for older people with lung cancer

Purpose

Frailty influences outcomes in patients with cancer and should be considered when making decisions about treatment but concerns have been raised about possible negative consequences of doing this. Many patients with lung cancer have attributes of frailty and this study explores patient and staff perspectives on its role in decision making in older people with lung cancer.

Methods

The study adopted a two-phase qualitative approach using semi-structured telephone interviews and an in-person focus group. Data was analysed using framework techniques.

Results

Three key themes were identified: describing frailty, assessing frailty and perceptions of frailty. Each presented opportunities and challenges for using frailty in the context of treatment decision making. Frailty was described in relation to diverse attributes which made it difficult to define and assess. It was also associated with negative connotations, particularly by patients.

Conclusion

Frailty has the potential to inform decision making that balances the wish to provide optimum treatment against risks to patients who may not be able to tolerate it. The challenge for healthcare staff is to incorporate frailty assessment into clinical practice in a way that is acceptable to patients and avoids potential unintended harms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
期刊最新文献
The effect of using virtual reality goggles on psychological well-being and care burden of informal caregivers of patients hospitalized in a palliative care clinic Effect of an integrated narrative program (INP) on quality of life among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An experimental trial Effect of training based on Orem's self-care deficit theory on breast cancer patients' management of chemotherapy-related side effects and self-care behaviors: A randomized controlled trial Effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1