沃尔多在哪里?量化营销应用中隐私与效用权衡的框架

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Research in Marketing Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.05.003
{"title":"沃尔多在哪里?量化营销应用中隐私与效用权衡的框架","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Firms can rely on various data protection methods to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation’s (GDPR) anonymization directive. We develop a privacy attack to estimate customers’ privacy risk and find that data protection methods commonly used in practice do not offer a reliable guarantee of privacy protection.<!--> <!-->We therefore develop a framework that describes the use of deep learning to generate synthetic data that are both (differentially) private, and useful for marketing analysts. Empirically, we apply our framework to two privacy-sensitive marketing applications in which an analyst is faced with everyday managerial practices. In contrast to GDPR’s directive to minimize data collection, we show that customers’ privacy risk can be reduced by blending into a large crowd: a “Where’s Waldo” effect. Our framework provides a data protection method with a formal privacy guarantee and allows analysts to quantify, control, and communicate privacy risk levels with stakeholders, draw meaningful insights, and share data even under privacy regulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"41 3","pages":"Pages 529-546"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000417/pdfft?md5=d465a52bb9b3ac66aa6929524a8887d0&pid=1-s2.0-S0167811624000417-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where’s Waldo? A framework for quantifying the privacy-utility trade-off in marketing applications\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Firms can rely on various data protection methods to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation’s (GDPR) anonymization directive. We develop a privacy attack to estimate customers’ privacy risk and find that data protection methods commonly used in practice do not offer a reliable guarantee of privacy protection.<!--> <!-->We therefore develop a framework that describes the use of deep learning to generate synthetic data that are both (differentially) private, and useful for marketing analysts. Empirically, we apply our framework to two privacy-sensitive marketing applications in which an analyst is faced with everyday managerial practices. In contrast to GDPR’s directive to minimize data collection, we show that customers’ privacy risk can be reduced by blending into a large crowd: a “Where’s Waldo” effect. Our framework provides a data protection method with a formal privacy guarantee and allows analysts to quantify, control, and communicate privacy risk levels with stakeholders, draw meaningful insights, and share data even under privacy regulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 529-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000417/pdfft?md5=d465a52bb9b3ac66aa6929524a8887d0&pid=1-s2.0-S0167811624000417-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000417\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业可以依靠各种数据保护方法来遵守《一般数据保护条例》(GDPR)的匿名化指令。我们开发了一种隐私攻击来估计客户的隐私风险,并发现实际中常用的数据保护方法并不能提供可靠的隐私保护保证。因此,我们开发了一个框架,描述了如何利用深度学习生成既(有区别地)保护隐私又对营销分析师有用的合成数据。在实证方面,我们将我们的框架应用于两个隐私敏感的营销应用中,在这两个应用中,分析师面临着日常的管理实践。与 GDPR 关于尽量减少数据收集的指令相反,我们表明,客户的隐私风险可以通过融入人群来降低:这就是 "Where's Waldo "效应。我们的框架提供了一种具有正式隐私保证的数据保护方法,使分析人员能够量化、控制隐私风险水平,并与利益相关者进行沟通,得出有意义的见解,并在符合隐私法规的情况下共享数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where’s Waldo? A framework for quantifying the privacy-utility trade-off in marketing applications

Firms can rely on various data protection methods to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation’s (GDPR) anonymization directive. We develop a privacy attack to estimate customers’ privacy risk and find that data protection methods commonly used in practice do not offer a reliable guarantee of privacy protection. We therefore develop a framework that describes the use of deep learning to generate synthetic data that are both (differentially) private, and useful for marketing analysts. Empirically, we apply our framework to two privacy-sensitive marketing applications in which an analyst is faced with everyday managerial practices. In contrast to GDPR’s directive to minimize data collection, we show that customers’ privacy risk can be reduced by blending into a large crowd: a “Where’s Waldo” effect. Our framework provides a data protection method with a formal privacy guarantee and allows analysts to quantify, control, and communicate privacy risk levels with stakeholders, draw meaningful insights, and share data even under privacy regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research in Marketing is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal for marketing academics and practitioners. Building on a great tradition of global marketing scholarship, IJRM aims to contribute substantially to the field of marketing research by providing a high-quality medium for the dissemination of new marketing knowledge and methods. Among IJRM targeted audience are marketing scholars, practitioners (e.g., marketing research and consulting professionals) and other interested groups and individuals.
期刊最新文献
Gender and racial price disparities in the NFT marketplace Online reviews: A literature review and roadmap for future research A method for measuring consumer confusion due to lookalike labels Editorial Board Strange Case of Dr. Bidder and Mr. Entrant: Consumer Preference Inconsistencies in Costly Price Offers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1