通过皮肤内科学治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的新策略:ELOCS II 期随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.009
{"title":"通过皮肤内科学治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的新策略:ELOCS II 期随机对照试验。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>: This phase II trial sought to be the first of its kind to estimate the success rate of endermology in reducing breast cancer-related lymphedema.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>ELOCS is a French, monocentric, randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients were randomized to receive the following over a 5-day treatment period: standard intensive decongestant treatment (IDT) (bandages and manual lymphatic drainage MLD) (group 1); IDT including bandages, MLD, and Cellu M6 (group 2); and IDT including bandages and Cellu M6 (Group 3). The main endpoint was the success rate in each group, (reduction of at least 30% in the excess volume). We estimated that endermology treatment (groups 2 and 3) would be of interest successes occurred in at least 21 out of 31 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 93 patients were included (31 patients in each of the 3 groups). The median age was 64.5 years (IQR: [56.4-71.3]). Patients were treated with mastectomy (n = 35), axillary lymphadenectomy (n = 80), radiotherapy (n = 91), and chemotherapy (n = 68). The mean relative reduction in excess volume was 38% in group 1, 33% in group 2, and 34% in group 3. Success rate was 58.1% in group 1 (18/31, <em>P</em> = ,0237), 51.6% (16/31, <em>P</em> = ,5) in group 2, and 64.5% (20/31, <em>P</em> = ,075) in group 3. In the LPG groups (<span><span>2</span></span> and <span><span>3</span></span>), 10/62 (16%) patients found LPG painful and 9/62 (15%) patients considered it to be unpleasant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even though the critical threshold of 21 successes was not met, this study was the first to validate a standardized and reproducible endermology protocol.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 533-540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Strategy for Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Treatment by Endermology: ELOCS Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>: This phase II trial sought to be the first of its kind to estimate the success rate of endermology in reducing breast cancer-related lymphedema.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>ELOCS is a French, monocentric, randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients were randomized to receive the following over a 5-day treatment period: standard intensive decongestant treatment (IDT) (bandages and manual lymphatic drainage MLD) (group 1); IDT including bandages, MLD, and Cellu M6 (group 2); and IDT including bandages and Cellu M6 (Group 3). The main endpoint was the success rate in each group, (reduction of at least 30% in the excess volume). We estimated that endermology treatment (groups 2 and 3) would be of interest successes occurred in at least 21 out of 31 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 93 patients were included (31 patients in each of the 3 groups). The median age was 64.5 years (IQR: [56.4-71.3]). Patients were treated with mastectomy (n = 35), axillary lymphadenectomy (n = 80), radiotherapy (n = 91), and chemotherapy (n = 68). The mean relative reduction in excess volume was 38% in group 1, 33% in group 2, and 34% in group 3. Success rate was 58.1% in group 1 (18/31, <em>P</em> = ,0237), 51.6% (16/31, <em>P</em> = ,5) in group 2, and 64.5% (20/31, <em>P</em> = ,075) in group 3. In the LPG groups (<span><span>2</span></span> and <span><span>3</span></span>), 10/62 (16%) patients found LPG painful and 9/62 (15%) patients considered it to be unpleasant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even though the critical threshold of 21 successes was not met, this study was the first to validate a standardized and reproducible endermology protocol.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 533-540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924001228\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924001228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项II期试验旨在首次评估皮肤内治疗法在减轻乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿方面的成功率。患者在为期 5 天的治疗期间随机接受以下治疗:标准强化减充血治疗(IDT)(绷带和人工淋巴引流术)(第 1 组);IDT(包括绷带、人工淋巴引流术和 Cellu M6)(第 2 组);IDT(包括绷带和 Cellu M6)(第 3 组)。主要终点是各组的成功率(多余体积至少减少 30%)。我们估计内皮治疗(第 2 组和第 3 组)在 31 名患者中至少有 21 名成功。中位年龄为 64.5 岁(IQR:[56.4-71.3])。患者接受了乳房切除术(35 例)、腋窝淋巴结切除术(80 例)、放疗(91 例)和化疗(68 例)。第一组的成功率为 58.1%(18/31,P = ,0237),第二组为 51.6%(16/31,P = ,5),第三组为 64.5%(20/31,P = ,075)。在 LPG 组(第 2 组和第 3 组)中,10/62(16%)名患者认为 LPG 很痛苦,9/62(15%)名患者认为 LPG 不愉快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Strategy for Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Treatment by Endermology: ELOCS Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

: This phase II trial sought to be the first of its kind to estimate the success rate of endermology in reducing breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Patients and Methods

ELOCS is a French, monocentric, randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients were randomized to receive the following over a 5-day treatment period: standard intensive decongestant treatment (IDT) (bandages and manual lymphatic drainage MLD) (group 1); IDT including bandages, MLD, and Cellu M6 (group 2); and IDT including bandages and Cellu M6 (Group 3). The main endpoint was the success rate in each group, (reduction of at least 30% in the excess volume). We estimated that endermology treatment (groups 2 and 3) would be of interest successes occurred in at least 21 out of 31 patients.

Results

A total of 93 patients were included (31 patients in each of the 3 groups). The median age was 64.5 years (IQR: [56.4-71.3]). Patients were treated with mastectomy (n = 35), axillary lymphadenectomy (n = 80), radiotherapy (n = 91), and chemotherapy (n = 68). The mean relative reduction in excess volume was 38% in group 1, 33% in group 2, and 34% in group 3. Success rate was 58.1% in group 1 (18/31, P = ,0237), 51.6% (16/31, P = ,5) in group 2, and 64.5% (20/31, P = ,075) in group 3. In the LPG groups (2 and 3), 10/62 (16%) patients found LPG painful and 9/62 (15%) patients considered it to be unpleasant.

Conclusion

Even though the critical threshold of 21 successes was not met, this study was the first to validate a standardized and reproducible endermology protocol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Another Biosignature for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ-Have We Moved the Needle? Development and Validation of a Novel Conditional Survival Nomogram for Predicting Real-Time Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis. Association of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Muscle Quality at Diagnosis With Survival in Young Women With Breast Cancer: Retrospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1