患者对在中心内血液透析期间使用远程医疗的看法:定性研究

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100848
Trenton M. Haltom , Susie Q. Lew , Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer , Glenn M. Chertow , Allison Jaure , Kevin F. Erickson
{"title":"患者对在中心内血液透析期间使用远程医疗的看法:定性研究","authors":"Trenton M. Haltom ,&nbsp;Susie Q. Lew ,&nbsp;Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer ,&nbsp;Glenn M. Chertow ,&nbsp;Allison Jaure ,&nbsp;Kevin F. Erickson","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States federal government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology practitioners across the United States could replace face-to-face visits with telemedicine for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. This study describes patients’ perspectives on the use of telemedicine during in-center hemodialysis.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>A qualitative study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color) receiving in-center hemodialysis who used telemedicine with their nephrologist during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Telephone semistructured interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 6 themes with subthemes: adapting to telemedicine (gaining familiarity and confidence, overcoming and resolving technical difficulties, and relying on staff for communication); ensuring availability of the physician (enabling an immediate response to urgent medical needs, providing peace of mind, addressing patient needs adequately, and enhanced attention and contact from physicians); safeguarding against infection (limiting COVID-19 exposures and decreasing use); straining communication and physical interactions (loss of personalized touch, limited physical examination, and unable to reapproach physicians about forgotten issues); maintaining privacy (enhancing privacy and projecting voice enables others to hear); and supporting confidence in telemedicine (requiring established rapport with physicians, clinical stabilty of health, and ability to have in-person visits when necessary).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Interviews were conducted later in the pandemic when some nephrology care providers were using telemedicine infrequently.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>This study describes patients’ perspectives on the use of telemedicine while receiving in-center hemodialysis during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Data are derived from semistructured interviews with thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color). We identified 6 major themes including adapting to telemedicine, ensuring availability of the physicians, safeguarding against infection, straining communication and physical interactions, maintaining privacy, and supporting confidence in telemedicine. These findings suggest that patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000591/pdfft?md5=a161a97b18cb55c54ea28c2abe723fe2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000591-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Trenton M. Haltom ,&nbsp;Susie Q. Lew ,&nbsp;Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer ,&nbsp;Glenn M. Chertow ,&nbsp;Allison Jaure ,&nbsp;Kevin F. Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States federal government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology practitioners across the United States could replace face-to-face visits with telemedicine for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. This study describes patients’ perspectives on the use of telemedicine during in-center hemodialysis.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>A qualitative study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color) receiving in-center hemodialysis who used telemedicine with their nephrologist during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Telephone semistructured interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 6 themes with subthemes: adapting to telemedicine (gaining familiarity and confidence, overcoming and resolving technical difficulties, and relying on staff for communication); ensuring availability of the physician (enabling an immediate response to urgent medical needs, providing peace of mind, addressing patient needs adequately, and enhanced attention and contact from physicians); safeguarding against infection (limiting COVID-19 exposures and decreasing use); straining communication and physical interactions (loss of personalized touch, limited physical examination, and unable to reapproach physicians about forgotten issues); maintaining privacy (enhancing privacy and projecting voice enables others to hear); and supporting confidence in telemedicine (requiring established rapport with physicians, clinical stabilty of health, and ability to have in-person visits when necessary).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Interviews were conducted later in the pandemic when some nephrology care providers were using telemedicine infrequently.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>This study describes patients’ perspectives on the use of telemedicine while receiving in-center hemodialysis during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Data are derived from semistructured interviews with thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color). We identified 6 major themes including adapting to telemedicine, ensuring availability of the physicians, safeguarding against infection, straining communication and physical interactions, maintaining privacy, and supporting confidence in telemedicine. These findings suggest that patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000591/pdfft?md5=a161a97b18cb55c54ea28c2abe723fe2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000591-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由与目标在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之后,美国联邦政府扩大了远程医疗站点的范围,将门诊透析单位也包括在内。美国各地的肾脏病医生首次可以用远程医疗取代面对面的访问,为接受中心内血液透析的患者提供服务。本研究描述了患者对在中心内血液透析过程中使用远程医疗的看法。研究设计定性研究。研究地点& 参与者32名来自服务不足人群(年龄较大、受教育程度较低、失业、有色人种)的接受中心内血液透析的患者,他们在COVID-19大流行期间与他们的肾病医生使用了远程医疗。对访谈记录进行了主题分析。结果我们确定了 6 个主题及次主题:适应远程医疗(获得熟悉感和信心、克服和解决技术困难、依靠工作人员进行交流);确保医生的可用性(能够立即响应紧急医疗需求、提供安心、充分满足患者需求、加强医生的关注和联系);防止感染(限制 COVID-19 暴露和减少使用);限制交流和身体互动(失去个性化接触、身体检查受限、无法就遗忘的问题再次与医生联系);维护隐私(增强隐私性、投射声音使他人能够听到);支持对远程医疗的信心(要求与医生建立良好关系、临床健康状况稳定、必要时能够亲自就诊)。结论在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,接受中心内血液透析的患者适应了肾科医生的远程医疗访问,并观察到了其益处。不过,还需要进一步考虑沟通、隐私和身体评估等问题。采用混合方法将远程医疗整合到未来的中心内血液透析护理中,有可能建立信任、优化沟通并加强护理。这项研究描述了患者在冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)大流行期间接受中心内血液透析时使用远程医疗的观点。数据来源于对 32 名来自服务不足人群(年龄较大、教育程度较低、失业、有色人种)的患者进行的半结构式访谈。我们确定了 6 大主题,包括适应远程医疗、确保医生的可用性、防止感染、紧张的沟通和身体互动、维护隐私以及支持对远程医疗的信心。这些研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,接受中心内血液透析的患者适应了肾科医生的远程医疗访问,并观察到了其益处。不过,还需要进一步考虑沟通、隐私和身体评估等问题。采用混合方法将远程医疗整合到未来的中心内血液透析护理中,有可能建立信任、优化沟通并加强护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study

Rationale & Objective

In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States federal government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology practitioners across the United States could replace face-to-face visits with telemedicine for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. This study describes patients’ perspectives on the use of telemedicine during in-center hemodialysis.

Study Design

A qualitative study.

Setting & Participants

Thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color) receiving in-center hemodialysis who used telemedicine with their nephrologist during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Analytical Approach

Telephone semistructured interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.

Results

We identified 6 themes with subthemes: adapting to telemedicine (gaining familiarity and confidence, overcoming and resolving technical difficulties, and relying on staff for communication); ensuring availability of the physician (enabling an immediate response to urgent medical needs, providing peace of mind, addressing patient needs adequately, and enhanced attention and contact from physicians); safeguarding against infection (limiting COVID-19 exposures and decreasing use); straining communication and physical interactions (loss of personalized touch, limited physical examination, and unable to reapproach physicians about forgotten issues); maintaining privacy (enhancing privacy and projecting voice enables others to hear); and supporting confidence in telemedicine (requiring established rapport with physicians, clinical stabilty of health, and ability to have in-person visits when necessary).

Limitations

Interviews were conducted later in the pandemic when some nephrology care providers were using telemedicine infrequently.

Conclusions

Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.

Plain-Language Summary

This study describes patients’ perspectives on the use of telemedicine while receiving in-center hemodialysis during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Data are derived from semistructured interviews with thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color). We identified 6 major themes including adapting to telemedicine, ensuring availability of the physicians, safeguarding against infection, straining communication and physical interactions, maintaining privacy, and supporting confidence in telemedicine. These findings suggest that patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Living Donor Candidates’ Self-reported Health and Health Perceptions and Completion of Donor Evaluation: A Cohort Study Undetected Air Embolism During Hemodialysis from a Defective Central Venous Catheter Causing Intradialytic Cardiac Arrest: An Imaging Teaching Case The Surprise Question in Hemodialysis, Frailty, Nutrition, Patient-reported Quality of Life, and All-Cause Mortality: The Osaka Dialysis Complication Study (ODCS) Antihypertensive Treatment Patterns in CKD Stages 3 and 4: The CKD-REIN Cohort Study Advanced CKD of Uncertain Etiology Among Children in Guatemala: Genetic and Clinical Characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1