急诊科中的攻击与暴力:探索一线医护人员观点的定性研究

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2024.04.003
Joshua Johnson , Sara Hansen , Luke Hopper , Luke Brook , Jessica Watson , Brennen Mills
{"title":"急诊科中的攻击与暴力:探索一线医护人员观点的定性研究","authors":"Joshua Johnson ,&nbsp;Sara Hansen ,&nbsp;Luke Hopper ,&nbsp;Luke Brook ,&nbsp;Jessica Watson ,&nbsp;Brennen Mills","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aggression and violence (AV) towards frontline healthcare professionals (FHPs) represent a rapidly increasing strain on hospitals, impacting clinician mental health and the provision of patient care. Little is known about the perceptions of healthcare professionals on current aggression management practices.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of FHPs on AV in hospital emergency departments (EDs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight semi-structured focus groups consisting of 6–10 participants from five hospital EDs were held. Participants included medical doctors, nurses, and work health safety staff. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed before undergoing thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Four main themes were identified: (i) workplace AV in healthcare are increasing in frequency and difficulty to manage, (ii) local strategies in place to manage workplace AV are perceived to be insufficient, (iii) systemic issues exacerbate the consequences of workplace AV, and (iv) staff feel inadequately equipped to manage the impact of workplace AV on their own well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>There are substantial perceived barriers to the effective management of workplace aggressive and violent behaviour within Australian hospital EDs. Participants suggest perceived increases in the prevalence of aggressive incidents and systemic issues surrounding incident reporting and follow-up exacerbate existing deficiencies in workplace AV management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Further research into risk reduction strategies, investigation of targeted interventions to better prepare staff, and improved reporting processes and pathways are needed to mitigate fallout of workplace exposures to AV in the ED.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 195-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000179/pdfft?md5=dde07a8549e39ac73b967d7c0eb2297e&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000179-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aggression and violence in the emergency department: A qualitative study exploring the perspectives of frontline healthcare professionals\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Johnson ,&nbsp;Sara Hansen ,&nbsp;Luke Hopper ,&nbsp;Luke Brook ,&nbsp;Jessica Watson ,&nbsp;Brennen Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aggression and violence (AV) towards frontline healthcare professionals (FHPs) represent a rapidly increasing strain on hospitals, impacting clinician mental health and the provision of patient care. Little is known about the perceptions of healthcare professionals on current aggression management practices.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of FHPs on AV in hospital emergency departments (EDs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight semi-structured focus groups consisting of 6–10 participants from five hospital EDs were held. Participants included medical doctors, nurses, and work health safety staff. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed before undergoing thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Four main themes were identified: (i) workplace AV in healthcare are increasing in frequency and difficulty to manage, (ii) local strategies in place to manage workplace AV are perceived to be insufficient, (iii) systemic issues exacerbate the consequences of workplace AV, and (iv) staff feel inadequately equipped to manage the impact of workplace AV on their own well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>There are substantial perceived barriers to the effective management of workplace aggressive and violent behaviour within Australian hospital EDs. Participants suggest perceived increases in the prevalence of aggressive incidents and systemic issues surrounding incident reporting and follow-up exacerbate existing deficiencies in workplace AV management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Further research into risk reduction strategies, investigation of targeted interventions to better prepare staff, and improved reporting processes and pathways are needed to mitigate fallout of workplace exposures to AV in the ED.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 195-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000179/pdfft?md5=dde07a8549e39ac73b967d7c0eb2297e&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000179-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对一线医护人员(FHPs)的侵犯和暴力(AV)是医院面临的一个迅速增加的压力,影响了临床医生的心理健康和对病人的护理。本研究旨在调查前线医护人员对医院急诊科(EDs)中侵犯和暴力事件的看法。研究方法在五家医院急诊科开展了八个半结构式焦点小组,每个小组由 6-10 人组成。参与者包括医生、护士和工作健康安全人员。对焦点小组进行了录音和转录,然后进行了主题分析:(讨论在澳大利亚医院急诊室内,有效管理工作场所攻击性和暴力行为存在巨大障碍。结论需要进一步研究降低风险的策略,调查有针对性的干预措施,使员工做好更充分的准备,并改进报告流程和途径,以减轻急诊室工作场所暴露于暴力的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aggression and violence in the emergency department: A qualitative study exploring the perspectives of frontline healthcare professionals

Background

Aggression and violence (AV) towards frontline healthcare professionals (FHPs) represent a rapidly increasing strain on hospitals, impacting clinician mental health and the provision of patient care. Little is known about the perceptions of healthcare professionals on current aggression management practices.

Aim

This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of FHPs on AV in hospital emergency departments (EDs).

Methods

Eight semi-structured focus groups consisting of 6–10 participants from five hospital EDs were held. Participants included medical doctors, nurses, and work health safety staff. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed before undergoing thematic analysis.

Findings

Four main themes were identified: (i) workplace AV in healthcare are increasing in frequency and difficulty to manage, (ii) local strategies in place to manage workplace AV are perceived to be insufficient, (iii) systemic issues exacerbate the consequences of workplace AV, and (iv) staff feel inadequately equipped to manage the impact of workplace AV on their own well-being.

Discussion

There are substantial perceived barriers to the effective management of workplace aggressive and violent behaviour within Australian hospital EDs. Participants suggest perceived increases in the prevalence of aggressive incidents and systemic issues surrounding incident reporting and follow-up exacerbate existing deficiencies in workplace AV management.

Conclusion

Further research into risk reduction strategies, investigation of targeted interventions to better prepare staff, and improved reporting processes and pathways are needed to mitigate fallout of workplace exposures to AV in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Staff perceptions of the potential for nurses to address service gaps within a homeless health service in Sydney, Australia: Results of a cross-sectional survey Workplace violence against nurses in rural governmental hospitals in Jordan Implementation of evidence-based practice in paediatric nursing care: Facilitators and barriers Weaning small babies from incubator to cot: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1