{"title":"拒绝战斗:质疑《Pall Mall Gazette》中的科学权威","authors":"Barbara D. Ferguson","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>When the <i>Pall Mall Gazette</i> published an editorial about the fraud case brought against spiritualist medium D. D. Home in May 1868, the editor likely anticipated letters about the legitimacy of spiritualism—a topic of considerable media attention. Instead, he received multiple letters scrutinizing the discourse of scientific authority as asserted by its most renowned figures. This article analyzes that month-long sequence of letters and commentary to parse the criticism of authority on the unexpected grounds of language itself, illuminating how <i>PMG</i> correspondents resisted the reification of scientific objectivity by suggesting that even esteemed scientific investigators conveyed personal prejudice.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Declining the Combat: Querying Scientific Authority in the Pall Mall Gazette\",\"authors\":\"Barbara D. Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>When the <i>Pall Mall Gazette</i> published an editorial about the fraud case brought against spiritualist medium D. D. Home in May 1868, the editor likely anticipated letters about the legitimacy of spiritualism—a topic of considerable media attention. Instead, he received multiple letters scrutinizing the discourse of scientific authority as asserted by its most renowned figures. This article analyzes that month-long sequence of letters and commentary to parse the criticism of authority on the unexpected grounds of language itself, illuminating how <i>PMG</i> correspondents resisted the reification of scientific objectivity by suggesting that even esteemed scientific investigators conveyed personal prejudice.</p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victorian Periodicals Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victorian Periodicals Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927880\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Periodicals Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:1868 年 5 月,《Pall Mall Gazette》发表了一篇关于灵媒 D. D. Home 欺诈案的社论。D. Home 的欺诈案发表社论时,编辑很可能预料到会有关于灵媒主义合法性的信件--这是一个备受媒体关注的话题。然而,他却收到了多封信件,对科学权威的论述进行了仔细的审查,因为这些论述是由科学界最著名的人物所宣称的。这篇文章分析了长达一个月的信件和评论序列,从语言本身这一意想不到的角度解析了对权威的批评,揭示了PMG的通信者是如何通过暗示即使是受人尊敬的科学研究者也会传达个人偏见来抵制科学客观性的重新整合的。
Declining the Combat: Querying Scientific Authority in the Pall Mall Gazette
Abstract:
When the Pall Mall Gazette published an editorial about the fraud case brought against spiritualist medium D. D. Home in May 1868, the editor likely anticipated letters about the legitimacy of spiritualism—a topic of considerable media attention. Instead, he received multiple letters scrutinizing the discourse of scientific authority as asserted by its most renowned figures. This article analyzes that month-long sequence of letters and commentary to parse the criticism of authority on the unexpected grounds of language itself, illuminating how PMG correspondents resisted the reification of scientific objectivity by suggesting that even esteemed scientific investigators conveyed personal prejudice.