{"title":"BA 诉国王和家庭法","authors":"Chris Martin","doi":"10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...","PeriodicalId":43272,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BA v The King and the law of home\",\"authors\":\"Chris Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在 BA v The King 一案中，高等法院以多数票裁定，在一名男子踢倒房门并殴打其前伴侣的情况下，不构成破门而入罪，因为该男子当时仍...
In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
