调查颊骨栅栏对上颌前部种植体的影响:为期 1-6 年的回顾性研究。

Mi Zhou, Yixin Wang, Vicha Huangphattarakul, Yi Man, Yili Qu
{"title":"调查颊骨栅栏对上颌前部种植体的影响:为期 1-6 年的回顾性研究。","authors":"Mi Zhou, Yixin Wang, Vicha Huangphattarakul, Yi Man, Yili Qu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent implant placement in the maxillary anterior region between January 2017 and December 2021 and had received final restorations 1 to 6 years prior were screened for inclusion in the present study. Propensity score matching was used to match the two-group sample size and reduce the influence of potential confounding factors. Generalised linear mixed models were employed to evaluate the correlation between buccal bone fenestration and peri-implant marginal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients with 50 implants were included in the study, 16 of whom had buccal bone fenestration (group 1) and 26 of whom did not (group 2). No implant failures occurred, resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 100.0%. There was no statistically significant difference between the pink aesthetic scores for the two groups. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.44 ± 0.46 mm for group 1 and 0.33 ± 0.32 mm for group 2 (P > 0.05). Buccal bone fenestration was not the influencing factor of marginal bone loss (P > 0.05). Marginal bone loss was greater around implants used to replace canines than those inserted to replace central incisors (P < 0.05). Far less marginal bone loss occurred around immediately loaded implants than delayed implants with cover screws (P < 0.05). When there is sufficient keratinised mucosa around the implant, marginal bone loss will decrease significantly (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, buccal bone fenestration defects around dental implants cannot influence peri-implant bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conflict-of-interest statement: </strong>The authors report no conflicts of interest relating to this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants: A 1- to 6-year retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Mi Zhou, Yixin Wang, Vicha Huangphattarakul, Yi Man, Yili Qu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent implant placement in the maxillary anterior region between January 2017 and December 2021 and had received final restorations 1 to 6 years prior were screened for inclusion in the present study. Propensity score matching was used to match the two-group sample size and reduce the influence of potential confounding factors. Generalised linear mixed models were employed to evaluate the correlation between buccal bone fenestration and peri-implant marginal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients with 50 implants were included in the study, 16 of whom had buccal bone fenestration (group 1) and 26 of whom did not (group 2). No implant failures occurred, resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 100.0%. There was no statistically significant difference between the pink aesthetic scores for the two groups. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.44 ± 0.46 mm for group 1 and 0.33 ± 0.32 mm for group 2 (P > 0.05). Buccal bone fenestration was not the influencing factor of marginal bone loss (P > 0.05). Marginal bone loss was greater around implants used to replace canines than those inserted to replace central incisors (P < 0.05). Far less marginal bone loss occurred around immediately loaded implants than delayed implants with cover screws (P < 0.05). When there is sufficient keratinised mucosa around the implant, marginal bone loss will decrease significantly (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, buccal bone fenestration defects around dental implants cannot influence peri-implant bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conflict-of-interest statement: </strong>The authors report no conflicts of interest relating to this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究颊骨栅栏对上颌前牙种植体的影响:筛选出 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在上颌前牙区域接受种植体植入且 1 至 6 年前接受过最终修复的患者纳入本研究。采用倾向评分匹配法来匹配两组样本量,并减少潜在混杂因素的影响。研究采用了广义线性混合模型来评估颊侧骨隙缝与种植体周围边缘骨质流失之间的相关性:研究共纳入了42名患者,50颗种植体,其中16人有颊骨瓣膜(第1组),26人没有(第2组)。无种植体失败,种植体累积存活率为 100.0%。两组的粉红色美学评分在统计学上没有明显差异。第一组的平均边缘骨损失为 0.44 ± 0.46 毫米,第二组为 0.33 ± 0.32 毫米(P > 0.05)。颊骨栅栏不是边缘骨质流失的影响因素(P > 0.05)。用于替代犬齿的种植体周围的边缘骨损失大于用于替代中切牙的种植体(P < 0.05)。在即刻植入的种植体周围发生的边缘骨质流失远少于使用覆盖螺钉的延迟植入种植体(P < 0.05)。当种植体周围有足够的角质化粘膜时,边缘骨损失会明显减少(P < 0.05):在本研究的局限性范围内,牙科种植体周围的颊骨隙缺陷不会影响种植体周围的骨质流失:作者报告与本研究无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants: A 1- to 6-year retrospective study.

Purpose: To examine the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent implant placement in the maxillary anterior region between January 2017 and December 2021 and had received final restorations 1 to 6 years prior were screened for inclusion in the present study. Propensity score matching was used to match the two-group sample size and reduce the influence of potential confounding factors. Generalised linear mixed models were employed to evaluate the correlation between buccal bone fenestration and peri-implant marginal bone loss.

Results: A total of 42 patients with 50 implants were included in the study, 16 of whom had buccal bone fenestration (group 1) and 26 of whom did not (group 2). No implant failures occurred, resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 100.0%. There was no statistically significant difference between the pink aesthetic scores for the two groups. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.44 ± 0.46 mm for group 1 and 0.33 ± 0.32 mm for group 2 (P > 0.05). Buccal bone fenestration was not the influencing factor of marginal bone loss (P > 0.05). Marginal bone loss was greater around implants used to replace canines than those inserted to replace central incisors (P < 0.05). Far less marginal bone loss occurred around immediately loaded implants than delayed implants with cover screws (P < 0.05). When there is sufficient keratinised mucosa around the implant, marginal bone loss will decrease significantly (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, buccal bone fenestration defects around dental implants cannot influence peri-implant bone loss.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors report no conflicts of interest relating to this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 360-degree extraction socket classification for immediate dentoalveolar restoration. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of guided bone regeneration with polytetrafluoroethylene titanium-reinforced membranes, CAD/CAM semi-occlusive titanium meshes and CAD/CAM occlusive titanium foils in partially atrophic arches. Bone augmentation using titanium mesh: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and histological efficacy of a new implant surface in achieving early and stable osseointegration: An in vivo study. Crown-to-implant ratio: A misnomer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1