术前超声引导下双侧腰四神经阻滞对微创子宫切除术后恢复质量的影响(ERAS)。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.019
{"title":"术前超声引导下双侧腰四神经阻滞对微创子宫切除术后恢复质量的影响(ERAS)。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><p><span>To assess the effect of preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum nerve block (QLB) on quality of recovery after minimally invasive hysterectomy, in an </span>enhanced recovery after surgery setting.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (Canadian Task Force level I).</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University-affiliated tertiary medical center.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p><span><span>All women undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women with chronic pain, chronic anticoagulation, and </span>body mass index &gt;50 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup> were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation, to one of the following 2 arms, and stratified based on robotic versus laparoscopic approach.</p><p> <!-->1. QLB: QLB (bupivacaine) + sham local trocar sites infiltration (normal saline)</p><p> <!-->2. Local infiltration: sham QLB (normal saline) + local infiltration (bupivacaine)</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><p><span><span><span>The primary outcome was defined as the quality of recovery score based on the validated questionnaire Quality of Recovery, completed 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dynamic pain scores, accumulated opioid consumption up to 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, </span>surgical complications, length of hospital stay, time to first pain medication administration in the </span>postanesthesia care unit, and adverse events. A total of 76 women were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 39–50), 47% of the participants were African American, and mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup><span> (standard deviation [SD] 8.1). The mean Quality of Recovery score was 179.1 (SD ± 10.3) in the QLB and 175.6 (SD ± 9.7) for the local anesthesia group (p = .072). All secondary outcomes were comparable between groups.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>QLBs do not significantly improve quality of recovery after elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with local anesthetic port site infiltration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Preoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Nerve Block on Quality of Recovery After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Setting\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><p><span>To assess the effect of preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum nerve block (QLB) on quality of recovery after minimally invasive hysterectomy, in an </span>enhanced recovery after surgery setting.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (Canadian Task Force level I).</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University-affiliated tertiary medical center.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p><span><span>All women undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women with chronic pain, chronic anticoagulation, and </span>body mass index &gt;50 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup> were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation, to one of the following 2 arms, and stratified based on robotic versus laparoscopic approach.</p><p> <!-->1. QLB: QLB (bupivacaine) + sham local trocar sites infiltration (normal saline)</p><p> <!-->2. Local infiltration: sham QLB (normal saline) + local infiltration (bupivacaine)</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><p><span><span><span>The primary outcome was defined as the quality of recovery score based on the validated questionnaire Quality of Recovery, completed 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dynamic pain scores, accumulated opioid consumption up to 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, </span>surgical complications, length of hospital stay, time to first pain medication administration in the </span>postanesthesia care unit, and adverse events. A total of 76 women were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 39–50), 47% of the participants were African American, and mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup><span> (standard deviation [SD] 8.1). The mean Quality of Recovery score was 179.1 (SD ± 10.3) in the QLB and 175.6 (SD ± 9.7) for the local anesthesia group (p = .072). All secondary outcomes were comparable between groups.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>QLBs do not significantly improve quality of recovery after elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with local anesthetic port site infiltration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024002310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024002310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的评估术前双侧超声引导下腰股沟神经阻滞(QLB)对微创子宫切除术后恢复质量的影响:随机、对照、双盲试验(加拿大工作组 I 级):患者: 所有接受选择性机器人手术的女性:所有接受机器人或腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性。排除慢性疼痛、长期抗凝和体重指数(BMI)大于 50 kg/m2 的女性:患者按 1:1 随机分配到以下两组中的一组,并根据机器人与腹腔镜方法进行分层。1.QLB:QLB(布比卡因)+ Sham 局部套管部位浸润(生理盐水)。2.局部浸润:测量和主要结果:主要结果是根据术后 24 小时完成的有效问卷(QOR-40)得出的恢复质量评分。次要结果包括:动态疼痛评分、24 小时内阿片类药物累计用量、术后恶心和呕吐、手术并发症、住院时间、麻醉后护理病房(PACU)首次使用止痛药物的时间以及不良事件。研究共纳入了 76 名妇女。两组的人口统计学特征相似。中位年龄为 44(IQR 39-50)岁,47% 的参与者为非洲裔美国人,平均体重指数为 32.8(SD 8.1)kg/m2。QLB组的平均QOR-40评分为179.1(+/- 10.3SD),局麻组为175.6(+/- 9.7SD)(P=0.072)。各组的所有次要结果均具有可比性:结论:与局部麻醉端口部位浸润相比,QLB并不能明显改善择期机器人或腹腔镜子宫切除术后的恢复质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Preoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Nerve Block on Quality of Recovery After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Setting

Study Objective

To assess the effect of preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum nerve block (QLB) on quality of recovery after minimally invasive hysterectomy, in an enhanced recovery after surgery setting.

Design

Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (Canadian Task Force level I).

Setting

University-affiliated tertiary medical center.

Patients

All women undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women with chronic pain, chronic anticoagulation, and body mass index >50 kg/m2 were excluded.

Intervention

Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation, to one of the following 2 arms, and stratified based on robotic versus laparoscopic approach.

 1. QLB: QLB (bupivacaine) + sham local trocar sites infiltration (normal saline)

 2. Local infiltration: sham QLB (normal saline) + local infiltration (bupivacaine)

Measurements and Main Results

The primary outcome was defined as the quality of recovery score based on the validated questionnaire Quality of Recovery, completed 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dynamic pain scores, accumulated opioid consumption up to 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, time to first pain medication administration in the postanesthesia care unit, and adverse events. A total of 76 women were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 39–50), 47% of the participants were African American, and mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m2 (standard deviation [SD] 8.1). The mean Quality of Recovery score was 179.1 (SD ± 10.3) in the QLB and 175.6 (SD ± 9.7) for the local anesthesia group (p = .072). All secondary outcomes were comparable between groups.

Conclusions

QLBs do not significantly improve quality of recovery after elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with local anesthetic port site infiltration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic closure of rectosigmoid injury with OTS clip after laparoscopic surgery for extensive endometriosis. Cover 1 Editorial Board Accessory Obturator Nerve During vNOTES Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Retroperitoneal Cystic Endometriosis Incidentally Found at Time of Hysterectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1