量化气隙误差对乳腺癌放疗皮肤剂量的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/15330338241258566
Chunbo Tang, Jun Yuan, Hailiang Guo, Zhongyang Dai, Biaoshui Liu, Haiyan Xi, Ji He, Shanzhou Niu
{"title":"量化气隙误差对乳腺癌放疗皮肤剂量的影响。","authors":"Chunbo Tang, Jun Yuan, Hailiang Guo, Zhongyang Dai, Biaoshui Liu, Haiyan Xi, Ji He, Shanzhou Niu","doi":"10.1177/15330338241258566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Determining the impact of air gap errors on the skin dose in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy under dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective study that involved 55 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy following modified radical mastectomy. All plans employed tangential IMRT, with a prescription dose of 50 Gy, and bolus added solely to the chest wall. Simulated air gap depth errors of 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm were introduced at depression or inframammary fold areas on the skin, resulting in the creation of air gaps named Air2, Air3, and Air5. Utilizing a multivariable GEE, the average dose (<i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>) of the local skin was determined to evaluate its relationship with air gap volume and the lateral beam's average angle (AALB). Additionally, an analysis was conducted on the impact of gaps on local skin. <b>Results:</b> When simulating an air gap depth error of 2 mm, the average <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> in plan2 increased by 0.46 Gy compared to the initial plan (planO) (<i>p</i> < .001). For the 3-mm air gap, the average <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> of plan3 was 0.51 Gy higher than that of planO (<i>p</i> < .001). When simulating the air gap as 5 mm, the average <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> of plan5 significantly increased by 0.59 Gy compared to planO (<i>p</i> < .001). The TCP results showed a similar trend to those of <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>. As the depth of air gap error increases, NTCP values also gradually rise. The linear regression of the multivariable GEE equation indicates that the volume of air gaps and the AALB are strong predictors of <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>. <b>Conclusion:</b> With small irregular air gap errors simulated in 55 patients, the values of skin's <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>, TCP, and NTCP increased. A multivariable linear GEE regression model may effectively explain the impact of air gap volume and AALB on the local skin.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantify the Effect of Air Gap Errors on Skin Dose for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Chunbo Tang, Jun Yuan, Hailiang Guo, Zhongyang Dai, Biaoshui Liu, Haiyan Xi, Ji He, Shanzhou Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15330338241258566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Determining the impact of air gap errors on the skin dose in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy under dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective study that involved 55 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy following modified radical mastectomy. All plans employed tangential IMRT, with a prescription dose of 50 Gy, and bolus added solely to the chest wall. Simulated air gap depth errors of 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm were introduced at depression or inframammary fold areas on the skin, resulting in the creation of air gaps named Air2, Air3, and Air5. Utilizing a multivariable GEE, the average dose (<i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>) of the local skin was determined to evaluate its relationship with air gap volume and the lateral beam's average angle (AALB). Additionally, an analysis was conducted on the impact of gaps on local skin. <b>Results:</b> When simulating an air gap depth error of 2 mm, the average <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> in plan2 increased by 0.46 Gy compared to the initial plan (planO) (<i>p</i> < .001). For the 3-mm air gap, the average <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> of plan3 was 0.51 Gy higher than that of planO (<i>p</i> < .001). When simulating the air gap as 5 mm, the average <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub> of plan5 significantly increased by 0.59 Gy compared to planO (<i>p</i> < .001). The TCP results showed a similar trend to those of <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>. As the depth of air gap error increases, NTCP values also gradually rise. The linear regression of the multivariable GEE equation indicates that the volume of air gaps and the AALB are strong predictors of <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>. <b>Conclusion:</b> With small irregular air gap errors simulated in 55 patients, the values of skin's <i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>, TCP, and NTCP increased. A multivariable linear GEE regression model may effectively explain the impact of air gap volume and AALB on the local skin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135118/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241258566\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241258566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定气隙误差对动态调强放射治疗(IMRT)技术下乳腺癌术后放疗皮肤剂量的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性研究:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及 55 名在改良根治性乳房切除术后接受术后放疗的患者。所有计划均采用切向 IMRT,处方剂量为 50 Gy,仅在胸壁添加栓剂。在皮肤凹陷或乳房下褶皱区域引入了 2 毫米、3 毫米和 5 毫米的模拟气隙深度误差,从而产生了名为 Air2、Air3 和 Air5 的气隙。利用多变量 GEE,确定了局部皮肤的平均剂量 (Dmean),以评估其与气隙体积和侧向光束平均角度 (AALB) 的关系。此外,还分析了气隙对局部皮肤的影响。结果:当模拟气隙深度误差为 2 毫米时,平面 2 的平均 Dmean 比初始平面(平面 O)增加了 0.46 Gy(平面 3 的 p Dmean 比平面 O 高出 0.51 Gy)(平面 5 的 p Dmean 比平面 O 显著增加了 0.59 Gy(平面 2 的 p Dmean 比平面 O 高出 0.59 Gy))。随着气隙误差深度的增加,NTCP 值也逐渐升高。多变量 GEE 方程的线性回归结果表明,气隙体积和 AALB 对 Dmean 有很强的预测作用。结论在 55 例患者中模拟了较小的不规则气隙误差后,皮肤的 Dmean、TCP 和 NTCP 值均有所增加。多变量线性 GEE 回归模型可有效解释气隙容积和 AALB 对局部皮肤的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantify the Effect of Air Gap Errors on Skin Dose for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.

Purpose: Determining the impact of air gap errors on the skin dose in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy under dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. Methods: This was a retrospective study that involved 55 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy following modified radical mastectomy. All plans employed tangential IMRT, with a prescription dose of 50 Gy, and bolus added solely to the chest wall. Simulated air gap depth errors of 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm were introduced at depression or inframammary fold areas on the skin, resulting in the creation of air gaps named Air2, Air3, and Air5. Utilizing a multivariable GEE, the average dose (Dmean) of the local skin was determined to evaluate its relationship with air gap volume and the lateral beam's average angle (AALB). Additionally, an analysis was conducted on the impact of gaps on local skin. Results: When simulating an air gap depth error of 2 mm, the average Dmean in plan2 increased by 0.46 Gy compared to the initial plan (planO) (p < .001). For the 3-mm air gap, the average Dmean of plan3 was 0.51 Gy higher than that of planO (p < .001). When simulating the air gap as 5 mm, the average Dmean of plan5 significantly increased by 0.59 Gy compared to planO (p < .001). The TCP results showed a similar trend to those of Dmean. As the depth of air gap error increases, NTCP values also gradually rise. The linear regression of the multivariable GEE equation indicates that the volume of air gaps and the AALB are strong predictors of Dmean. Conclusion: With small irregular air gap errors simulated in 55 patients, the values of skin's Dmean, TCP, and NTCP increased. A multivariable linear GEE regression model may effectively explain the impact of air gap volume and AALB on the local skin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
期刊最新文献
A 3 M Evaluation Protocol for Examining Lymph Nodes in Cancer Patients: Multi-Modal, Multi-Omics, Multi-Stage Approach Prognostic Value of IGFBP6 in Breast Cancer: Focus on Glucometabolism The Antimicrobial Peptide Merecidin Inhibit the Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Obstructing EMT via miR-30d-5p/Vimentin Predictive Value of Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count on the Efficacy of Treatment with Camrelizumab in Combination with Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatitis B-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Retracted: “CRISPR/Cas9: A Revolutionary Genome Editing Tool for Human Cancers Treatment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1