医生对心力衰竭药物处方的看法:范围界定综述。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1159/000539524
Swetha Vasudevan, Archana Thayaparan, Lung En Teng, Noor Lammoza, Ar Kar Aung, Gail Edwards, Harry Gibbs, Ingrid Hopper
{"title":"医生对心力衰竭药物处方的看法:范围界定综述。","authors":"Swetha Vasudevan, Archana Thayaparan, Lung En Teng, Noor Lammoza, Ar Kar Aung, Gail Edwards, Harry Gibbs, Ingrid Hopper","doi":"10.1159/000539524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The swift uptake of new medications into clinical practice has many benefits; however, slow uptake has been seen previously with other guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) in heart failure (HF). Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are a novel therapy in HF proven to be efficacious and will have beneficial clinical outcomes if prescribed. Understanding physician perspectives on prescribing GDMT in HF can help target strategies to bridge the gap between guidelines and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study followed the PRISMA guide for scoping reviews. A search was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases in April 2024. Studies included were those using qualitative methods to assess physician perspectives towards prescribing any HF medication. Common themes were identified through thematic synthesis following the methods from Cochrane Training and using software MAXQDA Analysis Pro.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>708 studies were found in the search, with 23 full studies included. The most pertinent barriers identified were concern for medication adverse effects, unclear role responsibilities between physicians of different specialities, patient co-morbidities, and unwillingness to alter therapies of stable patients. The most identified enablers included awareness of efficacy, influence from colleagues, and the use of multi-media approaches for information dissemination. Perceptions were also found to change over time and vary among prescriber groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physicians perceive common barriers and enablers of prescribing GDMT in HF, despite differences in prescriber groups and time periods. The identified barriers and enablers may be targeted to improve implementation of GDMT into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician Perceptions of Medication Prescribing in Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Swetha Vasudevan, Archana Thayaparan, Lung En Teng, Noor Lammoza, Ar Kar Aung, Gail Edwards, Harry Gibbs, Ingrid Hopper\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The swift uptake of new medications into clinical practice has many benefits; however, slow uptake has been seen previously with other guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) in heart failure (HF). Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are a novel therapy in HF proven to be efficacious and will have beneficial clinical outcomes if prescribed. Understanding physician perspectives on prescribing GDMT in HF can help target strategies to bridge the gap between guidelines and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study followed the PRISMA guide for scoping reviews. A search was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases in April 2024. Studies included were those using qualitative methods to assess physician perspectives towards prescribing any HF medication. Common themes were identified through thematic synthesis following the methods from Cochrane Training and using software MAXQDA Analysis Pro.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>708 studies were found in the search, with 23 full studies included. The most pertinent barriers identified were concern for medication adverse effects, unclear role responsibilities between physicians of different specialities, patient co-morbidities, and unwillingness to alter therapies of stable patients. The most identified enablers included awareness of efficacy, influence from colleagues, and the use of multi-media approaches for information dissemination. Perceptions were also found to change over time and vary among prescriber groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physicians perceive common barriers and enablers of prescribing GDMT in HF, despite differences in prescriber groups and time periods. The identified barriers and enablers may be targeted to improve implementation of GDMT into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539524\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:将新药迅速纳入临床实践有很多好处,但以前在心力衰竭(HF)的其他指导性医疗疗法(GDMT)中也出现过吸收缓慢的情况。葡萄糖辅转运体钠 2 抑制剂是一种新型的心力衰竭治疗药物,经证实具有良好的疗效,如果处方使用,将产生有益的临床结果。了解医生对心力衰竭 GDMT 处方的看法有助于制定有针对性的策略,缩小指南与实践之间的差距:研究遵循 PRISMA 范围界定综述指南和 JBI 范围界定综述手册。于 2024 年 4 月使用 EMBASE、Medline 和 PubMed 数据库进行了检索。纳入的研究均采用定性方法评估医生对开具任何高血压药物的看法。按照 Cochrane Training 的方法并使用 MAXQDA Analysis Pro 软件进行专题综合,以确定共同主题:搜索共发现 708 项研究,其中包括 23 项完整研究。发现的最相关障碍包括对药物不良反应的担忧、不同专科医师之间职责不清、患者合并症以及不愿改变病情稳定患者的疗法。发现最多的促进因素包括对疗效的认识、同事的影响以及使用多媒体方法传播信息。研究还发现,医生的看法会随着时间的推移而发生变化,而且不同处方群体的看法也不尽相同:结论:尽管开处方者群体和时间段存在差异,但医生在开具 GDMT 治疗高血压处方时仍存在共同的障碍和促进因素。已发现的障碍和有利因素可作为改进 GDMT 在临床实践中实施的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physician Perceptions of Medication Prescribing in Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: The swift uptake of new medications into clinical practice has many benefits; however, slow uptake has been seen previously with other guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) in heart failure (HF). Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are a novel therapy in HF proven to be efficacious and will have beneficial clinical outcomes if prescribed. Understanding physician perspectives on prescribing GDMT in HF can help target strategies to bridge the gap between guidelines and practice.

Methods: The study followed the PRISMA guide for scoping reviews. A search was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases in April 2024. Studies included were those using qualitative methods to assess physician perspectives towards prescribing any HF medication. Common themes were identified through thematic synthesis following the methods from Cochrane Training and using software MAXQDA Analysis Pro.

Results: 708 studies were found in the search, with 23 full studies included. The most pertinent barriers identified were concern for medication adverse effects, unclear role responsibilities between physicians of different specialities, patient co-morbidities, and unwillingness to alter therapies of stable patients. The most identified enablers included awareness of efficacy, influence from colleagues, and the use of multi-media approaches for information dissemination. Perceptions were also found to change over time and vary among prescriber groups.

Conclusions: Physicians perceive common barriers and enablers of prescribing GDMT in HF, despite differences in prescriber groups and time periods. The identified barriers and enablers may be targeted to improve implementation of GDMT into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Disease: Perspectives on Disparities in Women's Treatment and Outcomes. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation for pediatric paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Floppy Mitral Valve/Mitral Valve Prolapse and Manifestations Not Related to Mitral Regurgitation: Time to Search the Dark Side of the Moon. Impact of an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program on cardiopulmonary test parameters. Prevalence and predictors of thromboembolic events in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular thrombus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1